Mapping High School Students' Metacognition Based On Mathematics Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jomp.v2n2.p68-81Keywords:
Metacognition, Problem Solving, Mathematics SkillsAbstract
Problem solving and metacognitive are two things that are interrelated. Problem solving is synonymous with cognitive processes whereas metacognition is synonymous with controlling and regulating cognitive processes. This study aims to describe the metacognition of students with different mathematical abilities. The subjects in this study consisted of one student with high, medium, and low math abilities. Data analysis was carried out based on metacognition indicators and problem solving. It was found that, there were differences in the three subjects in solving problems. The three subjects were able to fulfill the three components of metacognition, namely awareness, regulation, and evaluation. From this study, it is suggested to conduct a deeper assessment of the metacognition process of students with high, medium, and low math abilities to see their characteristics.
References
Al-Shabibi, Amal. 2018. Mathematical Problem-Solving and Metacognitive Skills of 5th Grade Students as a Function of Gender and Level of Academic Achievement. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences 13(2):385–95. doi: 10.18844/cjes.v13i2.3306.
Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing (A Revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives). New York: Addision Wesley Longman, Inc.
Baker, L. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading.In Douglas J. Hacker, John Dunlosky and Arthur C. Graesser (Eds.) Handbook of metacognition in education. (p. 7-25). New York: Routledge.
Biryukov, P. (2003). Metacognitive aspects of solving combinatorics problem Kaye College of Education. (Online), (www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk), accesed in Februari, 13th 2014.
Blazhenkova, O., and M. Kozhevnikov. (2008). The New Object-Spatial-Verbal Cognitive Style Model: Theory and Measurement. Wiley InterScience.
Bostic, J. D., Stephen J. P, and Tim Jacobbe. (2016). Encouraging Sixth-Grade Students’ Problem-Solving Performance by Teaching through Problem Solving. Investigations in Mathematics Learning 8(3):30–58. doi: 10.1080/24727466.2016.11790353.
Cai, Jinfa. 1994. A Protocol-Analytic Study of Metacognition in Mathematical Problem Solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 6(2):166–83. doi: 10.1007/BF03217270.
Charter, E. (2003). The Use of think-aloud methods in qualitatif research an intruduction to think-aloud methodes. Brook Education. (Online), Volume 12 Number 3 2003. p. 68-82, (www.brook.scholarsportal),accesed Agust, 22nd 2015.
Cromley, J.G. (2005). Metacognition, cognitive strategy instruction, and reading in adult literacy. (Online), (www.ncsall.net), accesed March, 1st 2014.
Damrongpanit, Suntonrapot. 2019. From Modern Teaching to Mathematics Achievement: The Mediating Role of Mathematics Attitude, Achievement Motivation, and Self-Efficacy. European Journal of Educational Research 8(3). doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.713.
Davidson, J. E. & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In D. J. Hacker., J. Dunlosky, A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 47-68).Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Desoete, A., Roeyers, H. & Buysse, A. (2001). Metacognition and mathematical problem solving in Grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities; Sep-Oct 2001; 34, 5; Academic Research Library.p 435. (Online), (www.fi.uu.nl), accesed September, 16th 2014.
Duffin, J.M. & Simpson, A.P. (2000). A Search for Understanding. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 18(4): 415-427.
Efklides, A. (2005). .Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell Us about the learning process? (Online), (www.researchgate.net), accesed January, 24th 2014.
Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. in L. Resnick (Ed), In the natrure of intelligence. (Online), (www.library.edu), accesed Juli, 12th 2014.
Guerra, Paula, & Woong, L. (2014). Latinas and Problem Solving: What They Say and What They Do. Problem Solving, 7(2):21.
Hastuti, I. D., Toto, N., & Hery, S. (2016). Constructive Metacognitive Activity Shift in Mathematical Problem Solving. 12.
In‟am, A., Sa‟ad, N.,& Ghani, S.A. (2012). A Metacognitive approach to solving Algebra problems. International Journal of Independent Research and Studies.University Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia. (Online), ISSN: 2226-4817; EISSN: 2304-6953 Vol. 1, Number 4, October2012, p162-173,(www.aiars.org/ijirs), accesed Mei, 4th 2014.
Jamil, Baizura, S., and Munirah, G. (2018). The Role of Executive Function and Visual-Spatial Working Memory in the Development of Mathematics Skill.” 7.
Karatas, I, & Baki, A. (2013). The Effect of Learning Environments Based on Problem Solving on Students’ Achievements of Problem Solving.” 19.
Kuzle, A. (2011). Patterns of metacognitive behaviour during mathematics problem solving in a dynamic geometry environment. (Online).Volume 8, Number 1, January 2013, (www.jwilson.coe.uga.edu), accesed September, 20th 2014.
Kuzle, A. (2019). Design and Evaluation of Practice-Oriented Materials Fostering Students’ Development of Problem-Solving Competence: The Case of Working Backward Strategy. 27.
Livingstone, J.L. (1997). Metacognition: An Overview. (Online), (www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas) , accesed June, 4th 2014.
Magiera, M. T. & Zawojewski, J. S. (2011). Characterizations of social-based and self-based contexts associated with students‟ awareness, evaluation, and regulation of their thinking during small-group mathematical modeling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Number 5, Volume 42 November 2011. p. 486-516.
Mokos, Evagelos, and Sonia Kafoussi. (2013). Elementary Students’ Spontaneous Metacognitive Functions in Different Types of Mathematical Problems. REDIMAT- Journal of Research in Mathematics Education (2):242–67. doi: 10.4471/redimat.2013.29.
Mukasyaf, F. K., Fauzi, M.A, and Mukhtar. (2019). Building Learning Trajectory Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in Circle Tangent Topic by Applying Metacognition Approach. International Education Studies 12(2):109. doi: 10.5539/ies.v12n2p109.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, ed. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Panaoura, A., Gagatsis, A. & Dimetriou, A. (2009). An Intervention to the metacognitive performance: Self-Regulation In mathemathics and mathematical modeling. Acta Didactica Universitatis Comenianae Mathematics, (Online), Issue 9, 2009, p. 63−79, (www.researchgate.net),accessed in June, 2nd 2014.
Polya, G. (1988). How to solve It, A New aspect of mathematical method. Oxford: Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford.
Praba, G. J. (2013). Metacognitive instruction and cooperative learning strategi for promoting insightful learning in science. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications.(Online), January 2013 Volume: 4 Issue: 1 Article: 15 ISSN1309-6249.January 2013, (www:ijonte.org), accessed in March, 30th 2014.
Purnomo, D. (2014a). Proses metakognisi kalkulus siswa dalam pemecahan masalah. Paper presented in Mathematic Education Natonal Seminar in Ronggolawe University. Tuban, May, 24th 2014.
Purnomo, D. (2014b). Profil metakognisi kalkulus siswa kelas 3 Sekolah Dasar pada pemecahan masalah bangun datar berdasar kerja kelompok. Paper presented in National Seminar of Educational in Kanjuruhan Malang University, June, 14th 2014.
Purnomo, D. (2014c). Proses metakognisi kalkulus siswa Sekolah Dasar pada pemecahan masalah dalam kelompok kecil. Paper presented in Mathematics Nastional Conference XII in Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS). Surabaya, June, 11th -13th 2014.
Purnomo, D. (2014d). Proses metakognisi pada kelompok kecil siswa kelas III Sekolah Dasar dalam memahami konsep bangun datar. Paper presented in Mathematic Education National inSanata Dharma University Jogjakarta, September, 13th2014.
Putri, R. Sarwindah, and Kurniati, D. (2015). Analisis Keterampilan Metakognitif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berbasis Polya Subpokok Bahasan Garis dan Sudut Kelas VII-C di SMP Negeri 1 Genteng Banyuwangi. Artikel Ilmiah Mahasiswa 1(2):7.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning To Think Mathematically : Problem Solving, Metacognition, And Sense Making In Mathematics. Pp. 334–70 in Handbook for Reseach on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York, NY: MacMilan.
Schraw, Gregory. (2009). A Conceptual Analysis of Five Measures of Metacognitive Monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1):33–45. doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3.
Schraw, Gregory, and Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive Theories. Educational Psychology Review 7(4):351–71. doi: 10.1007/BF02212307.
Sudia, M. (2015). Profil Metakognisi Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Open-Ended Ditinjau dari Tingkat Kemampuan Siswa. Math Educator Nusantara, 1(1):12.
Sujadi, I., Atmojo, T., and Muhtarom. (2012). Proses Berpikir Siswa Kelas Ix Sekolah Menengah Pertama Yang Berkemampuan Matematika Rendah Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Researgate.
Tan O. S., Parsons, R. D., Hinson, S. L.,& Sardo-Brown, D. (2003). Educational psychology a practitioner-researchera Approach. Australia: Thomson.
Tambunan, H. (2018). The Dominant Factor of Teacher’s Role as A Motivator of Students’ Interest and Motivation in Mathematics Achievement. International Education Studies, 11(4):144. doi: 10.5539/ies.v11n4p144.
Veenam, M.V.J., Wilhelm, P.,& Beishuize, J. J. (2004). The Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. (Online), (www.elsevier.com), accessed September, 14th2014.
Wellman, H. M. (1985). Origins of Metacognition.In D. L. F. -Pressley, G. E. McKinnon and T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition and human performance (Volume 1).Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.
Wilson, J. (2002). Monitoring Mathematical Metacognition. 29.
Wilson, J., and David C. (2002). Monitoring Mathematical Metacognition. 29.
Wilson, J, and David, C. (2004). Towards the Modelling of Mathematical Metacognition. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(2):25–48. doi: 10.1007/BF03217394
Abstract views: 91
,
PDF Downloads: 99
