Problem Solving Process of AKM Algebra Content in Junior High School Students Reviewed from Extrovert and Introvert Personality Types
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jomp.v6n1.p14-25Keywords:
problem solving process, AKM, extrovert, introvertAbstract
This study aims to describe the problem-solving process of AKM algebra content in junior high school students with extrovert and introvert personality types. This study is a descriptive-qualitative study conducted in class VIII of junior high schools in Sidoarjo Regency. The subjects in this study consisted of 2 students with equal mathematical abilities, namely 1 extrovert student and 1 introvert student. The research instruments were in the form of MBTI personality type questionnaires, TPM AKM questions, and interview guidelines. Data analysis techniques were carried out through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study showed that the problem-solving process of AKM extrovert students in understanding problems was to use symbols and not write to state what was asked, while introvert students used symbols and wrote to state what was known and what was asked. In the step of making a plan, extrovert and introvert students can consider the strategies used in solving the problem. In the step of implementing the plan, extrovert and introvert students use the chosen strategy to solve the problem. In implementing the plan, introvert students check all steps repeatedly while extrovert students check only part of the steps. Then, in the review step, extroverted students only rechecked some of their solutions, while introverted students rechecked all of their solutions. Finally, the results of this study can provide information for teachers as consideration and input so that they can develop students' problem-solving processes during learning.
References
Desmita. (2014). Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Folger, T. D., Stewart, M., Bostic, J., & May, T. A. (2022). Validating The Use of Student-Level Instruments to Examine Preservice Teachers’ Mathematical Problem Solving. School Science and Mathematics, 122(8), 417–428. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12558
Huitt, W. (1992). Problem Solving and Decision Making: Consideration of Individual Differences Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. 24, 33–44.
Kemendikbud. (2020). Desain Pengembangan Soal AKM. Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kusuma, A. P., Waluya, S. B., & Mariani, S. (2024). Algebraic Thinking Profile of Pre-Service Teachers in Solving Mathematical Problems in Relation to Their Self-Efficacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(11), 1–15. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/15580
Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage, London.
Novitasari, D. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar Negeri di Kota Cirebon. Skripsi: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Okike, E. U., & Amoo, O. A. (2014). Problem Solving and Decision Making: Consideration of Individual Differences in Computer Programming Skills Using Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and Chidamber and Kemerer Java Metrics (CKJM). 7(1), 27–34.
Olivares, D., Lupiáñez, J. L., & Segovia, I. (2021). Roles and Characteristics of Problem Solving in the Mathematics Curriculum: A Review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(7), 1079–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1738579
Polya, G. (1973). How To Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Prayoga, M. F., Safitri, D., Fahmi, F., & Damanik, M. H. (2021). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Division Untuk Mengetahui Perbedaan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 6(2). https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/mesuisu
Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Rini, D. E. P., Prabawanto, S., & Fakhrunisa, F. (2020). How Are the Students’ Steps in Solving Mathematical Problems? Proceedings of the 2020 The 6th International Conference on Frontiers of Educational Technologies, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404709.3404715
Rivai, A., Lestari, A., Munir, N. P., & Anas, A. (2023). Students’ Mathematical Literacy in Solving PISA Problems Observed by Learning Styles. Mathematics Education Journal, 17(1), 121–134. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.17.1.19905.121-134
Salvia, N. Z., Sabrina, F. P., & Maula, I. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Peserta Didik Ditinjau dari Kecemasan Matematika. 3(1), 351–360.
Sari, A. A., & Kurniasari, I. (2022). Perbedaan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa pada Materi SPLTV Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Ekstrovert dan Introvert. MATHEdunesa, 11(3), 938–947. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n3.p938-947
Suryabrata, S. (2016). Psikologi Kepribadian. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Wulandari, C. P., Hidayanto, E., & Dwiyana. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. 23–28.
Abstract views: 7
,
PDF Downloads: 5
