PISA Problem-Solving of Students’ Mathematical Literacy in Adversity Quotient Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v8n2.p128-140Keywords:
camper, climber, mathematical literacy, PISA, quitter, adversity quotientAbstract
This descriptive qualitative study selected three high school students to describe students' mathematical literacy skills in solving PISA model problems based on adversity quotient (AQ). Three subjects from different AQs were involved in this study based on the results of completing the Adversity Response Profile (ARP) questionnaire and good oral communication skills based on the advice of mathematics teachers. Students' AQ was collected through ARP questionnaire instrument, mathematical literacy skills were collected through providing PISA questions and interview guidelines. Furthermore, the data were analyzed based on the stages of reduction, presentation, and conclusion. The results of completing the ARP questionnaire obtained three subjects with AQ climber, camper, and quitter supported by good communication skills. The results of this study and through triangulation of techniques showed that subjects with AQ climber and camper satisfied five indicators of mathematical literacy skills, including communication, mathematization, reasoning and argumentation, using mathematical tools, and designing solution strategies. Meanwhile, AQ quitter subjects were only able to satisfy four indicators of mathematical literacy indicators, which are mathematization, representation, reasoning and argumentation, use of mathematical tools, and design of solution strategies. The findings of this study are that quitter subjects are unable to satisfy communication indicators while climber and camper subjects are able to satisfy communication indicators. In addition, quitter subjects were also unable to use symbolic, technical, formal, language and operation forms in solving PISA problems, while climber and camper subjects were able to satisfy these indicators.
References
Agustin, P. D., & Prayitno, L. L. (2023). High School Students ’ Critical Thinking Ability: Analysis in TVLS Word Problem. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUPITEK), 6(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol6iss1pp9-18
Akbar, P., Hamid, A., Bernard, M., & Sugandi, A. I. (2017). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan disposisi matematik siswa kelas XI SMA Putra Juang dalam materi peluang [Analysis of problem-solving abilities and mathematical dispositions of class XI SMA Putra Juang in the matter of opportunities]. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v2i1.62
Baharuddin, M. R., Sukmawati, S., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). Deskripsi Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Pada Materi Bangun Datar Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Awal Siswa. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v7i1.1803
Chabibah, L. N., Siswanah, E., & Tsani, D. F. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita barisan ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i2.29024
Chasanah, A. N., Wicaksono, A. B., Nurtsaniyah, S., & Utami, R. N. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Statistika Inferensial Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. Edumatica Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 46–56. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/edumatica/article/view/10621%0Ahttps://online-journal.unja.ac.id/edumatica/article/download/10621/6549
Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publication.
Delello, J. A. (2014). Insights from pre-service teachers using science-based augmented reality. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0021-y
Dewantara, A. H. (2018). Soal Matematika Model Pisa: Alternatif Materi Program Pengayaan. DIDAKTIKA : Jurnal Kependidikan, 12(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.30863/didaktika.v12i2.186
Domu, I., Regar, V. E., Kumesan, S., Mangelep, N. O., & Manurung, O. (2023). Did the Teacher Ask the Right Questions? An Analysis of Teacher Asking Ability in Stimulating Students’ Mathematical Literacy. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(5), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i5.5970
Farida, R. N., Qohar, A., & Rahardjo, S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa SMA Kelas X Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Tipe Pisa Konten Change and Relationship. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 2802–2815. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.972
Fernanda, B., Shodikin, A., & Susanah, S. (2024). Mathematics Literacy of Middle School Students with Socio-Cultural Context Viewed from Learning Style. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 8(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol8-iss1/847
Güler, H. K., & Arslan, C. (2019). Mathematical competencies required by mathematical literacy problems. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(2), 57–70. http://mojes.um.edu.my/index.php/MOJES/article/view/17327/9965
Kholid, M. N., Rofi’ah, F., Ishartono, N., Waluyo, M., Maharani, S., Swastika, A., Faiziyah, N., & Sari, C. K. (2022). What Are Students’ Difficulties in Implementing Mathematical Literacy Skills for Solving PISA-Like Problem? Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i2.5057
Kholifasari, R., Utami, C., & Mariyam, M. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa Ditinjau Dari Karakter Kemandirian Belajar Materi Aljabar. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.31316/j.derivat.v7i2.1057
Khusnah, K., Ekawati, R., & Shodikin, A. (2022). Student’s error in solving change and relationship-PISA problem and its scaffolding. Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy (JoMP), 4(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.26740/jomp.v4n1.p9-20
Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
Lestari, R. D., & Effendi, K. N. S. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Bangun Datar. Biormatika : Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.35569/biormatika.v8i1.1221
Mawardhiyah, K., & Manoy, J. T. (2018). Literasi Matematika Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) Berdasarkan Adversity Quotient (AQ). MATHEdunesa, 7(3), 638–643.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publication.
Mumfaza, R., & Setyaningsih, R. (2024). Analysis Of Students’ Mathematical Literacy Ability In Solving Pisa-Oriented Questions Content Change And Relationship Judging From Self-Efficacy. Mathline : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 799–816. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v9i3.652
Mutianingsih, N., Prayitno, L. L., Sugandi, E., & Rahmawati, S. (2020). An investigation of failure solving ill-structured problems : a case study. 8(2), 144–160.
Nilasari, N. T., & Anggreini, D. (2019). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Elemen, 5(2), 206. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v5i2.1342
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving (Revised Edition). In OECD Publishing. OECD.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Mathematics Framework (pp. 73–95). https://doi.org/10.1787/13c8a22c-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results Factsheets Indonesia. In The Language of Science Education (Vol. 1). https://oecdch.art/a40de1dbaf/C108.
Ovan, O., & Nugroho, S. (2017). Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Ditinjau dari Metakognisi Siswa pada Model Pisa-Cps Info Artikel. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(1), 96–102. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer
Pan, Z., López, M. F., Li, C., & Liu, M. (2021). Introducing augmented reality in early childhood literacy learning. Research in Learning Technology, 29(2539), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2539
Pertiwi, E. D., Khabibah, S., & Budiarto, M. T. (2020). Komunikasi Matematika dalam Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i1.151
Prayitno, L. L., Purwanto, P., Subanji, S., Susiswo, S., & As’ari, A. R. (2020). Exploring student’s representation process in solving ill-structured problems geometry. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.17275/PER.20.28.7.2
Prayitno, L. L., Purwanto, P., Subanji, S., Susiswo, S., & Mutianingsih, N. (2022). Students’ semantic reasoning characteristics on solving double discount problem. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 7(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v7i2.16325
Pujiastuti, H., & Haryadi, R. (2023). Enhancing mathematical literacy ability through guided inquiry learning with augmented reality. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i1.4338
Rifai, R., & Wutsqa, D. (2017). Mathematical Literacy of State Junior Secondary School Students in Bantul Regency. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 1866(2), 152–162. http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpms
Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Darmawijoyo. (2019). Senior high school mathematics learning through mathematics modeling approach. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.8746.425-444
Sonia, P. N., & Prayitno, L. L. (2023). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas IX SMP Hang Tuah 2 Surabaya Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika (SNPM), 497–509.
Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity Quotient : Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang (Adversity Quotinet: Turning Obstacles Into Opportunities). PT Grasindo.
Sugiyono. (2016). Pdf-Buku-Metode-Penelitian-Sugiyono_Compress.Pdf (p. 62). Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. CV. Alfabeta.
Tak, B., & Kim, D. (2020). An analysis on error types of graphs for statistical literacy education: Ethical problems at data analysis in the statistical problem solving. Journal of Elementary Mathmeatics Education in Korea, 24(1), 1–30.
Utomo, M. F. W., Pujiastuti, H., & Mutaqin, A. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 11(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v11i2.25569
Wicaksana, Y., Wardono, W., & Ridlo, S. (2017). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dan Karakter Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Berbantuan Schoology. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(2), 167–174. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer
Yunus, R. (2020). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Metode Pembelajaran Jigsaw Di Kelas Vi Sdn 06 Indralaya Utara. Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Edukasi, 13(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.33557/jedukasi.v13i1.1030
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Abstract views: 40
,
PDF Downloads: 36
