PENGEMBANGAN LEMBAR KERJA SISWA MODEL INKUIRI TERBIMBING MATERI ELEKTROKIMIA KELAS XII SMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v7n1.p1447-1454Keywords:
worksheet, guided inquiry, electrochemistryAbstract
This research aimed to develop valid, practical, and effective worksheet to support electrochemistry learning using guided inquiry model. Development of worksheet based on ADDIE model (Analyse, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate). Worksheet were implemented at grade XII chemistry students using one group pretest-posttest design. Validity of worksheet was measured from relevance and consistency based on expert judgment with minimum score of 2,6. Practicality of worksheet was measured from students activity with minimun percentage of 60%. Effectivenes of worksheet was measured from its impact to increase students cognitive achievement significanly. Validity and practicality was analyzed using descriptive statistics, whereas effectiveness of cognitive achievement was analyzed using inferential t-test. The result of data analysis were: (1) content validiy and construct validity of worksheet developed was very valid; (2) students activity were very good; (3) cognitive achievement has increased significanly both in pilot implementation and final implementationDownloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing : A Revision of Blooms Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman: New York .
Ahtee, M., Asunta. T., & Palm, H. (2002) Student Teachers Problems In Teaching ˜Electrolysiswith A Key Demonstration. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe. 3(3), 317-326.
Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B., & Lundberg, B. K. S. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education. 25(3), 112-121.
Bilgin, I. (2009). The effects of guided inquiry instruction incorporating a cooperative learning approach on university students achievement of acid and bases concepts and attitude toward guided inquiry instruction. Academic Journals of Scientific Researh and Essay. 4(10),1038-1046.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: ADDIE approach. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori-teori belajar & pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Garnett, P.J. & Treagust, D. F. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: Electric circuits and oxidation-reduction equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 121142.
Haryani, Sri. (2014). Identifikasi Materi Kimia SMA Sulit Menurut Pandangan Guru dan Calon Guru Kimia. Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia VI, œPemantapan Riset Kimia dan Asesmen dalam pembelajaran berbasiss Pendekatan Saintifik, Surakarta.
Kemp, J.E., G.R. Morrison, & S.M. Ross. (1994). Designing Effective Instruction. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.
Kuhlthau, C.C. & Todd, R. J. (2008). Guided inquiry: A framework for learning through school libraries in 21st century schools. Newark NJ: Rutgers University.
Lim, D. H., & Johnson, S. (2002). Trainee Perceptions of factors that influence learning transfer. International Journal of Training and Development, 6 (1), 3648.
McDonnel. (2013). The Effects of Guided Inquiry on Understanding High School Chemistry. Montana State University.
Millar, R., Osborne, J., & Nott, M. (1998). Science Education fot the Future. [Report Descriptive]. School Science Review, 80 (291), 19-24
Miri, B., David, B.C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353-369.
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. Netherlands: Springer.
Nugraha, M.G., & Aviyanti, L. (2014, Juni). Profil Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa International Program on Science Education (IPSE) dalam Matakuliah œScience in Daily Life Melalui Implementasi Pembelajaran Aktif Berbasis Inkuiri. Seminar Nasional Inovasi Pendidikan, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Ogude, A.N., & Bradley, J.D. (1996). Electrode processes and aspects relating to cell emf, current, and cell components in operating electrochemical cells. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(12), 1145-1149.
Ong, A & Borich. (2006). Teaching Strategies that Promote Thinking: Models and Curriculum Approaches (First Edition). London: McGraw-Hill Education.
Ozkaya, R.A., Uce, M., & Sahin, M. (2003). Prospective teachers conceptual understanding of electrochemistry. The Royal Society of Chemistry. 7(1), 1-8.
Poulson, T. (2010). Introduction to Chemistry. New York: Amazon Company
Risa, H. (2015). Miskonsepsi pada Materi Elektrokimia Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Ilmiah Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia. 4(3), 79-84.
Ratumanan, G. T., & Laurens.(2011). Evaluasi hasil belajar pada tingkat satuan pendidikan. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya Press.
Riduwan.(2010). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Schmidt, H.J., A. Marohn & A.G. Harisson, 2007. Factors that prevent learning in electrochemistry. Journal of Science and Educational Technology. 44, 258-283. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20118.
Shidiq, A. S., Masykuri, M., & Susanti, E. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian two-tier multiple-choice untuk mengukur keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi (higher order thinking skills) pada materi kelarutan dan hasil kali kelarutan untuk siswa SMA/MA Kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia. 3(4), 83-92.
Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided inquiry experiments on science education students chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety, and achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4),217-227.
Ahtee, M., Asunta. T., & Palm, H. (2002) Student Teachers Problems In Teaching ˜Electrolysiswith A Key Demonstration. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe. 3(3), 317-326.
Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B., & Lundberg, B. K. S. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education. 25(3), 112-121.
Bilgin, I. (2009). The effects of guided inquiry instruction incorporating a cooperative learning approach on university students achievement of acid and bases concepts and attitude toward guided inquiry instruction. Academic Journals of Scientific Researh and Essay. 4(10),1038-1046.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: ADDIE approach. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori-teori belajar & pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Garnett, P.J. & Treagust, D. F. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: Electric circuits and oxidation-reduction equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 121142.
Haryani, Sri. (2014). Identifikasi Materi Kimia SMA Sulit Menurut Pandangan Guru dan Calon Guru Kimia. Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia VI, œPemantapan Riset Kimia dan Asesmen dalam pembelajaran berbasiss Pendekatan Saintifik, Surakarta.
Kemp, J.E., G.R. Morrison, & S.M. Ross. (1994). Designing Effective Instruction. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.
Kuhlthau, C.C. & Todd, R. J. (2008). Guided inquiry: A framework for learning through school libraries in 21st century schools. Newark NJ: Rutgers University.
Lim, D. H., & Johnson, S. (2002). Trainee Perceptions of factors that influence learning transfer. International Journal of Training and Development, 6 (1), 3648.
McDonnel. (2013). The Effects of Guided Inquiry on Understanding High School Chemistry. Montana State University.
Millar, R., Osborne, J., & Nott, M. (1998). Science Education fot the Future. [Report Descriptive]. School Science Review, 80 (291), 19-24
Miri, B., David, B.C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353-369.
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. Netherlands: Springer.
Nugraha, M.G., & Aviyanti, L. (2014, Juni). Profil Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa International Program on Science Education (IPSE) dalam Matakuliah œScience in Daily Life Melalui Implementasi Pembelajaran Aktif Berbasis Inkuiri. Seminar Nasional Inovasi Pendidikan, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Ogude, A.N., & Bradley, J.D. (1996). Electrode processes and aspects relating to cell emf, current, and cell components in operating electrochemical cells. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(12), 1145-1149.
Ong, A & Borich. (2006). Teaching Strategies that Promote Thinking: Models and Curriculum Approaches (First Edition). London: McGraw-Hill Education.
Ozkaya, R.A., Uce, M., & Sahin, M. (2003). Prospective teachers conceptual understanding of electrochemistry. The Royal Society of Chemistry. 7(1), 1-8.
Poulson, T. (2010). Introduction to Chemistry. New York: Amazon Company
Risa, H. (2015). Miskonsepsi pada Materi Elektrokimia Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Ilmiah Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia. 4(3), 79-84.
Ratumanan, G. T., & Laurens.(2011). Evaluasi hasil belajar pada tingkat satuan pendidikan. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya Press.
Riduwan.(2010). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Schmidt, H.J., A. Marohn & A.G. Harisson, 2007. Factors that prevent learning in electrochemistry. Journal of Science and Educational Technology. 44, 258-283. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20118.
Shidiq, A. S., Masykuri, M., & Susanti, E. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian two-tier multiple-choice untuk mengukur keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi (higher order thinking skills) pada materi kelarutan dan hasil kali kelarutan untuk siswa SMA/MA Kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia. 3(4), 83-92.
Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided inquiry experiments on science education students chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety, and achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4),217-227.
Downloads
Published
2017-11-10
How to Cite
Tuqa, E. T. N. U., Suyono, S., & Sugiarto, B. (2017). PENGEMBANGAN LEMBAR KERJA SISWA MODEL INKUIRI TERBIMBING MATERI ELEKTROKIMIA KELAS XII SMA. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 7(1), 1447–1454. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v7n1.p1447-1454
Issue
Section
Articles
Abstract views: 840
,
PDF Downloads: 982
