The Effort to Realize Government Effectiveness Through Implementation Fully Accrual Accounting and Control Against Corruption
Keywords:
Government Effectiveness; Accrual Accounting; Control of Corruption Corruption Perception Index.Abstract
This study aims to analyze how far the influence of the implementation of the accrual accounting public sector on government and control of corruption can increase government effectiveness. Using cross-country data for 2020 with a final sample of 194 countries, the results of this study show that the accrual accounting public sector and the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) has a positive effect on government effectiveness. This means that countries that fully adopt accrual accounting and/or have control of corruption (a high Corruption Perception Index score) tend to have better government effectiveness, and vice versa. The results of this study imply that it is necessary to fully implement accrual accounting-based government financial reporting. In addition, to increase government effectiveness, it is necessary to make effective law enforcement and control strategies to prevent corruption.
References
Ace, K. (2014). Debate: New guidance to improve public sector governance. Public Money & Management, 6, 405–406.
Adhikari, P., Kuruppu C., Matilal, S. (2013). Dissemination and institutionalization of public sector accounting reforms in less developed countries: A comparative study of the Nepalase and Sri Lankan central governments. Accounting Forum, 37, 213–230.
Ajie, H. A , Wokekoro, O, E. (2015). The impact of corruption on suistanable economic growth and development in Nigeria. International Journal of Economic Development Research and Investment, 15, 143–177.
Akai, N, Sakata, M. (2002). Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: evidence from state. Journal of Urban Economics, 1, 93–108.
Andersen, T. B. (2009). E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy, 21, 201–210.
Blackburn, K. (2012). Corruption and development: explaining the evidence. The Manchester School, 4, 401–428.
Brewer, G. A., Choi, Y., & Walker, R. M. (2008). Linking accountability corruption, adn governemnt effectiveness in Asia: an examination of World Bank governance indicators. Democracy, Corruption, and Government Trust, 17, 227–245.
Brusca, I, Gomez-villegas, M, Montesinos, V. (2016). Public Financial management reforms: The role of IPSAS in Latin-America. Public Administration and Development, 1, 51–64.
Brusca I, Montesinos V, C. D. (2013). Legitimating International Public Sector Accounting Standars (IPSAS). Public Money & Management, 33, 437–444.
Carnegie, G, Wolnizer, P. (1999). Unravelling the rhetoric about the financial reporting of public collections as assets. Australian Accounting Review, 17, 16–21.
Champoux, M. (2006). Masalah dan solusi, seminar kebijakan anggaran. 2018, 13.
CHen, L, Aklikokou, A. . (2021). Relating e-government development to government effectiveness and control of corruption: a cluster analysis. Journal of Chinese Governance, 1, 155–173.
Cohen, S, Guillamon, M, D, Lapsley, I, R. G. (2015). Accounting for austerity: the Troika in the Eurozone. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 6, 966–992.
Dunn, W. N. 2003. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Edisi Kedua. In Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik.
Furqan, A. C., Wardhani, R., Martani, D., & Setyaningrum, D. (2020). The effect of audit findings and audit recommendation follow-up on the financial report and public service quality in Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(5), 535–559.
Garcia-Sanchez I. M, Rodriguez-Ariza L, Frias-Aceituno, J. . (2013). The cultural system and integrated reporting. International Business Review, 5, 828–838.
Hodge, A. Shankar, S., Rao, D.P., Duhs, A. (2011). Exploring the links between corruption and growth. Review of Development Economics, 3, 474–490.
Hyndman, N, Connolly, C. (2011). Accruals accounting in the public sector: a road not always taken. Management Accounting Research, 1, 36–45.
Kim, M, Voorhees, M. (2011). Government Effectiveness and Institutional trust in japan, south korea and china. Asian Politics & Policy, 3, 413–432.
Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The methodology of the corruption perceptions index 2007. Internet Center for Corruption Research.
Lehman, G, Thome, K. (2015). Corruption, criminality and the privatised state: the implications for accounting. Accounting Forum, 39, 366–370.
Lewi, M. (2006). Mengapa kita membutuhkan teori baru tentang pemerintahan, perspektif politik.
Mbelwa, L. (2015). Factors influencing the use of accounting information in Tanzanian local government authorities (LGAs): an institutional theory approach: In the Public Sector Accouting. Accountability and Auditing in Emerging Economies, 15, 143–177.
Moslemi, L., Tabari, M. G., Montazeri, S., & Tadayon, M. (2012). The frequency and several effective factors on baby blues. HealthMED, 6(12), 4004–4008.
Nakmahachalasint, O, Narktabtee, K. (2019). Implementation of accrual accounting in Thailand’s central government. Public Money & Management, 2, 139–147.
Neu, D, Everett, J, Rahaman, A, S, M. D. (2013). Accounting and networks of corruption. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6–7, 505–525.
Nugroho, R. (2023). Public Policy 7: DInamika Kebijakan Publik, Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Manajemen Politik Kebijakan Publik. PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Olken. B.A, P. R. (2012). Corruption in developing countries. Annu Rev. Econ, 1, 479–509.
Razafindrakoto. M, Roubaud, F. (2010). Are international databases on corruption reliable? A comparison of expert opinion surveys and household surveys in sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 8, 1057–1069.
United, N. (2014). E-Government Survey: e-Government for the Future We Want. United Nations.
World Bank. (2018). Kondisi Jaring Pengaman Sosial 2018. DC: Bank Dunia.
Zouaoui, A. (2017). World Corruption Perception Index Analysis. 8(24), 85–91.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Faradila S. Saud Saud
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Abstract views: 109
