Peer Review Process

This journal follows a double-blind peer review process. To ensure complete impartiality, the identities of both the authors and the reviewers are kept strictly anonymous throughout the entire evaluation.

1. Initial Editorial Assessment

Upon submission, your manuscript will be initially evaluated by our editorial board to ensure it aligns with the journal's aims and scope, meets formatting criteria, and adheres to ethical publishing standards.

2. Double-Blind Peer Review

If the submission is deemed suitable for the journal, it will be assigned to a handling editor and sent to a minimum of two expert reviewers for rigorous evaluation of its scientific quality.

>Author Anonymity: Reviewers will not have access to the authors' names, institutions, or biographical data.
>Reviewer Anonymity: Authors will not know the identities of the experts evaluating their work.

3. Final Editorial Decision

The final decision to accept, reject, or request revisions (minor or major) for your article rests entirely with the handling and chief editors, heavily guided by the reviewers' expert recommendations.