VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT SHEETS FOR IDENTIFYING CONCEPTIONS AND ARGUMENTATION SKILLS IN CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUM MATERIALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v8n1.p1-8Keywords:
Concept Identification, Argumentation Skills, Chemical Equilibrium, R&D, ADDIEAbstract
This research aims to determine the validity of the conceptual identification assessment sheet and argumentation skills on chemical equilibrium material. This research uses the Research and Development type of research. The development model uses the ADDIE model by applying the Analyze, Design and Develop stages. The research subject is SMAN 16 Surabaya. Later, this research will use qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The validation results of the product validity assessment show that the data on the material aspect is in the very good category which is get mode score 4, the construct aspect is in the good category which is get mode score 3, and the language aspect is in the good category which is get mode score 4. The results of the teacher's response to the assessment instruments developed are good and can be used.
References
Reksa A.P, Dinda P.S, Faloh A. (2022). Pendekatan Saintifik untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad 21 pada Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Kependidikan Dasar. Juni, 9(1), 43–56.
Widhi, M. T. W., Hakim, A. R., Wulansari, N. I., Solahuddin, M. I., & Admoko, S. (2021). Analisis keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik pada model pembelajaran berbasis toulmin’s argumentation pattern (TAP) dalam memahami konsep fisika dengan metode library research. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.33369/Pendipa.5.1.79-91
Winarni, S. (2016). Miskonsepsi Kimia yang Disebabkan Pernyataan Nonproposisi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 4(4), 122–129.
Savira, Intan., et al. 2019. Desain Instrumen Tes Three Tiers Multiple Choice Untuk Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Terkait Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13 (1): 2277 – 2286.
Treagust, D., & Tsui, Chi-Yan. 2010. Evaluating Secondary Student’s Scientific Reasoning in Genetics Using a Two-Tier diagnostic Instrument. International Jurnal of Science Education, 32(8): 1073-1098.
Agustin, Utami., Endang, Sulasiningsih., Sri Nurhayati., & Nanik Wijayanti. 2022. Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Four Tier Multiple Choice Untuk Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia. Journal of Chemistry In Education, 11(1).
Zaroh, I., Muntholib, M., & Joharmawan, R. (2022). Implementasi instrumen asesmen argumentasi ilmiah materi laju reaksi. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 6(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.19109/ojpk.v6i1.12191
Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Bandung : IKAPI.
Fariyani, Qitshi., Ani, Rusilowati., & Sugianto. 2015. Pengembangan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Untuk Mengungkap Miskonsepsi Fisika Siswa Sma Kelas X. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 4(2).
Toulmin, Stephen. 2003. The Uses of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Abstract views: 23
,
PDF Downloads: 21
