ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' SCIENCE LITERACY ON BUFFER SOLUTION MATERIAL IN PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL 2 MUARA BADAK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v9n2.p81-88Keywords:
analysis, science literacy, quantitative descriptive methodAbstract
Scientific literacy can be understood as students’ capacity to apply scientific knowledge, recognize problems, and formulate conclusions based on evidence. This study was conducted to examine the level of scientific literacy among students at SMA Negeri 2 Muara Badak. A descriptive quantitative research design was selected because the purpose was to portray a single variable independently without linking it to other variables. The research population comprised all eleventh-grade science students at SMA Negeri 2 Muara Badak. Using a saturated sampling technique, all students from three classes XI IPA 1, XI IPA 2, and XI IPA 3, were included, totaling 77 participants. Data were gathered through literacy test instruments as well as non-test methods, including observation sheets, student response questionnaires, and interviews. The results indicated that students’ scientific literacy was still within the moderate category, with an achievement percentage of 67.45%. Several factors contributed to this outcome, such as students’ limited reading habits related to science, their relatively weak comprehension of subject matter, and instructional processes that tended to be teacher-centered rather than promoting independent inquiry and conceptual engagement.
References
[1] Mardhiyah, R. H., Aldriani, S. N. F., Chitta, F., & Zulfikar, M. R. (2021). Pentingnya Keterampilan Belajar di Abad 21 sebagai Tuntutan dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 187–193.
[2] Sutrisna, N. (2021a). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik SMA Di Kota Sungai Penuh. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(12), 2683–3691.
[3] Fuadi, H., Robbia, A. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Jufri, A. W. (2020a). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 108–116.
[4] Priyasmika, R., & Yuliana, I. F. (2021). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Model on Higher Order Thinking Skills Reviewed from Chemical Literacy. JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 5(2), 70-76.
[5] Suja, I. W. (2022). Revitalisasi Etnosains untuk Mendukung Literasi. BCSJ: Bivalen Chemical Studies Journal, 5(1), 1–10.
[6] OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving (Revised Edition). In OECD Publishing.
[7] Arohman, M., Saefudin, & Priyandoko, D. (2016). Kemampuan Literasi Sains Pada Pembelajaran Ekosistem. Jurnal FMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(1), 90–92.
[8] Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment: Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Golden Age, 4(01), 30–41.
[9] Yusmaita, E., Yuliani, F., & Gazali, F. (2022). Analysis of Chemical Literacy Instrument on Oxidation and Reduction Reactions Material by Using Rasch Model. JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 6(2), 124-130.
[10] Kurnia, F., Zulherman, & Fathurohman, A. (2014). Analisis Bahan Ajar Fisika Sma Kelas Xi Di Kecamatan Indralaya Utara Berdasarkan Kategori Literasi Sains. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1), 43–47.
[11] Sumarni, W., Prasida, H. Wi., & Sumarti, S. susilogati. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian kemampuan kognitif dan afektif berbasis literasi sains pada materi larutan penyangga. Nature Methods, 7(6), 2016.
[12] Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21 dengan Literasi Sains Siswa. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 9(1), 34–42.
[13] Arma, A. F., Kusumawardani, R., & Widiyowati, I. I. (2019). Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle 5e Berbasis Start with a Question Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA pada Materi Larutan Penyangga. Bivalen: Chemical Studies Journal, 2(1), 13–15.
[14] Rofifah, D. (2018). Seminar Nasional Guru Dikdas Berprestasi “Membangun Keteladanan Guru Pendidikan Dasar untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Abad 21” Bagian II. In Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents.
[15] Arikunto. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.
[16] Usman, U., Sari, A., & Nurhadi, M. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA Kelas X pada Pokok Bahasan Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit dengan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri. Seminar Nasional Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia, 19–23.
[17] OECD. (2023). PISA 2025 Science Framework (draft). In OECD Publishing.
[18] Pantiwati, Y. (2017). Kemampuan Literasi dan Teknik Literasi. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (Jep), 3(01), 10.
[19] Jufrida, J., Basuki, F. R., Pangestu, M. D., & Djati Prasetya, N. A. (2019). Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Hasil Belajar IPA dan Literasi Sains di SMP Negeri 1 Muaro Jambi. EduFisika, 4(02), 31–38.
[20] Nofiana, M. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP di Kota Purwokerto Ditinjau dari Aspek Konten, Proses, dan Konteks Sains. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Humaniora), 1(2), 77.
[21] Sari, R. K., Melati, H. A., Erlina, E., Enawaty, E., & Hadi, L. (2022). Profil kemampuan literasi kimia mahasiswa pendidikan kimia Universitas Tanjungpura. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 10(1), 25–34.
[22] Ültay, N., & Çalık, M. (2012). A Thematic Review of Studies into the Effectiveness of Context-Based Chemistry Curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 686–701.
[23] Rusilowati, A. (2014). Analisis Buku Ajar IPA yang Digunakan Di Semarang Berdasarkan Muatan Literasi Sains. Seminar Nasional Konservasi Dan Kualitas Pendidikan 2014, 6–10.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 3
,
PDF Downloads: 3
