Creative Thinking Process of Prospective Elementary Education Teacher Students Based on Field Independent Cognitive Styles and Self-Efficacy in Solving Contextual Problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jomp.v5n2.p67-75Keywords:
field independent cognitive style, creative thinking process, mathematics contextual, self-efficacyAbstract
This study aims to describe the creative thinking process of prospective elementary school teachers based on independent field cognitive style and self-efficacy in solving contextual problems. This qualitative-exploratory study involved two prospective elementary school teachers who had independent field cognitive style and self-efficacy. Data collection was conducted through task-based interviews and analysis using interactive methods consisting of data condensation, data presentation, data interpretation and verification. The results showed that prospective elementary school teachers with independent field cognitive style and high self-efficacy had better creative thinking processes than prospective elementary school teachers with independent field cognitive style and low self-efficacy. Prospective elementary school teachers with independent field cognitive style and high self-efficacy in synthesizing ideas understood information well, and met the criteria for creative thinking in terms of fluency, flexibility and novelty. Meanwhile, prospective elementary school teachers with independent field cognitive style and low self-efficacy did not see the provisions in the questions given well, and only met the fluency criteria aspect.
References
Alwisol. (2014). Psikologi Kepribadian (Edisi Revisi). Malang: UMMPress.
Amini, A., Nufus, H., & Agustin, E. Identifikasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dari Sudut Pandang Gaya Kognitif dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Juring (Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 6(3), 285-294.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ausburn, L. J., & Ausburn, F. B. (1978). Visual literacy: Background, theory and practice. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 15(4), 291-297.
Azlina, A. d. (2017). Creativity of Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Students in Mathematics Problem Posing. MISEIC. Surabaya: UNESA.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. US: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V Ramachaudran (Ed) Encyclopedia Of Human Behaviour (Vol 4, PP, 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
Bandura, A. (2005). Theories Of Personality, SIxth Edition Social Cognitive Theory. New York: The Mc Graw-Hill Companies.
Batens, D. (1999). Contextual Problem Solving and Adaptive Logics In Creative Processes. Philosophica, 7-31.
Bell, F. (1981). Teaching and Learning Mathematics (in secondary school). Wm: Brown Publisher.
Borich, d. T. (1995). Educational Psychology: A Contemporary of Educational Goals. New York: Harpe Collins College Publisher.
Briggs, M. &. (2007). Creative Teaching: Mathematics in The Early Years and Primary. London: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203826294.
Creswell, J. (2014). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Remaja.
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design : Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Daher, G. d. (2021). Self-efficacy in creativity and curiosity as predicting creative emotions. JRAMathEdu, https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jramathedu/article/view/12667.
Gravemeijer, D. (1999). Context Problems in Realistic Mathematics Education: A Calculus Course as an Example. Educational Studies In Mathematics, 111-129.
Isroil, B. d. (2017). Profil Berpikir Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika di tinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 93-105.
Japers, S. B. (2004). The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design. International Journal of Medical Informatic, 781-795.
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1995). The New Sourcebook for Teaching Reasoning and Problem Solving in Elementary School. A Longwood Professional Book. Allyn & Bacon, 111 Tenth St., Des Moines, IA 50309.
Marpaung, Y. (1986). Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Pembentukan Konsep Algoritma Matematis. Makalah Pidato Dies Natalies XXXI IKIP Sanata Dharma Salatiga, 25.
Maxwell, J. (2004). Developing the Leader Within You Workbook. New York: Injoy, Inc.
Miles, M. H. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook. USA: Sage Publications Edition 3 Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press.
Miller, A. L. (2007). Creativity and cognitive style: The relationship between field-dependence-independence, expected evaluation, and creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(4), 243.
Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Morgan, M. (1993). Creating Workforce Innovation: Turning Individual Creativity into Organizational Innovation. Business & Professional Pub.
Ni'mah, N., & Shodikin, A. (2022). Analysis of Students' Creative Thinking in Solving Problems Opportunities Based on Students' Learning. Hipotenusa Journal of Research Mathematics Education (HJRME), 5(1), 1-11.
Rahayu, T. R., Huda, M., & Shodikin, A. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TPS dengan Alat Peraga Rubbik terhadap Self Efficacy Siswa pada Materi Kubus dan Balok. Inspiramatika, 3(2), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.52166/inspiramatika.v3i2.418
Redifer, J. L., Bae, C. L., & Zhao, Q. (2021). Self-efficacy and performance feedback: Impacts on cognitive load during creative thinking. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101395. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959475220306903
Samsiyah, N., & Rudyanto, H. E. (2015). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matetatika Open-Ended Ditinjau Dari Tingkat Kemampuan Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 23-33.
Santrock, J. W. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana.
Siswono, T. Y. E. (2007). Penjenjangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Identifikasi Tahap Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Memecahkan dan Mengajukan Masalah Matematika. In Disertasi. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual review of psychology, 48(1), 609-647.
Pratiwi, S. A., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2020, August). Contextual problem in mathematical problem solving: Core ability in realistic mathematics education. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1613, No. 1, p. 012018). IOP Publishing.
Rizki, M. (2018). Profil pemecahan masalah kontekstual matematika oleh siswa kelompok dasar. Dinamika Penelitian: Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 18(2), 271-286.
Sepeng, P. &. (2014). Sources of difficulty in comprehending and. International Journal of Educational, 217-225.
Shodikin, A., Rohim, A., & Mustofah, M. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kubus Dan Balok Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent Dan Field Dependent. Inspiramatika, 6(1), 50-60.
Siswono, T. Y. E. (2008). Model pembelajaran matematika berbasis pengajuan dan pemecahan masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif. Surabaya: Unesa university press
Solso, R. d. (2007). Psikologi Kognitif. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Sugiyono. (2005). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Abstract views: 114
,
PDF Downloads: 62
