PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN IPA DENGAN STRATEGI PREDICT-DISCUS-EXPLAIN-OBSERVE-DISCUS-EXPLAIN (PDEODE) UNTUK MEMINIMALISASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMP

Authors

  • Megawati Megawati Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Muslimin Ibrahim
  • Tjipto Haryono

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v7n1.p1422-1430

Keywords:

Development Learning Material, PDEODE, Minimize of Misconceptions, Certainty of Response Index (CRI)

Abstract

This research had aimed to develop a Natural Science Learning Material with PDEODE strategy to minimize misconceptions of Junior High School students on material structure and function  of plant tissue. The learning instrument is developed by using 4-D model with a try out-design namely one group pre-test - post-test design. The lesson plan has been tried out to 25 students of VIII-B class SMP Raden Rahmat Surabaya in the odd semester of  2016/2017 academic year. The data collection apply data validation, observation, achievement test, and questionnaire. The research data were analysed descriptively both qualitative and quantitative. The research findings were as follows: (1) The validity of the learning instrument which comprises Lesson Plan, Student Book, Student Worksheet, and a valid Identify Misconceptions Instrument; (2) The practicality of the learning instrument that can be found from: (a) the implementation of the lesson plans that is categorized as ˜good, (b) the students activities and (3) The effectiveness of the learning instrument that was reviewed through: (a) the decrease misconception student from pretest to postest;; and (b) the response of students . Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that the Natural Science Learning Instrument based Predict-Discuss-Explain Observe-Discuss-Explain (PDEODE) strategy was feasible to minimize of misconceptions students Junior High School.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Awi, M.Darwis, Sukarna. (2009). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivistik dalam Matematika yang Melibatkan Scaffolding Metakognitif. Laporan Penelitian Hibah Bersaing. Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Borich, G. D. (1994). Observation Skills for Effective Teaching. New York: McMillan Publishing Company.
Costu, B. (2008). œLearning Science Trough the PDEODE Teaching Strategy: Helping Students Make Of Everyday Situations. Eurasia Journal of Mathemtahics, Science and Technology Education. 4(1): 3-9.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2003). Undang-Undang RI tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Gustiani, I. (2013). Perubahan Koseptual dan Akusisi Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa pada Konsep Pemisahan Campuran melalui Metode Predict Discuss Explain Observe Discuss Explain (PDEODE). Skripsi. Bandung: Jurusan IPA FMIPA UPI.
Hakim, A, Liliasari, dan Kadarohman. (2009). Student Concept understanding of Natural Product Chemistry in Primary and Secondary Metabolist Using the Data Collecting technique of Modified CRI. International Journal of Educattional Science, Volume 4, Nomor 3, Hal: 544-553
Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., and Kelly, E. L. (1999). œMisconception and The Certainty of Response Index. Journal of Physics Education. Vol. 34, No. 5.
Ibrahim, M. (2012). Seri Pembelajaran Inovatif Konsep, Miskonsepsi, dan Cara Pembelajarannya. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Ibrahim, M., dan Wahyusukartiningsih. (2014). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif melalui Pemaknaan. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Kearney, Matthew. (2001). Student and Teacher Perceptions of the Use of Multimedia Supported Predict-Discuss-Explain Tasks to Probe Undestanding. Journal. p. 589-615.
Niaz, Mansoor. (2012). Investigating The Effectiveness of a POE-Based Teaching Activity on Student Understanding of Condensation. Journal. p. 47-67.
Riduwan. 2012. Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ross, Keith. (2003). Alternative Framework and Misconsecption in Primary Science. Gordon Guest, UWE, Bristol.
Saidah G & Suyono. (2012). Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran PDEODE (Predict, Discuss, Explain, Observe, Discuss, Explain) untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Pokok Hidrolisis Garam di SMA Negeri 2 Bojonegoro. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia Unesa 2012. Jurusan Kimia FMIPA UNESA.
Sekartini. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Predict Discuss Explain Observe Discuss Explain (PDEODE) terhadap Pemahaman Konsep IPA Siswa Kelas IV SD Gugus XII Kecamatan Buleleng. http://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPGSD/article/viewFile/682/556. Diakses tanggal 23 Maret 2016
Solichah I, Tukiran & Hasan S. (2014). Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran PDEODE untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi Siswa. Jurnal Pendididkan Sains e-Pensa 2 (2): 308-316.
Suparno, P. (2005). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta : PT Grasindo.
Suyati & Pukan. (2015). Pengembangan Lembar Kgiatan Siswa Berbasis PDEODE pada Materi Sistem Pencernaan Manusia. Unnes Journal of Biology Education 4 (1): 45-52.
Thiagaradjan, S. D. S, Semmel & M. I, Semmel. (1974). Instructional Development for Teacher Center of Expectional Children. Minepolish: Indiana University.
Trianto. (2009). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group

Downloads

Published

2017-11-10

How to Cite

Megawati, M., Ibrahim, M., & Haryono, T. (2017). PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN IPA DENGAN STRATEGI PREDICT-DISCUS-EXPLAIN-OBSERVE-DISCUS-EXPLAIN (PDEODE) UNTUK MEMINIMALISASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMP. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 7(1), 1422–1430. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v7n1.p1422-1430

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 1350 , PDF Downloads: 1301