Reviewers

Acknowledgement

The quality of JATI depends on the generosity, expertise, and rigor of its reviewers. The editorial team sincerely thanks everyone who gives their time to evaluate manuscripts. Their constructive feedback helps authors strengthen their work and helps the journal maintain high scholarly standards.

Reviewer Panel

  1. Taufik Hidayat, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia. Scopus ID: 60613856000 / Google Scholar
  2. Adri Nofrianto, STKIP YDB Lubuk Alung, Indonesia. Scopus ID: 57212950934 / SINTA ID: 5983860
  3. Dr. Rashmi Ranjan Panigrahi, XIM University, India. Scopus ID: 57212109579 / Google Scholar
  4. Dr. Sanghita Basu, RuVision Thinking Labs; former IIT Bombay, India. Scopus ID: 56116848000 / Google Scholar
  5. Dr. Vidyabharathi D., Sona College of Technology, India. Scopus ID: 57226744279 / Google Scholar
  6. Dr. Jami Venkata Suman, GMR Institute of Technology, India. Scopus ID: 56905350500 / Google Scholar
  7. Dr. Khushi Gupta, University of North Georgia, United States. Scopus ID: 57201321895 / Google Scholar
  8. Rizkiana Sidqiyatul Hamdani, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia. Scopus ID: 57216337246 / Google Scholar
  9. Astri Winandari Berlin, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia. Scopus ID: 60706890300 / Google Scholar
  10. Arief Indriarto Haris, BRIN / IPB University, Indonesia. Scopus ID: 58074426300 / Google Scholar
  11. Agrima Seth, Ph.D., Microsoft Research, United States. Scopus ID: 57219500967 / Google Scholar
  12. Nishanshi Shukla, Ph.D., The University of Texas at Dallas, United States. Scopus ID: 59662602300 / Google Scholar
  13. Prof. Dr. Zubaidah Amir MZ, UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, Indonesia. Scopus ID: 57202602934 / Google Scholar
  14. Wazir Ali, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Pakistan. Scopus ID: 59721525100 / Google Scholar
  15. Prof. Dr. Tarun Kumar Vashishth, Vidya University, India. Scopus ID: 58559505700 / Google Scholar
  16. Dr. Prabhat Mathur, Aishwarya College of Education, Jodhpur, India. Google Scholar
  17. Dr. Pallab Das, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Scopus ID: 57194535747 / Google Scholar
  18. Dr. Samithamby Senthilnathan, Eastern University, Sri Lanka. Scopus ID: 57226141483 / Google Scholar
  19. Dr. Vinoth N. A. S., SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India. Scopus ID: 57211291356 / Google Scholar
  20. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Muhamad Arif, Institut Al Azhar Menganti Gresik, Indonesia. Scopus ID: 58738652900 / Google Scholar

Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewers are expected to:

  1. Respect confidentiality. Treat the manuscript as a confidential document and not share or use its content.
  2. Declare conflicts of interest. Decline the invitation if there is a collaboration, institutional relationship, or other bias with the authors.
  3. Be timely. Respond to the invitation within 5 days and complete the review within 2-3 weeks.
  4. Be objective and constructive. Give specific, respectful, and actionable comments, with reasons for the recommendation.
  5. Evaluate against JATI’s criteria. Fit with scope, originality, theoretical grounding, methodological rigor, evidence of impact, clarity, and ethical integrity (see Peer Review Process).
  6. Follow the AI policy. Do not upload manuscripts to public generative AI tools (see AI Usage Policy).
  7. Flag concerns. Inform the editor of suspected plagiarism, data problems, duplicate publication, or ethical violations.

Become a Reviewer

JATI welcomes scholars and practitioners with expertise in transformative learning, social innovation, education, community engagement, or related fields. To volunteer, please send the following to [email protected]:

  • Your full name, affiliation, and ORCID iD
  • Your areas of expertise and keywords
  • A short CV or link to your Google Scholar or Scopus profile
  • Your preferred language of review (English)

Alternatively, register on the journal website at https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jati/user/register and select the Reviewer role, adding your review interests.

Recognition

  • Reviewer certificate issued upon request for each completed review
  • Public acknowledgement on this page and in the annual issue
  • Priority consideration for the editorial board for outstanding reviewers
  • Verification of review activity through platforms such as Web of Science Reviewer Recognition (formerly Publons) and ORCID, where available