Physics Learning Utilizing VIRRIC (Virtual Reality Hydroelectric): Effects on Students' Learning Outcomes and Experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jdpe.v2i1.52253Keywords:
Hydroelectric, Learning Outcome, Physics Learning, Renewable Energy, Virtual RealityAbstract
Objective: This study explores the impact of physics learning using VR-based media on students' learning outcomes and learning experiences. This study also examined gender differences in gains. Method: This study uses the one-group pre-test and post-test methods to measure learning outcomes and a questionnaire to determine student responses. These student responses assess how students experience learning after using the Virtual Reality Hydroelectric (VIRRIC) media. This paper reports on the design, implementation, and impact of applying VIRRIC. VIRRIC was created using MilleaLab Creator software, a VR platform inspired by the Karangkates Hydroelectric Power Plant. The inspiration for this real renewable energy product is to support students in contributing to SDG 7. VIRRIC was tested in science class learning, and 30 high school students were tested. Results: The trial results showed that 93% of students had a moderate n-gain (average n-gain = 0.433), indicating a decent increase in learning outcomes before and after using VIRRIC. In addition, the application of VIRRIC was well received by the students, with a questionnaire score of 0.76, indicating that they had good learning experiences in physics through VIRRIC. Both results show a positive correlation between STEM activities using VIRRIC and students' learning outcomes and learning experiences. Therefore, VIRRIC can be a medium for teaching, particularly on the renewable energy topic. Novelty: This study provides scientific evidence of VR technology's effectiveness in supporting physics learning. It provides empirical evidence of how conventional physics learning can be transformed into digitalization using VR.
References
Agusty, A. I., & Anggaryani, M. (2021). Teaching global warming with millealab virtual reality. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v9i2.5084
Alrikabi, N. K. M. A. (2014). Renewable energy types. Journal of Clean Energy Technologies, 2(1), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.7763/jocet.2014.v2.92
Ang, T. Z., Salem, M., Kamarol, M., Das, H. S., Nazari, M. A., & Prabaharan, N. (2022). A comprehensive study of renewable energy sources: Classifications, challenges and suggestions. Energy Strategy Reviews, 43(August), 100939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100939
Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (3rd ed.). Bumi Aksara.
Asad, M. M., Naz, A., Churi, P., & Tahanzadeh, M. M. (2021). Virtual reality as pedagogical tool to enhance experiential learning: A systematic literature review. Education Research International, 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7061623
Awad, N. (2021). Exploring STEM integration : assessing the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary informal program in fostering students ’ performance and inspiration Exploring STEM integration : assessing the effectiveness of an. Research in Science & Technological Education, 00(00), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1931832
Boda, P. A., & Brown, B. (2020). Priming urban learners’ attitudes toward the relevancy of science: A mixed-methods study testing the importance of context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(4), 567–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21604
Brahma, M., Rejula, M. A., Srinivasan, B., Kumar, S. N., Banu, W. A., Malarvizhi, K., Priya, S. S., & Kumar, A. (2023). Learning impact of recent ICT advances based on virtual reality IoT sensors in a metaverse environment. Measurement: Sensors, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2023.100754
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/ 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brydges, C. R. (2019). Effect size guidelines, sample size calculations, and statistical power in gerontology. Innovation in Aging, 3(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz036
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for Education Challenges and Opportunities (1st ed.). National science teachers association.
Campos, E., Hidrogo, I., & Zavala, G. (2022). Impact of virtual reality use on the teaching and learning of vectors. Front, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.965640
Citra, N. F., & Anggaryani, M. (2022). One decade trends of virtual reality publication in Physics (2012-2021). Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(October), 1583–1597.
Cotton, K., & Ricker, T. J. (2022). Examining the relationship between working memory consolidation and long-term consolidation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 29(5), 1625–1648. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02084-2
Dale, V. H., Kline, K. L., Buford, M. A., Volk, T. A., Tattersall Smith, C., & Stupak, I. (2016). Incorporating bioenergy into sustainable landscape designs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 1158–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.038
Devianti, W., & Anggaryani, M. (2022). Virtual museum of tsunami project for increasing awareness of disaster risk potential in physics class. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 10(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i3.13380
Dossymov, Y., Ramankulov, S., Genc, N., Çoruh, A., Nurizinova, M., & Zhaksylyk, N. (2026). Integrating renewable energy based on science, technology, engineering and mathematics projects in promoting. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2026.02.06
Elvira, L., & May, M. (2019). Article Virtual laboratory simulation in the education of laboratory technicians —. Biochemistry and Molecura Biology Education, 47(3), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21221
Fathurohman, I., Amri, M. F., Septiyanto, A., & Riandi. (2023). Integrating STEM based education for sustainable development (ESD) to promote quality education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 1052–1059. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4430
Fauziah, S. S., Guntara, Y., & Septiyanto, R. F. (2024). Development of PHYVAR ( Physics in 3d Virtual Reality ) on Solar energy material to support students ’ spatial intelligence. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi (JPFT), 10(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v10i1.6647
Gamage, K. A. A., Ekanayake, S. Y., & Dehideniya, S. C. P. (2022). Embedding sustainability in learning and teaching: Lessons learned and moving forward-approaches in STEM higher education programmes. Education Sciences, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030225
Gebashe, K., Mthethwa, Q., Nzimande, M., Mlima, F., & Aroba, O. J. (2025). The integration of virtual reality chemistry laboratory: A case study durban university of technology. In A. Bajaj, A. Abraham, K. R. Madhavi, & D. Kriksciuniene (Eds.), Bio-Inspired Computing (pp. 479–492). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Güney, T. (2019). Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 26(5), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1595214
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hernández, M., Guevara, A. V., & Morales, R. (2019). Virtual reality laboratories : A review of experiences. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 13, 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00558-7
Hobbs, L., Clark, J. C., & Plant, B. (2018). Successful students – STEM program : Teacher learning through a multifaceted vision for STEM education. In Jorgensen, R., Larkin, K. (eds) STEM Education in the Junior Secondary. (pp. 133–168). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5448-8
Holmlund, T. D., Lesseig, K., & Slavit, D. (2018). Making sense of “ STEM education ” in K-12 contexts. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(32), 1–18. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s40594-018-0127-2
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. National Academia Press. https://doi.org/0.17226/18612
Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2017). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1515–1529. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0
Karimova, B., Zhumabekova, B., & Hamzina, S. (2025). The influence of virtual laboratories on students ’ interest in STEM fields : a longitudinal study in secondary education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 14(2), 1023–1033. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i2.30505
Kartikasari, A., & Anggaryani, M. (2022). Development of Virtual reality endogen energy (VREE) media for physics learning mechanical wave on class xi. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(3), 466. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5269
Kelley, P., & Whatson, T. (2013). Making long-term memories in minutes: A spaced learning pattern from memory research in education. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00589
Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Holland, J. D., & Han, J. (2020). Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(14), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w
Lai, Y., Chen, S., Lai, C., & Chang, Y. (2019). Study on enhancing AIoT computational thinking skills by plot image-based VR. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1580750
Liston, M. (2024). Powering our lives with secure, equitable and sustainable energy sources (SDG 7). In Teaching the Sustainable Development Goals to Young Citizens (10-16 Years): A Focus on Teaching Hope, Respect, Empathy and Advocacy in Schools (pp. 215–234). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003232001-13
Makransky, G., Borre‐Gude, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Motivational and cognitive benefits of training in immersive virtual reality based on multiple assessments. In Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (Vol. 35, Issue 6, pp. 691–707). Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12375
Mulugetta, Y., Ben Hagan, E., & Kammen, D. (2019). Energy access for sustainable development. Environmental Research Letters, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf449
Mulyatiningsih, E. (2012). Riset Terapan Bidang Pendidikan & Teknik. UNY Press.
Musyarrof, A. F., Nugroho, S. E., & Masturi. (2018). The Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Weakness in Senior High School on Physics Learning. 247(Iset), 38–41.
Newhouse, C. P. (2016). STEM the Boredom : engage students in the australian curriculum using ICT with problem-based learning and assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9650-4
Núñez, R. P., Augusto, C., Suarez, H., Aloiso, A., & Suárez, G. (2022). Using ICT in a hybrid environment for science education : A Postpandemic learning experience. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(3), 278–289.
Ong, Y. S., Koh, J., Tan, A.-L., & Ng, Y. S. (2023). Developing an integrated STEM classroom observation protocol using the productive disciplinary engagement framework. Research in Science Education, 54, 101–118. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11165-023-10110-z
Owusu, P. A., & Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. (2016). A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Engineering, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990
Permanasari, A., Rubini, B., Pursitasari, I. D., Nurramadhani, A., & Hadiana, D. (2024). Fun classroom: How seven graders and science teachers respond to stem learning as the first experience in suburban area? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v13i1.47386
Prillyanti, D. N. B., & Anggaryani, M. (2023). Development of virtual reality on material: Archimedes’ Law (VIRMA) to improve student learning outcomes. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi …, 10(3), 311–325.
Promboon, S., Finley, F. N., & Kaweekijmanee, K. (2018). The evolution and current status of stem education in Thailand : Policy Directions and Recommendations. In Fry, G. (eds) Education in Thailand. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects (42nd ed., pp. 423–459). Springer. https://doi.org10.1007/978-981-10-7857-6_17
Qolbi, G. N., Gunawan, B., & Sugandi, Y. S. (2023). Alternatif kebijakan untuk fly ash and bottom ash (Studi Kasus: Pp No. 22 Tahun 2021). SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF REFLECTION : Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 6(3), 502–512. https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v6i3.691
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). Computers & Education A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education : Design elements , lessons learned , and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147(December 2019), 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Rahmaniar, R., Junaidi, A., & Farta Wijaya, R. (2025). Renewable energy education through virtual reality tours. TEM Journal, 14(2), 1642–1649. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM142-61
Rasheed, G., Khan, M., & Malik, N. (2021). Measuring learnability through virtual reality laboratory application : A User Study. Sustainability, 13(19), 1–16.
Ritchie, H., & Rosado, P. (2017). Fossil fuels. Our World in Data.
Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8
Rogers, J., & Revesz, A. (2020). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. In The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (Issue July 2019, pp. 133–143). Routledge.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D) (19th ed.). Alfabeta.
Suhartini, H. (2023). Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fisika Murid kelas X-A SMAN 3 Pandeglang pada Materi Energi Terbarukan. 8(1), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.30653/003.202391.13
Sunaryo, & Susilo, A. (2017). Seepage zone identification at sutami dam by means of geoelectrical resistivity data seepage zone identification at sutami dam by means of geoelectrical resistivity data. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.
Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65(December 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565
Turner, A., Logan, M., & Wilks, J. (2022). Planting food sustainability thinking and practice through STEM in the garden. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), 1413–1439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09655-9
Wahyuni, S., Ilham, B., & Nureeyawaji. (2024). Evaluating stem-based reform teaching observation protocol to enhance students ’ communication skills in the context of sustainable development goals in science. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(3), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v13i3.9871
Wai Yie, L., Leong, Y. Z., & Leong, W. S. (2023). Virtual reality in education: Case studies and applications. IET Conference Proceedings, 2023(35), 186–187. https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2023.3332
Yavoruk, O. (2024). Virtual reality representations of timelines in physics classes. 5th International Conference on Education Development and Studies, 21–25.
Zakaria, A., & Anggaryani, M. (2024a). Development of virtual reality hydroelectric ( VIRRIC ) for teaching students about renewable energy. ORBITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Fisika, 10(2), 164–172.
Zakaria, A., & Anggaryani, M. (2024b). Pengembangan VR cardboard sebagai sarana media pembelajaran fisika berbasis realitas virtual. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 13(3), 242–247.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Digitalization in Physics Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 5
,
PDF Downloads: 2
, PDF Downloads: 1
