Apakah Tingkat Pendidikan Kepala Rumah Tangga Mempengaruhi Kesejahteraan Rumah Tangga? Studi Kasus Data Rumah Tangga Indonesia (IFLS)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa pengaruh antara tingkat pendidikan kepala rumah tangga terhadap kesejahteraan rumah tangga di Indonesia. Model regresi logistic multinomial telah diperkirakan dengan peluang rumah tangga meraih kesejahteraan sebagai variable dependen dan satu set tingkat pendidikan yang ditempuh semua rumah tangga sebagai variable penjelas. Data diperoleh dari Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS) dengan penggunaan data longitudinal, IFLS 2000, 2007, dan 2014. Salah satu hasil utama adalah probabilitas rumah tangga meraih kesejahteraan lebih dapat diterima oleh rumah tangga dengan pendidikan SMA ke bawah. Resiko tidak sejahtera justru dimiliki oleh kepala rumah tangga yang berpendidikan SMA hingga perguruan tinggi. Hasil penting lainnya sesuai dengan analisa statistiknya adalah pengeluaran tertinggi terletak pada kepala rumah tangga berpendidikan SD dan yang ke dua ialah kepala rumah tangga berpendidikan SMA.
Kata Kunci: Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Rumah Tangga, Pengeluaran dan Kesejahteraan Rumah Tangga
ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze the influence of the level of education of the head of the household on the welfare of households in Indonesia. The multinomial logistic regression model has been estimated with the opportunity for households to achieve well-being as the dependent variable and a set of education levels taken by all households as explanatory variables. Data were obtained from the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS) with the use of longitudinal data, IFLS 2000, 2007, and 2014. One of the main results was the probability of households achieving welfare more acceptable to households with lower secondary education. The risk of not being welfare is actually owned by the head of the household who has a high school education to college. Other important results according to the statistical analysis are the highest expenditure lies in the head of the household with elementary education and the second is the head of the household with high school education.
Keywords: Education, Economics, Household, Expenditure and Household Welfare.
Downloads
Article Details
Author(s) who wish to publish with Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan should agree to the following terms:
- Author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal for noncommercial purposes.
- Author(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals' published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
The publisher publishes and distributes the Article with the copyright notice to the Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan with the article license CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
DAFTAR RUJUKAN
Ariefianto, Moch. Doddy. 2012." Ekonometrika esensi dan aplikasi dengan menggunakan EViews. Jakarta: ERLANGGA.
Akerele, D. and Adewuyi, S.A. 2010. Analysis of Poverty Profiles and Socioeconomic Determinants of Welfare among Urban Households of Ekiti State, Nigeria. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences 3(1): 1-7, 2011. ISSN: 2041-3246
Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Asmin, Ferdinal. 2018. Budayadan Pembangunan Ekonomi: Sebuah Kajian Terhadap Artikel Chavosbashi dan Kawan-Kawan. Journal Studi Komunikasi.Vol.2.Ed.2.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321865902
Becker, Gary S. (1957, 1971). The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2nd edition.
B.Grusky (Ed.), Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective. Boulder: Westview Press, 365-83.
Bian, Yanjie. 1997. "Bringing Strong-ties Back In Indirect Ties, Network Bridges, and Job Searches in China". American Sociological Review(64): 366-85.
Bilenkisi, Fikret. Gungor, Mahmut Sami. and Tamsin, Gulcin. 2015. The Impact of Household Heads Education Levels on the Poverty Risk: The Evidence from Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. DOI 10.12738/estp.2015.2.2354.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), 2016, Indeks Kesejahteraan Rakyat, Badan Pusat Statistik,Jakarta.https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2016/11/23/f6d6e8896c13653e09ae0862/indikator-kesejahteraan-rakyat-2016.html. diakses 05 Mei 2019
Bungin, H. (2005). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif-Komunikasi, Ekonomi, dan Kebijakan Publik Serta Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Lainnya - EdisiKedua. Jakarta: KENCANA.
Chavoshbashi, F., Ghadami, M., Broumand, Z., &Marzban, F. (2012). Designing a dynamic model for measuring the effects of cultural values on Irans economic growth. African Journal of Business Management, 6(26), 77997815. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.2473.
David B. Grusky, (1994) Social Stratification: Race. Class and Gender in Sociological Perspective. Boulder: Westview Press, 260-64.
Esenaliev, Damir. dan Susan Steiner. 2014. Ethnicity and The Distribution of Welfare: Evidence From Southern Kyrgyzstan.
Fjelde, Hanne. Dan Gurdun Otsby. Socioeconomic Inequality and Communal Conflict: Disaggregated Analysis of Sub Saharan Africa, 1990-2008. International Interactions, 40:737762, 2014. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Gounder, R dan Xing, Z. 2012. Impact of Education and Health on Poverty Reduction: Monetary and Non-Monetary Evidence from Fiji. Economic Modelling 29 (2012) 787-794.
Kittler, Pamela G. dan Kathryn P. Sucher. 2008. Food and Culture. Belmont: Thomson Wads-Worth
Levi-Strauss C., 1983. The way of the masks. Cape, London
Liliweri, Alo. Prasangka dan Konflik, LKiS Pelangi Aksara, 2005, Halaman 29-30.
Lind, Jo Thori. 2000. The Use of Household Welfare Functions to Estimate Equivalence Scales. Statistic Norway Research Departement. Page 1-66.
Moeljono, D. 2003. Budaya Korporatdan Keunggulan Korporasi.Penerbit
Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.
Moxon, D. (2011). Consumer culture and the 2011 œRiots.Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 15.
Mulyanto, 2005. Kemiskinan dan Kebutuhan Pokok. Rajawali. Jakarta
Onyango, R. and E. Mukudi, 2002. Nutrition and Gender: A Foundation for Development. Brief 7 of 12, UN ACC/SCN, Geneva.
RAND Corporation. (2016). The Fifth Wave of the Indonesia Family Life. RAND LABOR AND POPULATION, Volume 1. Retrieved from RAND LABOR AND POPULATION: https://www.rand.org/labor/FLS/IFLS/ifls5.html.
Ruel, M.T ., J.L. Garratt, S.S. Morris, D. Maxwell, A. Oshaug, P. Engle, P. Menon, A. Slack and, L. Haddad, 1998. Urban challenges to foods and nutrition security: A review of food security health and caregiving in cities. FCND Discussion paper no. 51. IFPRI.
Samuelson dan Nordhaus. 1995. Makroekonomi. Media Global Edukasi. Jakarta
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wuryandari, Ratna Dewi. 2011. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pengeluaran Makanan, Pendidikan, dan Kesehatan Rumah Tangga Indonesia (Analisis Data Susenas 2011). Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia | Vol. 10 No. 1 Juni 2015 | 27-42.