PENGARUH PERMINTAAN TERHADAP OUTCOME SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS DI KOTA SURABAYA

Main Article Content

Ady Soejoto
Lucky Rachmawati
Retno Mustika Dewi

Abstract

This research aim to determine the effect of demand on high school outcomes. The results showed the economic, demographic, educational and social environment have a significant effect on the academics ability. Partially no positive influence of economic factors and academic ability but the effect is not significant, a significant positive influence factor is education of parents. The higher the parents 'education level the higher the students' academic abilities. further more significant negative influence of demographic, social environment while having no effect on students' academic abilities. Another finding no direct effect on the economic demographics, but no effect indirectly on academic ability

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Soejoto, A., Rachmawati, L., & Dewi, R. M. (2017). PENGARUH PERMINTAAN TERHADAP OUTCOME SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS DI KOTA SURABAYA. JURNAL EKONOMI PENDIDIKAN DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN, 2(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.26740/jepk.v2n1.p17-28
Section
Articles

References

Adeyemi, T.O. 2008.The Influence of Class-Size on the Quality of Output in
Secondary Schools in Ekiti State, Nigeria. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research 3 (1): 7-14.

Akin, J and M Lea. 1982. Microdata estimation of school expenditure levels: An alternative to the median voter approach. Public Choice 38: 113-128.

Akin, J and D. Youngday. 1976. The efficiency of local school finance. Review of Economics and Statistics. 58: 255-58.

Bergstrom, T, D Rubinfeld; P Shapiro. 1982. Micro-based estimates of demand functions for local public education. Journal of Public Economics 35: 289-307.

Bordens, Kenneth S. and Abbott, Bruce B. 2011. Research Design and Methods : A Process Approach. New York : McGraw Hill.

Buchmann, Claudia; Hannum, Emil. 2001. Education and Stratification in Developing Countries: A Review of Theories and Research. Annual Review of Sociology Vol. 27: 77-102

Buckingham, J. 1999. The puzzle of boys. educational decline: a review of the evidence. Issue Analysis, No.9, Centre for Independent Studies, Sydney.

Buckingham, J. 2000. Boy Troubles: Understanding Rising Suicide, Rising Crime and Educational Failure, CIS Policy Monograph 46, Centre for Independent Studies, Sydney.

Cheng, Yin Cheong; Ng, Kwok Hung; Magdalena Mo Ching Mok. 2002. Economic considerations in education policy making: A simplified framework. The International Journal of Educational Management : 16, 1;
Page 18.

Corak, Miles; Lipps, Garth and Zhao, John. 2004. Family Income and Participation in Post Secondary Education. Statistics Canada Analytical Research. Paper Series No. 210.

Corcoran, Mary, Roger Gordon, Deborah Laren, and Gary Solon. 1990. œEffects of Family and Community Background on Economic-Status. American Economic Review 80(2): 36266.

Crane, Jonathan. 1991. œEffects of Neighborhood on Dropping Out of School and Teenage Childbearing. In The Urban Underclass, edited by Christopher
Jencks and Paul E. Peterson (299-320). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings
Institution.

Datcher-Loury, Linda. 1999. Family Background and School Achievement Among Low Income Blacks. The Journal of Human Resources : XXIV 3.

Ebert, Edward S. and Culyer, Richard C. 2011. School: An Introduction to
Education. Belmont : Wadsworth.

Fasih, Tazeen. 2008. Linking Education Policy to Labor Market Outcomes.
Washington DC : The World Bank.

Fraenkel, Jack; Wallen, Norman and Hyun, Helen. 2012. How To Design and
Evaluate Research in Education. New York : McGraw-Hill.

Ghozali, Imam dan Fuad. 2005. Structural Equation Modeling : Teori, Konsep, & Aplikasi Dengan Program Lisrel 8.54. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Lankford, R. H. 1985. Preferences of citizens for public expenditures on elementary and secondary education. Journal of Econometrics 27: 1-20.

Lankford, R. H. 1986. Efficiency and equity in the provision of public education. Review of Economics and Statistics 67: 70-80.

Miller, Cynthia. 1996. Demographics and spending for public education: a test of interest group influence. Economics of Education Review. 15, 2: 175-185.

National Board of Education. 1999. A Framework for Evaluating Educational
Outcomes in Finland. Helsinki.

Olubadewo S.O. and Ogwu, Stella. 1999. Influence of Parents Socio-Economic Status on Students Academic Performance : Implications For The Planning Of Universal Basic Education Programme. Jakarta : Ministry of Education and Culture.

Ornstein, Allan C., Levine Daniel U., Gutek, Gerald L., Vocke, David E. 2011. Foundations of Education. Belmont : Wadsworth.

Portes, A and D. MacLeod. 1996. Educational progress of children of immigrants: the role of class, ethnicity and school context. Sociology of Education, 69, 255-75.

Rubinfield, D. 1977. Voting in a local school election: A micro analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics. 59: 30-42.

Smith, Mark K. dkk. 2009. Teori Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran. Jogjakarta : Mirza Media Pustaka.

Soejoto, Ady. 2007. Dukungan Dunia Industri dan Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Terhadap Mutu Lulusan Satuan Pendidikan. Disertasi : tidak diterbitkan.

Stronge, James H. etc. 2004. Handbook For Qualities Of Effective Teachers. Virginia : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Suliyanto. 2006. Metode Riset Bisnis. Yogyakarta : Andi Offset.

Todaro, Michael P.; Smith, Stephen C. 2006. Ekonomi Pembangunan. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.

Todaro, Michael P.; Smith, Stephen C. 2012. Economic development. Boston : Pearson Education, Inc.

VanderStoep, Scott W. and Johnston, Deirdre D. 2009. Research Methods For Everyday Life : Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. San
Fancisco : Jossey-Bass.

Wilson, William Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner-city, the
Underclass and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.