Profile of Computational Thinking Skills in Environmental Chemistry Courses for Prospective Science Teacher Students

Emilia Candrawati; Mellyta Uliyandari; Nuryani Y. Rustaman; Ida Kaniawati

doi:10.26740/jpps.v11n2.p152-165

Authors

Emilia Candrawati Universitas Bengkulu
Mellyta Uliyandari Universitas Bengkulu
Nuryani Y. Rustaman Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Ida Kaniawati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v11n2.p152-165

Keywords:

Computational thinking, Environmental chemistry course, Field study

Abstract

Computational thinking skills are not only provided to students in computer-related courses, but also in all courses, including Environmental Chemistry courses. Environmental chemistry courses are considered important because they orient students to the achievement of scientific literacy and awareness. Therefore, optimization of learning in environmental chemistry courses also needs to be carried out to support the achievement of CPL which includes 21st-century life skills, including computational thinking skills. science teacher candidates. The research method follows 3 stages of field study, namely preparation, data collection, and data analysis. The results of the study show that the Science Education Study Program has poured CT skills into CPL, environmental chemistry lectures are still dominated by theoretical explanations by lecturers, lecturers do not understand the concept of CT, and CT skills are very important to provide students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anistyasari, Y., Ekohariadi, & Munoto. (2020). Strategi pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan keterampilan pemrograman dan berpikir komputasi: Sebuah studi literatur. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 2(2), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.26740/jvte.v2n2.p37-44

Bandur, A. (2016). Penelitian kualitatif: Metodologi, desain, dan teknik analisa data dengan nvivo 11 plus. Jakarta: Deepublish Press.

Barr, D.H., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38, 20-23.

Denning, P.J. (2017). Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communication of The ACM, 60(6), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998438

Cahyo, A. N. (2011). Gudang permainan kreatif khusus asah otak kiri anak. Yogyakarta: FlashBooks.

Chongo, S., Osman, K., & Nayan, A.N. (2021). Impact of the Pulgged-in and Unplugged Chemistry Computational Thinking Modul on Achievement in Chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10789

CSTA. (2011). Computational thinking teacher resources. National Science Foundation Under Grant.

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2018). Computational thinking: A competency whose time has come. in s. sentance, e. barendsen & c. schulte (Eds.) London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Hunsaker, E. (2020). The K-12 educational technology handbook. EdTechBook.

Junaedi, A. (2020). Buku panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi di era industri 4.0 untuk mendukung merdeka belajar-kampus merdeka (ke-4 ed.). Jakarta: Direktorat Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan, Dirjen Dikti, Kemendikbud.

Kalelioğlu, F. (2018). Characteristics of Studies Conducted on Computational Thinking: A content analysis, in computational thinking in the STEM disciplines foundations and research highlights, ed. myint swe khine. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Kemendikbud RI. (2020). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan republik indonesia nomor 3 tahun 2020 tentang standar nasional pendidikan tinggi. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kraska, T. (2020). Establishing a connection for students between the reacting system and particle model with games and stochastic simulations of the arrhenius equation. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(7), 1951-1959. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00081

León, J.M., González, M.R., & Robles, G. (2018). On computational thinking as a universal skill. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363437

Lutfi, A., Suyono, Erman, & Hidayah, R. (2019). Edutainment with computer game as chmistry learning media. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains, 8(2), 1684-1689. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v8n2.p1684-1689

Moon, J., Do, J., Lee, D., & Choi, G.W. (2020). A conceptual framework for teaching computational thinking in personalized OERs. Smart Learning Environments, 7(6), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0108-z

Mulyani, E. (2016). Pengaruh penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe student facilitator and explaining terhadap pemahaman matematik peserta didik. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Matematika, 2(1), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.37058/jp3m.v2i1.151

Ngoc, T.H., Nhan, P.V., Son, H.D., Ai Duc, T.T., & Nam, T.G. (2020). Lecturer professional development strategies in a higher education institution in ha tinh province at a time of educational reforms. Eucational Studies Moscow, 2, 128-151. 10.17323/1814-9545-2020-2-128-151

Peel, A., Sadler, T.D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2021). Using unplagged computational thinking to scaffold natural selection learning. The American Biology Teacher, 83(2), 112-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/abt.2021.83.2.112

Riva, I. (2012). Koleksi games edukatif di dalam dan luar sekolah. Yogyakarta: FlashBooks.

Rizki, & Putra, W. Y. (2019). Pengembangan bahan ajar gamifikasi matematika siswa MTs. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 12(1).

http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v12i1.4865

Schunk, D.H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective (teori-teori pembelajaran: perspektif pendididkan) (ke-6 ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Widianto, S. (2020). Korelasi motivasi, fasilitas belajar, dan prestasi belajar siswa. Awwaliyah: Jurnal PGMI, 3(1), 47-56.

Wing, J.M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.

Wing, J.M. (2011). Computational thinking’s influence on research and education for all. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/922

Yakin, Q.R., Suwindra, I. P., & Mardana, I. P. (2018). Pengembangan media pembelajaran game edukasi fisika untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan prestasi belajar siswa pada materi gerak-gerak lurus beraturan, berubah beraturan, dan jatuh bebas. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Undiksha, 8(2), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpf.v8i2.20634

Yusoff, K.M., Ashaari, N.S., Wook, T.M., & Ali, N.M. (2021). Validation PF the components and elements of computational thinking for teaching and learning programming using the fuzzy delphi method. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 12(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120111

Zhong, B., Wang, Q., Chen, J., & Li, Y. (2016). An exploration of three-dimensional integrated assessment for computational thinking. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(4), 562-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735633115608444