COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN INQUIRY LAB AND GUIDED INQUIRY LEARNING MODELS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS

Jumilah Jumilah; Budi Jatmiko; Eko Hariyono

doi:10.26740/jpps.v11n1.p12-26

Authors

Jumilah Jumilah Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Budi Jatmiko Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Eko Hariyono Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v11n1.p12-26

Keywords:

Conventional, Guided inquiry, HOTs, Laboratory inquiry

Abstract

The research aims to describe the improvement of students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTs) and compare the differences in effectiveness between the two levels of the inquiry learning model. Two types of learning model levels were applied in this research, namely the Inquiry Lab and Guided Inquiry learning models. This research took place on Fluid Mechanics material on 11^th grade of Islamic Senior High School Samarinda. The samples were 108 students out of all students at school as the population. The data obtained were then analyzed using N-gain and inferential statistics. The results showed that the students' HOTS increased significantly with a significance level of 5% after the Inquiry Lab and Guided Inquiry learning model was applied. Based on the calculation of N-gain, there was an increase for the class of 11^th Science 2 with very high category (98%), class of 11^th Science 1 with high category (83.62%), and a class of 11^th Science 3 with low category (34%). Hence, the 11^th Science 3 class was statistically significantly different (consistent). The implications of this research for universities include that the curricula for university courses should focus more on mini-research activities, especially those related to open inquiry. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the effectiveness between the two levels of inquiry and conventional strategies in improving higher-order thinking skills. There are significant differences between the two levels of inquiry, namely Laboratory Inquiry learning and Guided Inquiry itself. The most significant in improving students' HOTs is Laboratory Inquiry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing instructional design to improve mathematical high order thinking of skills students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), 012100. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012100

Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creating twenty-first-century self-determined learners. In The future of ubiquitous learning (pp. 25–40). Springer.

Cao, T. H. (2018). Teachers’ capacity of instruction for developing higher-order thinking skills for upper secondary students–a case study in teaching mathematics in Vietnam. Revista Românească Pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 10(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/33.

Chukwuyenum, A. N. (2013). Impact of critical thinking on performance in mathematics among senior secondary school students in Lagos State. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 3(5), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0351825

Ernita, N., Muin, A., Verawati, N., & Prayogi, S. (2021). The effect of inquiry learning model based on laboratory and achievement motivation toward students’ physics learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1816, 12090. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1816/1/012090

Faishol, A. (2016). Pengaruh sistem pengendalian intern terhadap Kualitas laporan keuangan (studi kasus pada satuan kerja perangkat daerah Pemerintah Kabupaten lamongan). Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi dan Akuntansi (JPENSI), 1(3), 205-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.30736%2Fjpensi.v1i3.85

Fensham, P. J., & Bellocchi, A. (2013). Higher-order thinking in chemistry curriculum and its assessment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.003

Ferina, Y. A. (2020). Students’ responses to the implementation of guided inquiry model integrated with volcanic disaster mitigation on physics learning. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), 5-9. https://jurnal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/5/article/view/31583 s

Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21-st century skills: Methods and approach. New York: Springer.

Hanekom, R., Venter, I., & Du Toit, L. D. (2014). Development of a food knowledge test for first-year students at a university of technology in the Western Cape, South Africa. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 42, 1-16. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jfecs/article/view/102146

Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., & Suwandi, T. (2020). Implementation supplementary book of green consumerism: Improving students HOTs in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.227

Jailani, J., & Sugiman, S. (2018). Desain pembelajaran matematika: Untuk melatihkan higher order thinking skills (HOTs). Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan.

Khasanah, N., Sajidan, S., & Prayitno, B. A. (2017). Implementation of discovery learning model with integrated unity of sciences in the development of critical thinking skills and personal religious beliefs (PRB) of students. Man India, 97(19), 353–361. https://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/id/eprint/13429

King, F. J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2015). Higher-order thinking skills: Definitions, strategies, assessment. Assessment & Evaluation Education Services Program. http://www.cala.fsu.edu/files/higher_order_thinking_skills.pdf

Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. California: Abc-Clio.

Llewellyn, D. (2013). Teaching high school science through inquiry and argumentation. New York: Corwin Press.

Manoli, C., Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., Jong, T. D., Riesen, S. A.N., Kamp, E. T., Zacharia, C. Z., and Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Massouleh, N. S., & Jooneghani, R. B. (2012). Learner-centered instruction: A critical perspective. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(6), 50–59. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/1637

Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: Validity and reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 17(4), 59–82. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/83458

Murphy, C., Bianchi, L., McCullagh, J., & Kerr, K. (2013). Scaling up higher-order thinking skills and personal capabilities in primary science: Theory-into-policy-into-practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.005

Mauludiah C., & Novita, D. (2021). Creative thinking skills in sub material factor affecting the rate of reaction with the application of online-based worksheets on guided inquiry. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 10(2), 1983–1995. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v0n0.p%25p

Nuraida, D. (2019). Peran guru dalam mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa dalam proses pembelajaran. Jurnal Teladan: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 51–60.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation Development. (2019). Education in Indonesia: Rising to the Challenge. New York: OECD Publishing.

Öztürk, F. Ö. (2016). Using the history of science to teach scientific inquiry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.28

Prabasari, I. G. A. M., Martini, L. K. B., & Suardika, N. (2018). The effect of communication and employee engagement on organizational citizenship behavior and employee performance in employees PT. PLN (Persero) distribution of Bali. International Journal of Contemporary Research and Review, 9(08), 21014–21025. https://doi.org/10.15520/ijcrr/2018/9/08/586

Prayitno, B. A., Corebima, D., Susilo, H., Zubaidah, S., & Ramli, M. (2017). Closing the science process skills gap between students with high and low level academic achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 266-277. https://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.266

Prayitno, B. A., & Suciati, T. (2018). Enhancing students' higher-order thinking skills in science through instad strategy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 1046-1055. https://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.1046

Putri, R. S. W., & Ayu, D. S. (2018). Analisis volume limpasan dengan metode Green-AMPT. Jurnal Nasional Teknologi Terapan (JNTT), 2(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.22146/jntt.42774

Sarwanti, S. (2016). Scientific method in English language teaching. Transformatika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 60–75. https://jurnal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/transformatika/article/view/200

Siew, N. M., Chan, M. K., & Sombuling, A. (2017). The effects of problem based learning with cooperative learning on preschoolers' scientific creativity. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(1), 100-112. https://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.100

Swestyani, S., Masykuri, M., Prayitno, B. A., Rinanto, Y., & Widoretno, S. (2018). An analysis of logical thinking using mind mapping. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022(1), 12020. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012020

Tanujaya, B., Mumu, J., & Margono, G. (2017). The relationship between higher-order thinking skills and academic performance of student in mathematics instruction. International Education Studies, 10(11), 78–85. https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n11p78

Tejada, J. J., & Punzalan, J. R. B. (2012). On the misuse of Slovin’s formula. The Philippine Statistician, 61(1), 129–136. https://www.psai.ph/tps_details.php?id=26

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253

Upasana, K. M. (2014). A comparative study of traditional education: Education with special reference to India. International Journal of Research in Business Management, 2(5), 149–162.

Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided-inquiry laboratory experiments on science education students’ chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety and achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, s(4), 217–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395

Vijayaratnam, P. (2012). Developing higher-order thinking skills and team commitment via group problem solving: A bridge to the real world. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 53–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.247

Wahyudi, N., Ayub, S., & Prayogi, S. (2018). Development of inquiry-creative-process learning model to promote critical thinking ability of physics prospective teachers. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1108(1), 012005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012005

Wang, J., & Jou, M. (2016). Qualitative investigation on the views of inquiry teaching based upon the cloud learning environment of high school physics teachers from Beijing, Taipei, and Chicago. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 212–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.003

Windiastuti, E. P., Suyono, S., & Kuntjoro, S. (2018). Development of the guided inquiry student worksheet for biology grade 11th senior high school. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 7(2), 1513–1518. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v7n2.p1513-1518