Analisis Pemberian Wasiat Wajibah terhadap Ahli Waris Beda Agama Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 331 K/Ag/2018

Authors

  • Alip Pamungkas Raharjo Airlangga University
  • Elok Fauzia Dwi Putri Airlangga University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v1n2.p172-185

Keywords:

Non Moslem Heir, Legacy, Moslem Heir, The Supreme Court Decision Number 331 K / AG / 2018

Abstract

In Article 171 letter (c) Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1991 concerning Compilation of Islamic Law affirms that the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs do not obtain inheritance from the inheritor's inheritance. However, in its development because it felt unfair, the Supreme Court through The Supreme Court Decision Number 368.K / AG / 1995 provided a way for joint cooperation of different inheritance through a wasiat wajibah. But in its development, this provision was changed again by a landmark decision from the Supreme Court, namely through the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018 because there was a change in the value of justice in the community. The research method used normative research with constitutional approach, conceptual approach and case approach. This study aims to explain the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs before and after the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018. The results showed that prior to the Supreme Court Decision Number 331 K / AG / 2018, heirs of non muslim religions were given a share of inheritance in the form of a wasiat wajibah for ¾ of the inheritance inheritance. Post the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018, the amount of wasiat wajibah will change to ¼ from the inheritor's inheritance.

 

References

Buku

Alam, Andi Syamsu. (2008). Hukum Pengangkatan Anak Perṣpektif Iṣlam.Jakarta: PT. Kencana

Alkostar,Artidjo. (2008). Dimensi Kebenaran Dalam Putusan Hakim, varia peradilan 281

Basyir, Ahmad Azhar. (2001). Hukum Waris Islam. Yogjakarta: UII Press

Dahlan,Abdul Aziz.(2015). Enṣiklopedi Hukum Iṣlam.Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve

Hoecke,M.V. (2011). Legal doctrine: Which method(s) for what kind of discipline?.Oxford: HART Publishing

Jahar,Asep Saepuddin. (2013). Hukum Keluarga, Pidana dan Bisnis. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media

M.,Anshary. (2013). Hukum Kewarisan Islam Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju

Manan,Abdul. (2008). Aneka Maṣalah Hukum Perdata Iṣlam di Indoneṣia.Jakarta: PT. Kencana Prenada Media Group

Manan, Bagir. (1995). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Republik Indonesia. Bandung: LPPM Universitas Islam Bandung

Jurnal

Agustine,Oly Vina. (2018). “Jurisprudence Enforceability on Judicial Review Authority in the Constitutional Court Decision”. Jurnal Konstitusi. 15 (3)

Barus, Zulfadli. (2014). “Analisis Filosofis Tentang Peta Konseptual Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Penelitian Hukum Sosiologis”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. 13 (2)

Mandasari,Zayanti. (2014). “Politik Hukum Pengaturan Masyarakat Hukum Adat (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi)”. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM. 2 (1)

Sonata,Depri Liber. (2017). ”Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum”. Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 8 (1)

Perundang-undang

Republik Indonesia. 1991. Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Lembaran Lepas,Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta

Republik Indonesia. 2009. Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaaan Kehakiman. Lembaran Negara No.157, Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta

Lain-lain

Q.S. al-‘Ankabut

Q.S. al-Nahl

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 2268 , PDF Downloads: 2284