STEM-EDP Research Trends in Science Education: A Systematic Review from 2016 - 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v15n1.p65-82Keywords:
Research Trends , STEM-EDP , Science Education , Systematic Review , Vos ViewerAbstract
Objective: This study aims to analyze the research trends, characteristics, and development patterns of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics integrated with the Engineering Design Process (STEM-EDP) in Science Education from 2016 to 2025. Method: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) combined with bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer. A total of 101 articles indexed in the Springer database were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The analysis focused on annual publication trends, keyword frequency, research methods, authorship patterns, geographical distribution, citation rankings, and journal productivity. Results: The findings indicate a consistent upward trend in STEM-EDP publications, with a projected peak in 2025. Qualitative research methods dominate the field (80.19%), reflecting the exploratory nature of STEM-EDP studies. Single-authored publications are most common, while the Americas—particularly the United States—contribute the highest number of publications. The most cited authors are Kelly C. Margot and Todd Kettler (179 citations). The International Journal of Technology and Design Education is identified as the most productive journal. Keyword mapping reveals that STEM-EDP remains in an emerging research cluster, frequently associated with project-based learning and creative thinking. Novelty: This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric mapping specifically focused on STEM-EDP within Science Education using the Springer database for the 2016–2025 period. Unlike previous reviews that examined general STEM research, this study highlights the distinct integration of the Engineering Design Process and identifies emerging thematic directions and methodological gaps for future research.
Downloads
References
Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
Archila, P. A., Restrepo, S., Truscott de Mejía, A. M., & Molina, J. (2023). STEM and Non-STEM Misconceptions About Evolution: Findings from 5 Years of Data. Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00428-5
Arık, M., & Topçu, M. S. (2022). Implementation of engineering design process in the K-12 science classrooms: Trends and issues. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09912-x
Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2022). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Science Education, 106(2), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257
Capobianco, B. M., & Radloff, J. (2022). Elementary preservice teachers’ trajectories for appropriating engineering design–based science teaching. Research in Science Education, 52(5), 1623–1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10020-y
Chiang, F. K., Chang, C. H., Wang, S., Cai, R. H., & Li, L. (2022). The effect of an interdisciplinary STEM course on children’s attitudes of learning and engineering design skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09603-z
Crismond, D., & Adams, R. (2021). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 33–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x
Cunningham, C. M., & Carlsen, W. S. (2020). Teaching engineering practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9380-5
Deniz, H., Kaya, E., Yesilyurt, E., & Trabia, M. (2020). The influence of an engineering design experience on elementary teachers’ nature of engineering views. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(4), 635–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09518-4
Ehsan, H., Rehmat, A. P., & Cardella, M. E. (2021). Computational thinking embedded in engineering design: capturing computational thinking of children in an informal engineering design activity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09562-5
Falloon, G., Hatzigianni, M., Bower, M., Forbes, A., & Stevenson, M. (2020). Understanding K-12 STEM Education: A framework for developing STEM Literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology 29(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09823-x
Fan, S. C., Yu, K. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2021). A Framework for implementing an engineering-focused STEM curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(8), 1523–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10129-y
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Harwell, M. (2020). Building up STEM: An analysis of teacher-developed engineering design-based STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 120(3), 135–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1129
Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2019). Development of an engineering design process-based teaching and learning model for scientifically gifted students at the Science Education Institute for the Gifted in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0047-6
Han, J., Park, D., Hua, M., & Childs, P. R. N. (2022). Is group work beneficial for producing creative designs in STEM design education? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(5), 2801–2826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09709-y
Hsu, M. C., Chiang, C., & Liang, C. (2014). The mediator effects of imagination between learning environment and academic performance: a comparison between science and engineering majors. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9262-3
Hughes, B. S., Corrigan, M. W., Grove, D., Andersen, S. B., & Wong, J. T. (2022). Integrating arts with STEM and leading with STEAM to increase science learning with equity for emerging bilingual learners in the United States. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00375-7
Hyun, J. S., & Park, C. J. (2020). Research Analysis on STEAM Education with digital technology in Korea to prepare for post-corona era education. International Journal of Contents, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2020.16.3.101
Irwanto, I. (2021). Research trends in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic literature review from 2010 to 2021. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 2045–2054. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.4.2045
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2021). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Leung, A. (2020). Boundary crossing pedagogy in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00212-9
Liao, C. (2020). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEM education. Art Education, 73(3), 44–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873
Lin, H. (2016). Influence of design training and spatial solution strategies on spatial ability performance. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9302-7
Mafugu, T., Tsakeni, M., & Jita, L. C. (2022). Preservice Primary Teachers’ Perceptions of STEM-Based Teaching in Natural Sciences and Technology Classrooms. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(4), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00252-z
Marín-Marín, J. A., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Dúo-Terrón, P., & López-Belmonte, J. (2021). STEAM in education: a bibliometric analysis of performance and co-words in Web of Science. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00296-x
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
McFadden, J., & Roehrig, G. (2019). Engineering design in the elementary science classroom: supporting student discourse during an engineering design challenge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 231–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9444-5
Park, W., Wu, J. Y., & Erduran, S. (2020). The Nature of STEM disciplines in the science education standards documents from the USA, Korea and Taiwan: Focusing on disciplinary aims, values and practices. Science and Education, 29(4), 899–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00139-1
Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
Pleasants, J., & Olson, J. (2021). What is engineering? Elaborating the nature of engineering for K–12 education. Science Education, 105(5), 906–932. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21655
Purzer, Ş., Goldstein, M. H., Adams, R. S., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2015). An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(3), 633–658. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0019-7
Rustan, N. A., Winarni, R., & Yamtinah, S. (2020). Analysis of science process skill on science learning in primary school. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019). https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icliqe-19/125933450
So, K., & Park, N. (2022). Can teachers be change agents? A critical analysis of teacher Images in school reform policies. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00536-8
Thahir, A., Anwar, C., Saregar, A., Choiriah, L., Susanti, F., & Pricilia, A. (2020). The effectiveness of STEM learning: Scientific attitudes and students’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012008
Turner, K. L., Kirby, M., & Bober, S. (2016). Engineering design for engineering design: Benefits, models, and examples from practice. Inquiry in Education, 8(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1171674
Van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
Wendell, K. B., Wright, C. G., & Paugh, P. (2017). Reflective practices in elementary engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(2), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20173
Wilson, S. M. (2021). Realizing STEM’s potential and promise. Journal for STEM Education Research, 4(2), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-021-00056-0
Wind, S. A., Alemdar, M., Lingle, J. A., Moore, R., & Asilkalkan, A. (2019). Exploring student understanding of the engineering design process using distractor analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0156-x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 63
,
PDF Downloads: 0
