Peran Pendidikan dan Ilmu Pengetahuan di Era Digital dalam Perspektif Berpikir Kritis Norman Fairclough

Main Article Content

Putri Retnosari
Endah Imawati

Abstract

The research with the title “The Role of Education and Science in the Digital Age in the
perspective of Norman Fairclough's Critical Thinking Teaching” is motivated by the challenges
faced by the world of education and science in the increasingly complex digital era, which is not
only in the form of competition for express teaching models, but also human interest in false
truths and information. The critical thinking teaching method offered by Fairclough opens new
horizons for the world of education and science so as not to be trapped by offers of
sophistication and sophistication alone, because developments in the digital era are also
realized to have a negative impact on humans. This research is qualitative research using the
literature method. The formal object in this research is Norman Fairclough's critical thinking
teaching method, while the material object used in this research is the basic concept of
education and science. After conducting a search in this study, the results obtained are (1) the
formulation of critical thinking on the concepts of education and science (2) finding the role of
education and science of education in the digital era by involving five basic concepts initiated
by Fairclough, namely action, context, history, power and ideology.

Article Details

How to Cite
Retnosari, P., & Imawati, E. (2024). Peran Pendidikan dan Ilmu Pengetahuan di Era Digital dalam Perspektif Berpikir Kritis Norman Fairclough. Jurnal Pena Indonesia, 10(3), 30–41. Retrieved from https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/38199
Section
Articles

References

Bahm, J. Archie. 1980. What is “Science”?. Albuquerque: World Books.

Fairclough, N. 1995. Kesadaran Bahasa Kritis. Longman Singapore Publishers: Singapura ___________. 1955. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Pearson____________2001. Language and Power Second Edition. Pearson Education Limitid: London

Franz Magniz-Suseno. 1991. Etika Sosial. Gramedia: Jakarta

Hadi, Hardono. 1994. Epistemologi: Filsafat Pengetahuan. Pustaka Filsafat: Yogyakarta

Kaelan. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif bidang Filsafat. Paradigma: Yogyakarta

Koento Wibisono. Skema kelahiran dan Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan– filsafat pengetahuan– filsafat ilmu (hand out) Koento Wibisono. 1992. Dinamika Ekonomi dan IPTEK

Poespoprodjo, W. 1997. Aktualitas Filsafat Ilmu Kemasakan– Ke Arah Praktek dan Pengelolaan Ilmu. Universitas Padjajaran

Salam, Burhanuddin. 1997. Logika Materiil Filsafat Pengetahuan. Rineka Ilmu Cipta: Jakarta

Saleh, firdaus. 2005. Teknologi tepat guna, masyarakat dan kebudayaan: suatu pendekatan yang diterapkan pada agribisnis usaha kecil menengah. Kreasi Wacana: Bandung

Santosa, Heru. 2000. Landasan etis bagi perkembangan teknologi (Studi Kebijakan pemakaian bahan bakar migas). PT. Tiara Wacana Yogya: Yogyakarta

Zen,M.T, (Editor). Teknologi 1982. Sains dan Hari Depan Manusia. Gramedia: Yogyakarta

Haryatmoko,. 2016. Critical Discourse Analysis (Analisis Wacana Kritis) Landasan Teori, Metodelogi dan Penerapan. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada language PT. assessment literacy for in-service EFL teachers: The gaps. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61(8), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2 019.03.003 Literacy Skills and Teachers. (2011). Lu, D., & Xie, Y. N. (2024). The development of EFL preservice teachers’ critical thinking in teaching practicum: a case study. Professional Education, Development 00(00), in 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2 024.2364322

Rabbianty, E. N., Raihany, A., Syafik, M., Muqoddas, N., Irwansyah, H., Rahmawati, F., & Febrianingrum, L. (2022). Pemahaman Mahasiswa Terhadap Literasi Lingkungan (Ekoliterasi): Potensi dan Tantangan Menuju Kampus Ramah Lingkungan. Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan, 10(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.36052/andragogi. v10i2.302

Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3518