Integrating Computational Thinking into Natural and Social Science Learning in Elementary Education

Authors

  • Anna Roosyanti Wijaya Kusuma University of Surabaya
  • Diyas Age Larasati Wijaya Kusuma University of Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v12n1.p59-68

Keywords:

Computational Thinking, problem-solving skills, elementary education, natural and social science learning, unplugged activities

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) has been proposed as a way to strengthen problem solving in school curricula, yet evidence on its integration into integrated natural and social science learning in elementary education remains dispersed, and this study aims to examine how CT has been conceptualized and integrated, what evidence exists on its association with problem-solving skills, which implementation strategies have been reported, and which challenges and opportunities have been identified. A narrative literature review was conducted on 23 peer-reviewed articles from Scopus-indexed journals published between 2006 and 2024, covering conceptual papers, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and empirical studies. The results show that CT is commonly framed as a set of problem-solving practices embedded in science and mathematics contexts, that meta-analytic evidence reports moderate to large effects on CT and related cognitive outcomes with variation across educational levels, strategies, and measures, and that direct evidence on problem solving in elementary natural and social science learning remains limited, with social science represented in only 2 of 49 studies in one review. Unplugged, plugged, and combined strategies have been reported alongside recurring challenges in teacher readiness, assessment for young learners, and resources, which suggests that CT integration is a promising approach that requires further testing with explicit measures of problem solving.

References

Cabrera, L., Ketelhut, D. J., Mills, K., Killen, H., Coenraad, M., Byrne, V. L., & Plane, J. D. (2023). Designing a framework for teachers’ integration of computational thinking into elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21888

Chen, P., Yang, D., Metwally, A. H. S., Lavonen, J., & Wang, X. (2023). Fostering computational thinking through unplugged activities: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00434-7

Del Olmo-Muñoz, J., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero, J. A. (2020). Computational thinking through unplugged activities in early years of Primary Education. Computers & Education, 150, Article 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103832

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051

Hsu, T.-C., Chang, S.-C., & Hung, Y.-T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004

Huang, W., & Looi, C.-K. (2021). A critical review of literature on “unplugged” pedagogies in K-12 computer science and computational thinking education. Computer Science Education, 31(1), 83-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1789411

Li, Z., & Oon, P.-T. (2024). The transfer effect of computational thinking (CT)-STEM: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00498-z

Liu, Z., Gearty, Z., Richard, E., Orrill, C. H., Kayumova, S., & Balasubramanian, R. (2024). Bringing computational thinking into classrooms: A systematic review on supporting teachers in integrating computational thinking into K-12 classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00510-6

Merino-Armero, J. M., González-Calero, J. A., & Cózar-Gutiérrez, R. (2022a). Computational thinking in K-12 education: An insight through meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(3), 410-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1870250

Merino-Armero, J. M., González-Calero, J. A., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & del Olmo-Muñoz, J. (2022b). Unplugged activities in cross-curricular teaching: Effect on sixth graders’ computational thinking and learning outcomes. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(2), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6020013

Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L., & Bers, M. U. (2020). TechCheck: Development and validation of an unplugged assessment of computational thinking in early childhood education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(4), 482-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09831-x

Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047

Saxena, A., Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Wong, G. K. W. (2020). Designing unplugged and plugged activities to cultivate computational thinking: An exploratory study in early childhood education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00478-w

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Sánchez Viveros, B. (2019). The cognitive benefits of learning computer programming: A meta-analysis of transfer effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 764-792. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000314

Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 351-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9240-x

Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003

Tang, X., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 148, Article 103798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103798

Waterman, K. P., Goldsmith, L., & Pasquale, M. (2020). Integrating computational thinking into elementary science curriculum: An examination of activities that support students’ computational thinking in the service of disciplinary learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09801-y

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Ye, H., Liang, B., Ng, O.-L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in K-12 mathematics education: A systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w

Ye, J., Lai, X., & Wong, G. K.-W. (2022). The transfer effects of computational thinking: A systematic review with meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1620-1638. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12723

Yeni, S., Grgurina, N., Saeli, M., Hermans, F., Tolboom, J., & Barendsen, E. (2024). Interdisciplinary integration of computational thinking in K-12 education: A systematic review. Informatics in Education, 23(1), 223-278. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2024.08

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Anna Roosyanti, & Diyas Age Larasati. (2026). Integrating Computational Thinking into Natural and Social Science Learning in Elementary Education. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Hasil Penelitian, 12(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v12n1.p59-68
Abstract views: 416 , PDF Downloads: 348