The Quality of Sustainability Reporting in Indonesia: Government, Employee, Competitor, and Customer Perspectives

Authors

  • Muhammad Adzan Ramadhan Accounting Departement, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Riau
  • Emrinaldi Nur DP Accounting Departement, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Riau
  • Rezi Abdurrahman Accounting Departement, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Riau
  • Armensyah Lubis Queen Mary, University of London, School of Economics and Finance

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v16n1.p39-54

Keywords:

Quality, Sustainability Report, Environment, Stakeholder

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objectives: This research examines the influence of government engagement, employee engagement, competitor engagement, and customer engagement on the quality of sustainability reports for energy and basic materials companies listed on the IDX for the 2019-2022 period. Background Problems: Based on the rankings in ASSRAT from 2018-2020, public company participation in disclosing sustainability reports still needs to be higher, and from the ranking results, many companies declined from 2018 to 2022. Novelty: In previous studies, most research was conducted on the disclosure of sustainability reports, but this research focuses on the quality of sustainability reports in Indonesia. Research Methods: The population in this research is energy and basic materials companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2019-2022 period. The sampling technique in this research used a purposive sampling technique, and a sample of 30 companies was obtained. The data analysis method used is logistic regression analysis. Finding/Results: The results of this research show that government engagement and customer engagement influence the quality of sustainability reports, while competitors' engagement and employee engagement have no influence on the quality of sustainability reports. Conclusion: Based on the test results, government engagement and customer engagement have an influence on the quality of sustainability reports. Therefore, the increasing government engagement and customer engagement that companies have will certainly improve company the quality of sustainability reports.

References

Agus Ardiana, P. (2019). Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Reporting: Evidence of Reputation Risk Management in Large Australian Companies JEL Classification. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12293

Ardiana, P. A. (2021). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting by Fortune Global 500 companies: a call for embeddedness. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(2), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2019-0666

Berthelot, S., Coulmont, M., & Serret, V. (2012). Do Investors Value Sustainability Reports? A Canadian Study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(6), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.285

Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2020). Research Method for Business A Skill Building Approach 8th Edition.

Chang, W. F., Amran, A., Iranmanesh, M., & Foroughi, B. (2019). Drivers of sustainability reporting quality: financial institution perspective. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35(4), 632–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-01-2019-0006

Derdjo Djony Saputro, Sonivia Gunawan, & Zulkarnain, Z. (2022). The Effect of Stakeholder Pressure on Sustainability Report Transparency. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Finansial Indonesia, 5(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31629/jiafi.v5i2.4202

Erin, O., Adegboye, A., & Bamigboye, O. A. (2022). Corporate Governance and Sustainability Reporting Quality: Evidence from Nigeria. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(3), 680–707.

Fais Muta’as Sidiq, Lidya Primta Surbakti, R. S. (2020). Disclosure of Sustainability Report Based on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 5(4), 469–484.

Fitranadi, A. P., Widodo, T., & Goniah, G. (2021). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Loyalty with the Mediator Variable of Company Image at PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk. E-Proceeding of Management, 8(6), 8113–8126.

Ghozali, I. (2018a). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Ghozali, I. (2018b). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic Econometrics. In The McGraw-Hill.

Iglesias, Y., & Andriana, D. (2017). The Effect of Voluntary Disclosure in Annual Reports on Earnings Quality in Mining Companies. Jurnal Aset (Akuntansi Riset), 9(1), 187-198, https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v9i1.5262

Laine, M., Tregidga, H., & Unerman, J. (2021). Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (3rd Edition). Routledge.

NCCR. (2022). Siaran-Pers-REV-1-2.

Qisthi, F., & Fitri, M. (2020). The Effect of Stakeholder Engagement on Sustainability Report Disclosure based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 5(4), 469–484.

Rizkika Alfaiz, D., & Aryati, T. (2019). The Effect of Stakeholder Pressure and Financial Performance on the Quality of Sustainability Report with Audit Committee as Moderating Variable. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Methodist, 2(2), 112–130.

Rudyanto, A., & Siregar, S. V. (2018). The effect of stakeholder pressure and corporate governance on the sustainability report quality. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2017-0071

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta: Bandung

Wang, C. C. (2020). Corporate social responsibility on customer behaviour: the mediating role of corporate image and customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 31(7–8), pp. 742–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1444985

Downloads

Published

2024-10-05

How to Cite

Ramadhan, M. A., Emrinaldi Nur DP, Rezi Abdurrahman, & Lubis, A. . (2024). The Quality of Sustainability Reporting in Indonesia: Government, Employee, Competitor, and Customer Perspectives . AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 16(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v16n1.p39-54
Abstract views: 97 , PDF Downloads: 65