FLIPPED CLASSROOM TO FIND AND STUDY JOURNALS AS WELL AS IMPROVING SCIENTIFIC LITERACY IN MIDDLE STUDENTS

Yohana Saraswati; Sifak Indana; Elok Sudibyo

doi:10.26740/jpps.v10n2.p1960-1967

Authors

Yohana Saraswati Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Sifak Indana Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Elok Sudibyo Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v10n2.p1960-1967

Keywords:

flipped classroom, scientific literacy

Abstract

The foundation of attitudes, knowledge, and skills for students is the foundation of scientific literacy. The benefit of the flipped classroom model is that students can learn outside the classroom so that learning in the classroom is effective with literary discussions. Students were given the task of watching videos about how to find and study journals about student digestion health. In the classroom, students work in groups to practice their knowledge and skills based on the videos they have learned. Furthermore, students were given a survey on the effectiveness of the video to deepen their knowledge and skills. One hundred and twenty students completed the survey and the results showed that the students found the video very helpful in searching and studying journals. The result was that students tÃ©rbanti in 86% searched and 77% studied journals. Students claim that learning outside the classroom through video helps them with assignments (90%), the information obtained can be applied at other levels (87%) and they prefer to learn via video outside of the classroom to learn in class (63%). Students can acquire scientific literacy knowledge and skills through the flipped classroom methodology, especially watching videos.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abeysekera, L & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14.

Bishop, J & Verleger, M. (2013). Testing the flipped classroom with model-eliciting activities and video lectures in a mid-level undergraduate engineering course. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 161–163.

Bishop, J & Verlenger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In 120th American Society of Engineering Education National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia June, 30(9), 23–26.

Butt, A. (2014). Classroom approach: Evidence from. Business Education, 6(1), 33–44.

Chen, H.L & Summers, K.LS. (2015). Developing, using, and interacting in the flipped learning movement: Gaps among subject areas. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(3), 41–64.

Delialioǧlu, Ö. (2012). Student engagement in blended learning environments with lecture-based and problem-based instructional approaches. Educational Technology and Society, 15(3), 310–322.

Figurska, I & Sokół, A. (2016). The process of knowledge acquisition with the use of various teaching methods and its effect on the creativity of employees of the creative sector. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(6), 143-153.

Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12–17.

Freeman, C., & Herreid, N.A.S. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.

Holbrook, J. (2014). A context-based approach to science teaching. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(2), 152–154.

Nouri, J. (2016). The flipped classroom: for active, effective and increased learning – especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 33-40.

Kellinger, J.J. (2012). The flipside: Concerns about the “New literacies” paths educators might take. The Educational Forum, 76(4), 524–536.

Archer-Bradshaw, R. (2014). Demystifying scientific literacy: Charting the path for the 21st century. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(3), 165–172.

Park, T., Pearson, D., & Richardson, G.B. (2017). Curriculum integration: Helping career and technical education students truly develop college and career readiness. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(2), 192–208.

Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17(1), 74-84.

Smith, K.V., Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Dimitrakopoulos, C. (2012). Developing scientific literacy in a primary school. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 127–152.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Materi pendukung gerakan literasi nasional. Jakarta.

Stark, E., Kintz, S., Pestorious, C., & Teriba, A. (2018). Assessment for learning: Using programmatic assessment requirements as an opportunity to develop information literacy and data skills in undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1061–1068.

Martin, M. (2015). Review of flipped learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1–22.

Yocoubian, H.A. (2018). Scientific literacy for democratic decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 308–327.