Comparative Analysis Study of Audit Quality in Indonesia and Global
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v16n2.p178-193Keywords:
audit quality, independence, fees, tenure audit, PCAOBAbstract
Introduction/Main Objectives: This study applies the Krippendorff method, which aims to analyze the characteristics, themes, and concepts of audit quality research conducted by Indonesian and global researchers. Background Problems: Audit quality is a measurement often used to assess auditor performance. Novelty: This study identified articles with the keyword "audit quality" obtained from the Garuda Ministry of Education and Culture portal as representatives of the Indonesian research group and International journals (Scopus & Science Direct) as representatives of the global group. Research Method: This study applies content analysis that traces articles about audit quality using Leximancer software (version 4.5). This study used 75 articles from the journal Scopus, 75 articles from Science Direct journals and 53 from the Garuda portal. Finding/Results: The results from this analysis indicate fundamental similarities in the two research clusters, in which audit tenure, fees, and independence influence the majority of audit quality. Differences in the Indonesian cluster research focus more on the concept of assessment, pressure, and level of complexity. In contrast, the global research group mainly influences audit quality by turnover, capacity, and impact. Conclusion: Similar determinants in Indonesia and globally are independence, cost, and tenure, although the percentage of relevance and prominence is different. The difference between audit quality in Indonesia and audit quality globally is that audit quality in Indonesia focuses more on the concepts of judgement, pressure, and level of complexity. In contrast, turnover, capacity, and impact influence audit quality globally
References
Ardini, L. (2010). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Akuntabilitas Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Majalah Ekonomi Tahun XX, 3, 6–7.
Christiani, I., & Nugrahanti, Y. W. (2014). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit Terhadap Manajemen Laba. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 16(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.16.1.52-62
Christiawan, Y. J. (2002). Competence and Independence of Public Accountants: Reflections on Empirical Research Results. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 4(2), 79–92.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.
Dickins, D., Johnson-Snyder, A. J., & Reisch, J. T. (2018). Selecting an auditor for Bradco using indicators of audit quality. Journal of Accounting Education, 45(August 2017), pp. 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2018.07.001
Friedl, D. (2016). Book Review. The International Journal of Accounting, 51(2), 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2016.04.011
Habib, A. (2011). Audit firm industry specialization and audit outcomes: Insights from academic literature. Research in Accounting Regulation, 23(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.racreg.2011.06.008
Haeridistia, N., & Agustin. (2019). The effect of independence, professional ethics, and auditor experience on audit quality. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(2), 24–27.
Harding, N., Azim, M. I., Jidin, R., & Muir, J. P. (2016). A Consideration of Literature on Trust and Distrust as they Relate to Auditor Professional Scepticism. Australian Accounting Review, 26(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12126
Hasanuddin, R., & Sjahruddin, H. (2017). The Structure of Emotional Intelligence, Spiritual Intelligence and Its Relationship with Work Enthusiasm and Auditor Performance. World Journal of Business and Management, 3(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.5296/wjbm.v3i1.11321
I, E. Y., Rohman, H. A., & Handayani, H. R. S. (2008). Pengaruh Identifikasi Auditor atas Klien Terhadap Objektivitas Auditor dengan Auditor Tenure , Client Importance dan Client Image sebagai Variabel anteseden. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 1–31. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/17120
Jensen, M. C. (1976). Reflections on the State of Accounting Research and the Regulation of Accounting.
Kurniasih, M., & Rohamn, A. (2014). Pengaruh Fee Audit, Audit Tenure, Dan Rotasi Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit Margi. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(3), 1–9. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting
Lastanti, H. S. (2005). Tinjauan terhadap kompetensi dan independensi akuntan publik: Refleksi atas skandal keuangan. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi, 5(1), 85–97.
Le, T. T., Nguyen, T. M. A., Do, V. Q., & Ngo, T. H. C. (2022). Risk-based approach and quality of independent audit using structure equation modelling – Evidence from Vietnam. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2022.100196
López, D. M., & Peters, G. F. (2010). Internal control reporting differences among public and governmental auditors: The case of city and county Circular A-133 audits. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(5), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.06.003
Mande, V., Son, M., & Song, H. (2017). Auditor search periods as signals of engagement risk: Effects on auditor choice and audit pricing. Advances in Accounting, 37, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2017.03.001
Mardijuwono, A. W., & Subianto, C. (2018). Independence, professionalism, professional scepticism: The relation toward the resulted from audit quality. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-0009
Meutia, I. (2004). Pengaruh independensi auditor terhadap manajemen laba untuk KAP big 5 dan non big 5. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(3).
Nehme, R. (2017). Performance evaluation of auditors: a constructive or a destructive tool of audit output. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2016-1446
Ocak, M., & Kurt, E. S. (2019). Does auditor education affect audit opinion? An empirical study of Turkish listed firms. Global Business and Economics Review, 21(5), 646–665. https://doi.org/10.1504/GBER.2019.101872
Rahmina, L. Y., & Agoes, S. (2014). Influence of Auditor Independence, Audit Tenure, and Audit Fee on Audit Quality of Members of Capital Market Accountant Forum in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164(August), pp. 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.083
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Koerniawan Dwi Wibawa, lely kumalawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 94
,
PDF Downloads: 80
