The Effectiveness of Contextual Learning in Financial Mathematics Problem for Senior High School

Authors

  • Mega Kurniawati UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jomp.v1n2.p%25p

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe contextual learning about financial math problems for secondary high school students. This study begins with development research of learning tools using the 4-D model of Thiagarajan which consists of defined, designed, developed, and disseminated. The research subjects were students of grade 9 of SMK Prapanca 2 Surabaya. Three classes were randomly selected as a pilot test class, experimental class, and control class. The pilot class and the experimental class used a contextual learning model. While the control class uses a conventional learning model. The results showed that classical learning reached 9.268% of the experimental class students increased by 75% of the maximum score, effective student activity during learning, the ability of teachers to manage effective learning, and student responses to positive learning. While the classical learning completeness for the control class is classified as incomplete because only 78.05% of students exceed 75% of the maximum score. Based on inferential statistical analysis, the conclusions obtained from this study are the learning outcomes of students who take contextual learning better than the learning outcomes of students who take conventional learning.

Keywords: Learning Outcomes, Contextual Learning, Financial Mathematics Problems

Author Biography

Mega Kurniawati, UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Mathematics Education

References

<p>Arends, R. I. (2012). <em>Learning to Tech</em>. New York: Megraw-Hill Companies.</p><p>Arikunto, S. (2012). <em>Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan</em>. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.</p><p>Fathani, A. H. (2009). <em>Matematika Hakekat dan logika</em>. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.</p><p>Ferguson, G.A. (1989). <em>Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education</em>. Sixth Edition. Singapore: McGraw Hill International Book Co.</p><p>Johnson, E. B. (2002). <em>Contextual Teaching and Learning</em>. California: Corwin Press.</p><p>Komalasari, K. (2010). <em>Pembelajaran Kontekstual Konsep dan Aplikasinya</em>. Bandung: Refika Aditama.</p><p>Neter, J. &amp; Wasserman, W. (1974). <em>Applied Linier Statistical Models</em>. Illionis: Richard d. Erwin, Inc.</p><p>Nurhadi &amp; Senduk, A.G. (2009). <em>Pembelajaran Kontekstual</em>. Malang: PT. JePe Press Media Utama.</p><p>Putra, S. R. (2013). <em>Desain Belajar Mengajar Kreatif Berbasis Sains</em>. Jogjakarta : DIVA Press (Anggota IKAPI).</p><p>Ruseffendi. (1992). <em>Pendidikan Matematika 3</em>. Jakarta: Depdikbud</p><p>Saud, U. S. (2008). <em>Inovasi Pendidikan</em>. Bandung: Alfa Beta.</p><p>Sanjaya, W. (2013). <em>Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan</em>. Jakarta : Kencana Prenadamedia Group.</p><p>Setyaningrum, Yanur, &amp; Husamah. (2013). <em>Desain Pembelajaran Berbasis Pencapaian Kompetensi</em>. Jakarta : Prestasi Pustakarya.</p><p>Soedjadi, R. (2000). <em>Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia</em>. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.</p><p>Slavin, R. E. (2011). <em>Psikologi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktek Edisi ke-9 Jilid 2</em>. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.</p><p>Sunartombs. (2009). <em>Pembelajaran konvensional Banyak dikritik namun Paling disukai</em>. Available: http//www.sunartombs.wordpress.com. 2 Agustus 2015</p><p>Thiagarajan, S., Sammel, D.S., dan Semmel, M.I. (1974). <em>Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children</em>. Minnesota: University of Minnesota</p><p>UNESA. (2000<em>). Pedoman Penulisan Artikel Jurnal</em>.  Surabaya: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Negeri Surabaya.</p><p>Yamin, M. (2013<em>). Strategi &amp; Metode Dalam Model Pembelajaran</em>. Jakarta: Referensi GP Press Group.</p>

Downloads

Published

2020-08-30

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 137 , PDF Downloads: 72