IDENTIFY MISCONCEPTION ON REACTION RATE CONCEPT USING FOUR-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICE (4TMC) DIAGNOSTIC TEST INSTRUMENT

Authors

  • Ilham Pradana Putra Harahap Chemistry Department, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, State University of Surabaya
  • Dian Novita Chemistry Department, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, State University of Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v5n1.p6-11

Keywords:

four-tier multiple choice, misconception, reaction rate

Abstract

Abstract. The aims of this study to identify  the profile of students  conseptions and misconceptions on the concept of reaction rate using a four-tier multiple choice diagnostic test instrument reported in the form of misconception profiles consisting of students' conceptions, students' misconceptions and the causes of misconceptions experienced by students. Based on the results of the study shown (1) the students conception profile is as much as 78% understand the concept, 21% misconceptions and 1% do not understand the concept, (2) the profile of students misconceptions in each sub-material that misconceptions on sub-material of concentration 16%, temperature 19%, surface area 41% and catalyst 24% and as many as 1 student (3%) including the high misconception category, 22 students (67%) included in the medium misconception category and 10 students (30%) were in the low misconception category. Students misconceptions vary in different causes such as; associative thinking 59%, preconceptions 25%, incomplete resoning 13%, humanistic thinking 2% and incorrect intuition 1% .

 

Keywords: four-tier multiple choice, misconception, reaction rate

Author Biographies

Ilham Pradana Putra Harahap, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, State University of Surabaya

Chemistry Department, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, State University of Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia

Dian Novita, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, State University of Surabaya

Chemistry Department, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, State University of Surabaya

References

[1] Permendikbud No 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah
[2] Suparno, Paul. 2001. Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
[3] Ibrahim, Muslimin. 2012. Seri Pembelajaran Inovatif: Konsep, Miskonsepsi dan Cara Pembelajarannya. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
[4] Treagust, D. 2006. "Diagnostic Assessment in Science as a Means to Improving Teaching, Learning and Retention". In UniServe Science Assessment Symposium, Sep 28, 2006, Sydney, NSW: UniServe Science, The University of Sydney
[5] Siswaningsih, W., Anisa, N., Komalasari, N E., & Indah R. 2014. Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Kimia Peserta didik SMA. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 19(1), 117-127.
[6] Depdiknas. 2007. Tes Diagnostik, Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
[7] Lin, S. 2004. Development and Application of a Two-Tier Diagnostic Test for High School Students' Understanding of Sowering Plant Growth and Development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics, 2(2), 175-199.
[8] Fariyani, Q., Rusilowati, A., & Sugianto. 2015. Pengembangan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test untuk Mengungkap Miskonsepsi Fisika Peserta didik SMA Kelas X. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 4(2), 41-49
[9] Arikunto Suharsimi. 2005. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
[10] Pajaindo, O P., Prayitno, & Fajaroh, F. 2013. Menggali Pemahaman Siswa SMA pada Konsep Laju Reaksi dengan Menggunakan Instrumen Diagnostik Two-Tier. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 2(2), 1-6

Downloads

Published

2021-06-29
Abstract views: 326 , PDF Downloads: 432 , PDF Downloads: 0