The Failure of National Madrasah Science Competition Students in Solving Islam-Integrated Mathematics Problem on Triangle Material

Imam Rofiki; Muhammad Zia Alghar

doi:10.26740/jrpipm.v7n2.p151-170

Authors

Imam Rofiki Universitas Negeri Malang http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2964-9431
Muhammad Zia Alghar Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v7n2.p151-170

Keywords:

Mathematics Problem Failure, Madrasah Science Competition, Islamic Integrated Mathematics, Triangle

Abstract

Students, especially madrasah students, need to master Islamic integrated mathematics problem-solving. However, many madrasah students need help to solve Islamic-integrated mathematics problems. The failure occurs in one part and several interrelated parts of the solution. Therefore, this study aims to explore the failure of madrasah science competition students at the national level in solving Islamic integrated mathematics problems on triangle material. The research was conducted qualitatively on 29 students at the Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs) or equivalent level who participated in the national madrasah science competition, and they failed to solve Islamic integrated mathematics problems on triangle material. The research instrument was a triangle problem given during the National Madrasah Science Competition (KSM) in 2023. The results showed five categories of failure: failure to provide a correct and complete process, failure to integrate Islamic values, failure to use mathematical concepts, failure to use mathematical principles, and failure to apply relevant strategies. This research contributes to teachers by characterizing student failures that can be used as a guideline in designing learning strategies that can overcome student failures. In addition, teachers can provide scaffolding to students according to the type of failure.

References

Abdussakir. (2014). Matematika dalam Al-Qur’an. UIN-Maliki Press.

Abdussakir, & Rosimanidar. (2017). Model integrasi matematika dan Al-Quran serta praktik pembelajarannya. In Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika di dalam Al-Quran (pp. 1–16).

Alghar, M. Z. (2022). Proses berpikir analitis mahasiswa matematika dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika berdasarkan teori APOS ditinjau dari jenis kelamin. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.

Alghar, M. Z., & Afandi, M. I. (2024). Islamic integrated maths: Mathematical logic in the Qur’an. Fahima: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kajian Keislaman, 3(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.54622/fahima.v3i1.144

Alghar, M. Z., Cholidiyah, A. C., & Radjak, D. S. (2023). Integrative mathematics: Mathematical concepts in hadiths with the Theme of Uqiyah. West Science Islamic Studies, 1(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsiss.v1i01.285

Alghar, M. Z., & Marhayati. (2023). Ethnomathematics: Exploration of fractal geometry in gate ornaments of The Sumenep Jamik Mosque Using The Lindenmayer System. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v6i3.18219

Amalia, D., Noviani, D., Djamali, M. F., & Rofiki, I. (2021). Exploring mathematical concepts and philosophical values in Jember Batik. Abjadia: International Journal of Education, 6(2), 144-159. https://doi.org/10.18860/abj.v6i2.13119

Amaliah, F., Sutirna, & Zulkarnaen, R. (2021). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa pada materi segiempat dan segitiga. Aksioma: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v12i1.7202

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Azizah, N. N., Susiswo, & Sisworo. (2021). Analytical thinking process of students in solving mathematical problems of quadratic functions. Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i1.3440

Bafadhol, I. (2017). Lembaga pendidikan Islam di Indonesia. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(11), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v6i11.95

Bedewy, S. El, & Lavicza, Z. (2023). STEAM+ X-Extending the transdisciplinary of STEAM-based educational approaches: A theoretical contribution. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48(101299), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101299

Biber, C., Tuna, A., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). The mistakes and the misconceptions of the eighth grade students on the subject of angles. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9387

Cipta, E. S., & Hori, M. (2018). Mathematics and Islamic thought: Seeing relationship between mathematics and Islamic teaching resources. International Journal of Nusantara Islam, 6(2), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v6i2.5632

Ennis, R. (2011). Critical thinking: Reflection and perspective Part II. Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines, 26(2), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews201126215

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

Goos, M. (2002). Understanding metacognitive failure. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00130-X

Gràcia, M., Simón, C., Salvador-Beltran, F., Adam Alcocer, A. L., Mas, J. M., Giné, C., & Dalmau, M. (2020). The transition process from center-based programmes to family-centered practices in Spain: a multiple case study. Early Child Development and Care, 190(14), 2192–2204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1564916

Hapiz, A., Afifuddin, M., Annisa, H., Abdussakir, & Rofiki, I. (2019). Bilangan pecahan dalam Al-Quran dan hadits. In R. Yudi, S. Sendika, T. Tyas, H. Kurniawan, W. I. Purwaningsih, & P. Nugraheni (Eds.), Prosiding Sendika (Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 72–80). Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo.

Hendrawati, N. E., Wulandari, S., Ulum, M., Asnawi, M. H., Rofiki, I., & Abdussakir. (2020). Integrative mathematics learning: Study of hadits on number. Abjadia, 5(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.18860/abj.v5i1.8675

Himmah, W. I., Nayazik, A., & Setyawan, F. (2019). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy to analyze the final mathematics examination problems in Junior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 12028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012028

Huda, N., Sutawidjaja, A., & Rahardjo, S. (2018). The errors of metacognitive evaluation on metacognitive failure of students in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1008(1), 12073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012073

Huda, N., Sutawidjaja, A., Subanji, & Rahardjo, S. (2019). Investigation of students’ metacognitive failures in mathematical problem solving based on metacognitive behavior. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 32102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032102

Indraswari, L., Lestari, A. W., & Hastari, R. C. (2019). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal−soal HOTS materi segiempat dan segitiga ditinjau dari gender. Delta: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.31941/delta.v7i2.874

Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38(6), 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9093-x

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Kurniawan, H., Sutawidjaja, A., As’ari, A. R., Muksar, M., & Setiawan, I. (2018). Investigating students’ failure in fractional concept construction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1008(1), 12064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012064

Lima, R. N. de, & Tall, D. (2006). The concept of equations: What have students met before? In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, p. 233). Charles University.

Linda, Bernard, M., & Fitriani, N. (2020). Analisis kesulitan siswa SMP Kelas VIII pada materi segiempat dan segitiga berdasarkan tahapan berpikir Van Hiele. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 4(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v4i2.1066

Listiyana, F. (2012). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal rumus–rumus segitiga pada materi trigonometri Kelas X SMAN 1 Cawas Kabupaten Klaten. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2

Maulana, F., & Mutmainah, S. (2018). Pembinaan guru MTs Maarif NU 6 Taman Negeri menghadapi Kompetisi Sains Madrasah (KSM). Lumbung Inovasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(2), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.36312/linov.v3i2.445

Mulyati, S. (2000). Geometri euclid. Malang: JICA.

Novferma. (2016). Analisis kesulitan dan self-efficacy siswa SMP dalam pemecahan masalah matematika berbentuk soal cerita. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.10403

Nugrawati, U., Nuryakin, & Afrilianto, M. (2018). Analisis kesulitan belajar pada kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa MTs di Kota Cimahi Dengan materi segitiga dan segiempat. IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 1(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v1i2.2543

Portuna, N. D. A., Fuadiah, N. F., & Surmilasari, N. (2023). Learning obstacle materi volume bangun ruang sisi datar prisma segitiga pembelajaran matematika Kelas V SDN 80 Palembang. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 11(2), 480–487. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v11i2.17300

Prahmana, R. C. I. (2022). Ethno-realistic mathematics education: The promising learning approach in the city of culture. SN Social Sciences, 2(257), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00571-w

Prismana, R. D. E., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Pramudya, I. (2018). Analysis of difficulties in mathematics problem solving based on revised Bloom’s Taxonomy viewed from high self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1008(1), 12063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012063

Radjak, D. S., Alghar, M. Z., & Cholidiyah, A. C. (2023). Exploration of the concept of relation and function in the Quran with the Theme of Q.S. Ar-Rahman. West Science Islamic Studies, 1(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsiss.v1i01.309

Rahman, K. (2018). Perkembangan lembaga pendidikan Islam di Indonesia. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna: Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 1–14.

Rofiki, I. (2023). Dampak met-before dalam perkembangan kognisi. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 7(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v5i1.1800

Rosikhoh, D., & Abdussakir. (2020). Bilangan pecahan dan operasinya dalam hadits. JMPM: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v5i1.1800

Rosikhoh, D., Mardhiyatirrahmah, L., Abdussakir, Abtokhi, A., & Rofiki, I. (2019). Experienced teachers’ perceptions: Math-focused steam learning. Abjadia: International Journal of Education, 4(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.18860/abj.v4i2.8123

Safitri, W. Y., Haryanto, & Rofiki, I. (2020). Integrasi matematika, nilai-nilai keislaman, dan teknologi: Fenomena di madrasah tsanawiyah. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 3(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2020.3.1.89-104

Sofiyana, M. S. (2021). Pendampingan materi IPA terpadu untuk kompetisi sains madrasah di MTS Maarif NU 2 Sutojayan. Jurnal Pengabdian Al-Ikhlas, 7(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.31602/jpaiuniska.v7i1.5350

Subanji. (2015). Teori kesalahan konstruksi konsep dan pemecahan masalah matematika. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Subanji. (2016a). Teori berpikir pseudo penalaran kovariasional. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Subanji. (2016b). Teori defragmentasi struktur berpikir dalam mengonstruksi konsep dan pemecahan masalah matematika. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Sugilar, H., Rachmawati, T. K., & Nuraida, I. (2019). Integrasi interkoneksi matematika, agama, dan budaya. Jurnal Analisa, 5(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v5i2.6717

Sulistyawati, E., & Rofiki, I. (2022). Ethnomathematics and creativity study in the construction of batik based on fractal geometry aided by GeoGebra. International Journal on Teaching and Learning Mathematics, 5(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.18860/ijtlm.v5i1.10883

Supriyadi, K. (2020). Islamication efforts in learning mathematics. Al Amin: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Dan Budaya Islam, 3(02), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.36670/alamin.v3i02.70

Tsortanidou, X., Daradoumis, T., & Barberá-Gregori, E. (2023). Unplugged computational thinking at K-6 education: Evidence from a multiple-case study in Spain. Education 3-13, 51(6), 948–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2029924

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2003). Sistem pendidikan nasional. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

White, D. (2014). What is STEM education and why is it important? Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal, 1(14), 1–9.