DEVELOPMENT OF INQUIRI-BASED LEARNING DEVICES FOR TRAINING STUDENTS SCIENCE PROCESS ON MATERIAL ELASTICITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v7n2.p1455-1463Keywords:
science process skills, inquiry learning modelAbstract
This study aims to produce an inquiry-based physics learning device to train high school students science process skills on the subject of material elasticity. The research design uses Kemp model tested in three classes of class XI MIA- 1 , class XI MIA- 2 , and class XI MIA- 6 with total number of students of 90 in SMA Negeri 5 Ambon, second semester of academic year 2017/201 8. Group pretest-posttest design was used for test design. Data analysis techniques used include, 1) Qualitative descriptive analysis including validation result, readability level, Lesson plan implementation, students activity, learning constraints, science process skill result , and response. 2) Parametric statistical analysis includes: normality test, homogeneity test, and t-test. Finding showed that, 1) validity of learning tools developed is categorized as valid ; 2) the effectiveness of instructional tools in terms of: (a) the attainment of science process skills in the three classes obtained a significant increase in science process skill on each indicator studied by the researcher; (b) The student's response to the device and the learning implementation is very positive with the highest percentage is with teacher guidance when working on worksheet. Based on the finding, physics learning device by using inquiry model to train the students' science process skill which has been developed has met the criteria of validity, practicality, and effectiveness that it is feasible to be used to train students' science process skills on materials elasticityDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abruscato, J. (1992). Teaching Children Science 3rd. Needham heights: Allyn and Bacon.
Abruscato, J. (1996). Teaching Children Science Fourth Edition. Needham heights: Allyn and Bacon.
Aktamis, H., Ergin, O. (2008). The effect of scientific process skills educations on students scientific creativity, science attitudes and academic achievement. Asia-Pacific forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 9 (Juni 2008).
Arifin, Z. (2010). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Prinsip Teknik dan Prosedur. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Carin, A. A & Sund, R.B. (1989). Teaching Science Through Discovery 6nd. Merril publishing company: Columbus, Ohio.
Carin, A.A (1993). Teaching Science Through Discovery. United state of America: Macmillan Publishing Company
Dimyati (2002). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Gilliland, J. (1976). Readabbility. London: Horder and Stoughton.
Hake, Richard. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. (online). diperoleh dari http://www.physicsindiana.edu/sdi/Analyzing Change-Gain.pdf.
Harjasujana, A.S. dan Damaianti, V.S. (2003). Membaca dalam teori dan praktik. Bandung: Mutiara.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republic Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republic Indonesia.
Kemp, J. E., Morisson, G. R., and Ross, S.M. (1994). Design Effective Instruction. NY: Macmilan Collage Publishing Company.
Khishfe, R. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflexive versus implicit inquiry oriented instruction on sixth graders views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1(39), 551-578.
Nur, M. (2002). Keterampilan proses sains. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Prabowo. (2011). Metodologi penelitian (Sains dan Pendidikan Sains). Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Prahani, B.K., Soegimin, W.W., and Yuanita, L. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran fisika model inkuiri terbimbing untuk melatihkan keterampilan penyelesaian masalah berbasis multi representasi siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains, 4(2), 503-517.
Prahani, B.K., Nur, M., Yuanita, L., and Limatahu, I. (2016). Validitas model pembelajaran group science learning: Pembelajaran inovatif di Indonesia. Vidhya Karya, 31(1), 72-80.
Prahani, B.K., Suprapto, N., Suliyanah, Lestari, N.A., Jauhariyah, M.N.R, Admoko, S., and Wahyuni, S., (2018). The effectiveness of collaborative problem based physics learning (CPBPL) model to improve students self-confidence on physics learning. Journal Physics: Conference Series, 997(1), 012008.
Ratumanan, T.G dan Laurens T. (2011). Penilaian hasil belajar pada tingkat satuan pendidikan. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya Press.
Riduwan. (2012). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sadirman. A.M. 2011. Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Sanjaya Wina. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Setiawan. I.G.A.N. (1992). Pengaruh pembelajaran kontekstual dalam strategi inkuiri dan pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir dan penguasaan konsep biologi siswa SMP di kecamatan berleleng bali. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pasca Universitas Negeri Malang.
Sudijono Anas. 2012. Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kombinasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suwasono, P. (2011). Upaya meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa fisika angkatan tahun 2010/2011 offering m kelas g melalui penerapan pembelajaran fisika model inkuiri terbimbing. Jurnal Fisika dan Pembelajarannya. 15(1), 22-25.
Suyono dan Hariyanto. (2011). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung; PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Suyono dan Hariyanto. (2014). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Bandung; PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Taylor, W.L. (1953). Cloze procedure a new tool for measuring readability. Journal Quarterly. 30.
Abruscato, J. (1996). Teaching Children Science Fourth Edition. Needham heights: Allyn and Bacon.
Aktamis, H., Ergin, O. (2008). The effect of scientific process skills educations on students scientific creativity, science attitudes and academic achievement. Asia-Pacific forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 9 (Juni 2008).
Arifin, Z. (2010). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Prinsip Teknik dan Prosedur. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Carin, A. A & Sund, R.B. (1989). Teaching Science Through Discovery 6nd. Merril publishing company: Columbus, Ohio.
Carin, A.A (1993). Teaching Science Through Discovery. United state of America: Macmillan Publishing Company
Dimyati (2002). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Gilliland, J. (1976). Readabbility. London: Horder and Stoughton.
Hake, Richard. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. (online). diperoleh dari http://www.physicsindiana.edu/sdi/Analyzing Change-Gain.pdf.
Harjasujana, A.S. dan Damaianti, V.S. (2003). Membaca dalam teori dan praktik. Bandung: Mutiara.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republic Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republic Indonesia.
Kemp, J. E., Morisson, G. R., and Ross, S.M. (1994). Design Effective Instruction. NY: Macmilan Collage Publishing Company.
Khishfe, R. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflexive versus implicit inquiry oriented instruction on sixth graders views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1(39), 551-578.
Nur, M. (2002). Keterampilan proses sains. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Prabowo. (2011). Metodologi penelitian (Sains dan Pendidikan Sains). Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Prahani, B.K., Soegimin, W.W., and Yuanita, L. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran fisika model inkuiri terbimbing untuk melatihkan keterampilan penyelesaian masalah berbasis multi representasi siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains, 4(2), 503-517.
Prahani, B.K., Nur, M., Yuanita, L., and Limatahu, I. (2016). Validitas model pembelajaran group science learning: Pembelajaran inovatif di Indonesia. Vidhya Karya, 31(1), 72-80.
Prahani, B.K., Suprapto, N., Suliyanah, Lestari, N.A., Jauhariyah, M.N.R, Admoko, S., and Wahyuni, S., (2018). The effectiveness of collaborative problem based physics learning (CPBPL) model to improve students self-confidence on physics learning. Journal Physics: Conference Series, 997(1), 012008.
Ratumanan, T.G dan Laurens T. (2011). Penilaian hasil belajar pada tingkat satuan pendidikan. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya Press.
Riduwan. (2012). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sadirman. A.M. 2011. Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Sanjaya Wina. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Setiawan. I.G.A.N. (1992). Pengaruh pembelajaran kontekstual dalam strategi inkuiri dan pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir dan penguasaan konsep biologi siswa SMP di kecamatan berleleng bali. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pasca Universitas Negeri Malang.
Sudijono Anas. 2012. Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kombinasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suwasono, P. (2011). Upaya meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa fisika angkatan tahun 2010/2011 offering m kelas g melalui penerapan pembelajaran fisika model inkuiri terbimbing. Jurnal Fisika dan Pembelajarannya. 15(1), 22-25.
Suyono dan Hariyanto. (2011). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung; PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Suyono dan Hariyanto. (2014). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Bandung; PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
Taylor, W.L. (1953). Cloze procedure a new tool for measuring readability. Journal Quarterly. 30.
Downloads
Published
2018-06-26
How to Cite
Sopacua, V., Prabowo, P., & Sudibyo, E. (2018). DEVELOPMENT OF INQUIRI-BASED LEARNING DEVICES FOR TRAINING STUDENTS SCIENCE PROCESS ON MATERIAL ELASTICITY. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 7(2), 1455–1463. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v7n2.p1455-1463
Issue
Section
Articles
Abstract views: 347
,
PDF Downloads: 253
