Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Mathematical Story Problems Based on Newman's Theory in View of Student Learning Styles

Authors

  • Siti Maria Ulfa Institut Teknologi dan Sains Nahdlatul Ulama Pasuruan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jomp.v4n2.p97-105

Keywords:

Error Analysis, Newman Error Procedure, Social Arithmetic, , Mathematical Story Problems, Learning Styles

Abstract

This study aims to describe the types of errors experienced by students in solving mathematical word problems based on Newman's theory in terms of the learning styles of junior high school students. This type of research is a qualitative descriptive research. The subjects of this study were class VIII students at SMP Negeri 3 Pasuruan, Pasuruan Regency, for the 2022/2023 academic year. The subjects of this study were 2 students with visual learning styles, 2 students with auditory learning styles, and 2 students with kinesthetic learning styles. Data collection techniques in this study were observation, giving learning style questionnaires, social arithmetic story questions, interviews and documentation. The data obtained was tested for its validity by technical triangulation. The results of this study are 1) Students with a visual learning style tend to make all mistakes except reading and understanding problems, 2) Students with an auditory learning style tend to make all mistakes except reading mistakes and, 3) Students with a kinesthetic learning style also tend to make all errors except read errors.

References

Abdussamad, H. Z., & Sik, M. S. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Makassar: CV. Syakir Media Press.

Adhitiya, Y. (2015). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Smp Kelas Vii Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Materi Segiempat Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Aulia, J., & Kartini, K. (2021). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika pada materi himpunan kelas VII SMP/MTs. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 484-500.

Bogdan, R. C. (1982). Qualitative Research For Education ; An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Budiyono. (2008). Kesalahan Mengerjakan Soal Cerita dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pedagogia, 11(1), 1–8.

Cahyani, C. A., & Sutriyono. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pada Materi Operasi Penjumlahan dan Pengurangan Bentuk Aljabar Bagi Siswa Kelas VII SMP Kristen 2 Salatiga. Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika, Vol. 2(1), 26–30.

Deporter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2008). Quantum Learning : Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Kaifa.

Dian. (2022, April 25). Kemendikbudristek Harap Skor PISA Indonesia Segera Membaik. Radio Edukasi Cerdas, Santun dan Menghibur.

Drownell, P. (2018). The Newman procedure for analyzing primary four pupil errors on written mathematical task: A malaysian perpective. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 8(3), 264–271.

Gunawan, A. W. (2006). Genius Learning Strategi. Pustaka Utama.

Hartono, S. (2018). Original Paper Using Project Based Learning (PBL) Design to Expand Mathematics Students’ Understanding: A Case Study in Statistics Problem. Global Research in Higher Education, 1, 98-104.

Hasanah, R. Z. (2021). Gaya Belajar. Malang: Literasi Nusantara.

Jha, S. (2012). Mathematics Performance of Primary School Students in Assam (India): An Analysis Using Newman Procedure. International Journal of Computer Applicationsin Engineering Sciences, 2(1), 17–21.

Kurniawan, A. P., & Hartono, S. (2020). The Effect of Learning Style on Academic Achievement of Prospective Teachers in Mathematics Education. Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy (JoMP), 2(1).

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Analisis Data Kualitatif ; Buku SUmber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru. UI Press.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasution. (2005). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nasution, S. (2008). Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.

Newman, M. A. (1977). An Analysis Of Sixth Grade Pupils Error on Written Mathematical Tasks. Victorian Institute for Educational Research Bulletin , 31–34.

Ruseffendi. (1994). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang Non-Eksata Lainnya. IKIP Semarang Press.

Satiti, T. (2014). Analisis Dengan Prosedur Newman Terhadap Kesalahan Peserta Didik Kelas VII Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Skripsi. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Singh, P., Rahman, A. A., & Hoon, T. S. (2010). The Newman procedure for analyzing Primary Four pupils errors on written mathematical tasks: A Malaysian perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 264–271.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susilo, M. J. (2006). Gaya Belajar Menjadikan Makin Pintar. Jakarta: Pinus.

Ulfah, H. K., & Fuad, Y. (2019). Analysis of Student Errors in Completing PISA Content Space and Shape Problems Viewed from Vak Learning Style. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika.Volume, 8(3).

Umam, M. D. (2014). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Materi Operasi Hitung Pecahan. Mathedunesa Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(3), 131–134.

Wijaya, A. A., & Masriyah. (2013). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Materi SPLDV. EKUIVALEN-Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1).

Winsky. (2021). Belajar Teknik Asesmen Risiko – Wawancara Terstruktur atau Semi-Terstruktur (Structured/Semi-Structured Interviews – SSI). Indonesia Risk Management Professional Association.

Wiradi, G. (2002). Mempersiapkan Tulisan Ilmiah. Bandung: Akatiga.

Yanuarto, W. N., & Romadona, F. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Newman Error Analysis (NEA) ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. THETA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 1-10.

Yusuf & Amin, M. (2016). Pengaruh mind map dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 1(1), 85-92.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-15

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 35 , PDF Downloads: 34