Development of an E-Book Based on Local Wisdom of Fish Ponds in Gresik to Train Scientific Reasoning Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v12n3.p192-206Keywords:
E-Book, Education, Local Wisdom, Fish pond, Scientific ReasoningAbstract
Objective: Scientific reasoning is one of the most essential skills in learning biology and can be trained by integrating local wisdom. The lack of learning media that facilitates student learning causes low students' scientific reasoning skills. The development of learning media that integrates local wisdom is needed to train students' scientific reasoning. Method: The e-Book development procedure uses the ASSURE model which consists of six stages namely (1) analyze learner characteristics, (2) state objectives, (3) select, modify or design media, (4) utilize media, (5) requires learner responses, dan (6) evaluate. Data collection was collected by validation, observation, tests, and student response questionnaires. The One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design was implemented at Muhammadiyah 10 High School Surabaya for the 2022/2023 school year. Results: The results showed that (1) the developed e-book was valid with an average validity value of 93%, (2) learning implementation was 92.5% at the first meeting, and 81% at the second meeting with the high category, (3 ) student learning outcomes in the scientific reasoning indicator increased to 88% in probabilistic reasoning, 82% in theoretical reasoning, 80% in correlation reasoning and 79% in proportional reasoning, as well as the n-Gain calculation results which with high criteria and (4) positive student responses to the use of e-books. So that the developed e-book is feasible to use in terms of local wisdom potential, e-book validity, practicality, and e-book effectiveness. Novelty: The development of an e-book on ecosystem material with the integration of local wisdom from fish ponds to train scientific reasoning skills has never been done before.Downloads
References
Amin, J. N. (2016). Redefining the Role of Teachers in the Digital Era. International Journal of Indian Psychology 3(3). https://doi.org/10.25215/0303.101
Arikunto, S., (2014). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rinneka Cipta.
Askar, A. (2019). Interactive Ebooks as a Tool of Mobile Learning for Digital-Natives in Higher Education: Interactivity, Preferences, and Ownership. In: Proceedings of 42nd Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Las Vegas. https://members.aect.org/pdf/Proceedings/proceedings14/2014/14_02.pdf
Astuti, F. N., Suranto, S., & Masykuri, M. (2019). Augmented Reality for teaching science: Students’ problem-solving skill, motivation, and learning outcomes. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(2), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.8455
Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., Liu, Q., Ding, L., Cui, L., Luo, Y., Wang, Y., Li, E., & Wu, N. (2009). Physics: Learning and scientific reasoning. In Science (Vol. 323, Issue 5914, pp. 586–587). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167740
Bao, L., Xiao, Y., Koenig, K., & Han, J. (2018). Validity evaluation of the Lawson classroom test of scientific reasoning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020106
Bellens, K., Van den Noortgate, W., & Van Damme, J. (2020). The informed choice: mathematics textbook assessment in light of educational freedom, effectiveness, and improvement in primary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(2), 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1642215
Chang, R. C., & Yu, Z. S. (2018). Using augmented reality technologies to enhance students’ engagement and achievement in science laboratories. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 16(4), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2018100104
Dewi, N.P.S.R., Made Citra Wibawa, I., & Luh Pande Latria Devi, N. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Keterampilan Proses Dalam Pembelajaran Siklus Belajar 7e Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 6(1) https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i1.9476
Ding, L. (2018). Progression Trend of Scientific Reasoning from Elementary School to University: a Large-Scale Cross-Grade Survey Among Chinese Students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(8), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9844-0
Fadlilah, D. R., & Herlanti, Y. (2023). Analisis Pembelajaran Biologi SMA/MA di Jabodetabek Ditinjau dari Standar Proses. Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 15(2), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpkp.v15i1.527
Firdausi, E. A., Suyudi, A., Yuliati. (2020). Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Materi Elastisitas dan Hukum Hooke pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika), 5(2), 69–75. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jrpf/
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., & Ufer, S. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: Advancing an interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i3.96
Hadi, W.P., Khamsatul Muharrami, L., & Sri Utami, D. (2021). Identifikasi Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Berdasarkan Gender. Jurnal Matematika, Sains , dan Pembelajarannya. 15(2) https://doi.org/10.23887/wms.v15i2.34047
Hake, R. R. (1998). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores*. http://lists.asu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9903&L=aera-d&P=R6855
Hasanah, U. (2020). The Impacts of STEM Instruction on Strengthening High School Students’ Reasoning Skills. Science Education International, 31(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i3.6
Hu, Y. (2016). Research and development on e-book apps based on iOS development platform. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 369,395–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0072-0_51
Huang, Y. H., Wu, P. H., & Chiang, H. C. (2018). Effects of problem-solving strategy based interactive e-book on measurement concepts. Proceeding of 1st International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning, ICITL 2018 - Portoroz, Slovenia https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99737-7_48
Karplus, R. (1977). Position Papers Science Teaching and The Development of Reasoning*. In Journal of Research In Science Teaching (Vol. 14, Issue 2).
Kartini, K. S., Tri, N., & Putra, A. (2020). Respon Siswa Terhadap Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Android. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 4, 12–19. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPK/index
Kemdikbud. Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Biologi Fase E-F. Diakses melalui https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/kurikulum-merdeka/capaian-pembelajaran
Khan, A.K., & Rana, A.R. (2021). Effect of Higher Order Thinking Instructional Model on Scientific Reasoning of Grade VIII Students. Bulletin of Educational and Research, 43(1) 77-92. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1320877.pdf
Khoirina, M., Cari, C., & Sukarmin. (2018). Identify Students’ Scientific Reasoning Ability at Senior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012024
Lin, J. M., Chiou, C. W., Lee, C. Y., & Hsiao, J. R. (2015). Supporting physical agents in an interactive e-book. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 388, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23207-2_24
Luo, M., Wang, Z., Sun, D., Wan, Z. H., & Zhu, L. (2020). Evaluating scientific reasoning ability: The design and validation of an assessment with a focus on reasoning and the use of evidence. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.261
Mayer, D., Sodian, B., Koerber, S., & Schwippert, K. (2014). Scientific reasoning in elementary school children: Assessment and relations with cognitive abilities. Learning and Instruction, 29, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.005
Meister, S., & Upmeier Zu Belzen, A. (2021). Analysis of data-based scientific reasoning from a product-based and a process-based perspective. Education Sciences, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100639
Mufaikah A. (2019). Pengaruh Metode Diskusi Berbantukan Media Audiovisual Terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas VII MTS Makkaraeng. In Jurnal Binomial, 2(2). https://www.ejournals.umma.ac.id/index.php/binomial/article/view/285
Novia, N., & Riandi, R. (2017). The analysis of students scientific reasoning ability in solving the modified lawson classroom test of scientific reasoning (MLCTSR) problems by applying the levels of inquiry. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9600
Nugraha, M. G., Kirana, K. H., Utari, S., Kurniasih, N., Nurdini, N., & Sholihat, F. N. (2017). Problem Solving-Based Experiment untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Penalaran Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03203
Nurdiani, N., Rustaman, N. Y., Setiawan, W., & Priyandoko, D. (2019). Reasoning patterns and modes of prospective biology teachers on embryology learning with TPACK framework. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7375
Nurmilawati, M., & Rahmawati, I. (2021). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pembelajaran Diskusi Kelompok Berbasis Lesson Study. Proceeding of SEMDIKJAR (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. https://proceeding.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/semdikjar/article/view/1500
Parwati, N. N., Tegeh, I. M., & Mariawan, I. M. (2018). Integrating the Values of Local Wisdom into the Learning Model: Building Positive Student Character. In Educational Technology to Improve Quality and Access on a Global Scale (pp. 297–307). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66227-5_23
Polikoff, M. S., Campbell, S. E., Rabovsky, S., Koedel, C., Le, Q. T., Hardaway, T., & Gasparian, H. (2020). The formalized processes districts use to evaluate mathematics textbooks. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(4), 451–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1747116
Putri, R.A., Susantini, E., & Taufikurohmah, T. (2021). The Results Presentation of The Test Plants As A Natural Indicator of The Test Compounds of The Acid-Base Balance In the Teaching Materials of The Atlas to Train Scientific Reasoning Students. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(3), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i3.116
Ramdani, A., & Wahab Jufri, A. (2021). Pelatihan Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Android Sebagai Sumber Belajar untuk Guru dan Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pengabdian Magister Pendidikan IPA, 4(4) https://doi.org/10.29303/jpmpi.v4i4.1026
Retnawati, Heri. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). Parama Publishing.
Rusli, M., & Antonius, L. (2019). Meningkatkan Kognitif Siswa SMAN I Jambi Melalui Modul Berbasis E-Book Kvisoft Flipbook Maker. Jurnal Sistem Komputer Dan Informatika (JSON), 1(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.30865/json.v1i1.1397
Sari, W. N., Yamin, M., & Khairuddin, K. (2023). Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) dengan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Berbantuan Power Point terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 1 Batukliang Tahun 2022. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(1), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i1.1122
Shofiyah, N., Fitria, D., & Wulandari, E. (2018). Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) dalam Melatih Scientific Reasoning Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA 8(1) http://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jppipa
Sudjono.(2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Susantini, E., Puspitawati, R. P., Raharjo, & Suaidah, H. L. (2021). E-book of metacognitive learning strategies: design and implementation to activate student’s self-regulation. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00161-z
Sürücü, L., & Maslakçi, A. (2020). Validity and Reliability in Quantitative Research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694–2726. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
Swanson, P. (2014). The power of belief: Spanish teachers’ sense of efficacy and student performance on the National Spanish Examinations. Hispania, 97(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2014.0015
Tosun, N. (2014). A Study on Reading Printed Books or E-Books: Reasons for Student-Teachers Preferences. In TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1018172.pdf
Tsai, M. C., Lin, H. C. K., & Lin, C. (2018). Usability evaluation of the game based e-book system on natural science teaching system. Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2018. 11003 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99737-7_49
Vaesen, K., & Houkes, W. (2021). A new framework for teaching scientific reasoning to students from application-oriented sciences. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00379-0
Wu, H.-L., Weng, H.-L., & She, H.-C. (2016). Effects of Scaffolds and Scientific Reasoning Ability On Web-Based Scientific Inquiry Effects of Scaffolds and Scientific Reasoning Ability On Web-Based Scientific Inquiry. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 3(1), 12–24. www.ijcer.net
Wulandari, I., & Kunci, K. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD ( Student Teams Achievement Division) dalam Pembelajaran MI. In Jurnal Papeda 4(1).
Yanto, B. E., Subali, B., & Suyanto, S. (2019). Improving students’ scientific reasoning skills through the three levels of inquiry. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 689–704. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12444a
Yediarani, R. D., Maison, M., & Syarkowi, A. (2019). Scientific Reasoning Abilities Profil of Junior High School Students in Jambi. Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 3(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v3i1.627
Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Anand, H., Toepper, M., & Lautenbach, C. (2020). Student Learning in German Higher Education: Innovative Measurement Approaches and Research Results. Springer VS Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27886-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.