Profile of Toulmin’s Scientific Arguments Students and Technological Utilities in Global Warming Topic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v12n1.p85-99Keywords:
Global Warming, Scientific Arguments, Technological Utilities, Toulmin’s Argument PatternAbstract
Research aims to determine the profile of Toulmin’s Scientific Argument on students' and Technological Utilities In Global Warning Topic. This research is a quantitative descriptive study using the observation method. Data is collected through observation, validation, tests, and questionnaires for student responses. The analysis of students' argumentation skills was carried out by observing the learning process and giving a written test conducted in students of senior high school. According to Toulmin, the assessment of students' argumentation skills refers to the measurement of argumentation skills, which includes components of claim, data, warrant, rebuttal, and backing. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the Toulmin’s Scientific Arguments students and Technological Utilities are still relatively low, Toulmin Scientific Arguments students skills are at level 2, dominated by the most claims originating from scientific data/concepts and experience as well as personal observations of the environment and the use of technology in learning is still not optimal to improve Toulmin’s Scientific Arguments Students. Hence, it is necessary to provide innovative learning that can optimally improve Toulmin’s Scientific Arguments.
Downloads
References
Abduh, N. K., Sastromiharjo, A., & Anshori, D. S. (2019). Pola argumentasi pada genre teks eksposisi karangan siswa SMA. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v12i1.7372
Adami, F. Z. & Budihartanti, C. (2016). Penerapan teknologi augmented reality pada media pembelajaran sistem pencernaan berbasis android. Jurnal Teknik Komputer AMIK BSI, 2(1), 122–131.
Admoko, S., Hanifah, N., Suprapto, N., Hariyono, E., & Madlazim, M. (2021). The implementation of Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model to improve scientific argumentation skills of high school students Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747, 1-7. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012046
Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri, D. (2017). Project-based learning and problem-based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11100
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
Faiqoh, N., Khasanah, N., Astuti, L. P., Prayitno, R., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Profil keterampilan argumentasi siswa kelas X dan XI MIPA di SMA batik 1 surakarta pada materi keanekaragaman hayati. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(3), 174-182. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v7i3.10122
Fitri, A. (2020). Problem based learning berbasis scientific approach terhadap kemampuan bepikir kreatif siswa pada pembelajaran fisika. Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan Fisika FITK UNSIQ, 2(1), 1–6.
Handayani, P., Murtiati, M., & Sardianto, S. (2015). Analisis argumentasi peserta didik kelas X SMA muhammadiyah 1 palembang dengan menggunakan model argumentasi toulmin. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(1), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v2i1.2355
Herlanti, Y. (2014). Analisis argumentasi mahasiswa pendidikan biologi pada isu sosiosainfik konsumsi genetically modified organism (GMO). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i1.2901
Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473.
Istiana, R., Herawati, D., & Ardianto, D. (2020). Argumentation real-world inquiry to improve students’ argumentation skill. Jurnal Bioedukatika, 8(2), 131–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v8i2.12705
Jannah, N., Farlina, A., & Sari, N. (2020). Religiusitas siswa dan sikap siswa pada mata pelajaran fisika. SPEKTRA: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains, 6(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.32699/spektra.v6i1.125
Jewaru, A. A. L., Parno, P., & Nasikhudin, N. (2021). Identifikasi kualitas argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMA pada termodinamika. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian dan Pengembangan, 6(9), 1436 – 1446. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i9.15008
Jou, M., Lin, Y. T., & Wu, D. W. (2016). Effect of a blended learning environment on student critical thinking and knowledge transformation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1131–1147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.961485
Liu, S., & Roehrig, G. (2019). Exploring science teachers’ argumentation and personal epistemology about global climate change. Research in Science Education, 49(7), 173–189. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9617-3
Martyn, J., Terwijn, R., Kek, M. Y. C. A., & Huijser, H. (2014). Exploring the relationships between teaching, approaches to learning and critical thinking in a problem-based learning foundation nursing course. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 829–835. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.023
Osborne, J. (2017). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse Science. Science, 328(5977), 463-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
Putri, A., Roza, Y., & Maimunah, M. (2020). Development of learning tools with the discovery learning model to improve the critical thinking ability of mathematics. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 83–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jes.4.1.p.83-92
Riwayani, R., Perdana, R., Sari, R., Jumadi, J., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi optik: problem based learning berbantuan edu-media simulation. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 45-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22548
Setiawati, I., & Nurlaelah, I. (2017). Analisis profil kemampuan berargumentasi guru dan mahasiswa calon guru dalam pembelajaran biologi menggunakan model toulmin’s argumen pattern (TAP) dan upaya perbaikannya. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Biologi, 9(1), 7–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/biosfer.v10i2.5663
Setiono, S. (2017). Optimalisasi penguasaan konsep, kemampuan berinkuiri dan sikap ilmiah mahasiswa melalui modul berbasis inkuiri. BIOSFER : Jurnal Biologi Dan Pendidikan Biologi, 1(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.23969/biosfer.v1i1.266
Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suliyanah, S., Fadillah, R. N., Deta, U. A. (2020) The process of developing students’ scientific argumentation skill using argument-driven inquiry (ADI) model in senior high school on the topic of elasticity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012046
Sumardani, D., Putri, A. Saraswati, R. R., & Muliyati, D., & Bakri, F. (2020). Virtual reality media: The simulation of relativity theory on smartphone. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 10(1), 13–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v10i1.5063
Syarifudin, A. S. (2020). Impelementasi pembelajaran daring untuk meningkatkan mutupendidikan sebagai dampak diterapkannya social distancing. Jurnal Pendidkan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.21107/metalingua.v5i1.7072
Wardani, A. D., Yuliati, L., & Taufiq, A. (2018). Kualitas argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi hukum newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(10), 1364–1372. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i10.11734
Yerimadesi, Y., Bayharti, B., Azizah, A., Lufri, L., Andromeda, A., & Guspatni, G. (2019). Effectiveness of acid-base modules based on guided discovery learning for increasing critical thinking skills and learning outcomes of senior high school student. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012151
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 146
,
PDF Downloads: 122
