The Constitutional Law in Contemporary Times: Comparison of India and Indonesia

Authors

  • Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Made Sugi Hartono Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Ni Putu Ega Parwati Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Sergio Salles Universidade Católica de Petrópolis, Portugal

Abstract

Constitutional law in India and Indonesia, although different in governance structure—India as a federal state and Indonesia as a unitary state—faces similar challenges in the era of globalization and technology, such as the protection of minority rights, decentralization, political stability, and adaptation to international standards, while maintaining legal sovereignty and local values. The aim of this research is to analyze the similarities and differences in the fundamental principles of constitutional law between India and Indonesia and their implementation in addressing contemporary challenges such as globalization, democracy, and human rights. This research employs a normative legal method with a legislative approach to analyze and compare the principles of constitutional law in India and Indonesia, through library research involving legal documents, academic literature, and qualitative and comparative analysis techniques to understand the application of law in the context of contemporary challenges. The study finds that although India and Indonesia have different historical and cultural backgrounds, both share fundamental principles of constitutional law such as constitutional supremacy, popular sovereignty, and the protection of human rights, but differ in their governance systems with India adopting parliamentary federalism and Indonesia a presidential unitary system. Both countries face similar challenges in globalization, democracy, and human rights, with India emphasizing the role of judicial review by the Supreme Court and Indonesia strengthening the Constitutional Court. Implementation challenges include issues of pluralism, privacy, decentralization, and responses to digitalization, with each country adjusting its legal framework to address social discrimination and freedom of expression.

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Globalization, Decentralization, Indonesia, India.

 

Author Biographies

Made Sugi Hartono, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Department of Law

Ni Putu Ega Parwati, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Department of Law

References

Aditya, Z. F., & Al-Fatih, S. (2021). Legal Protection of Indigenous People’s Rights Through Strengthening the Licensing Principles Based on Social Sensitivity. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 6(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i1.44671

Ahmad, A., Suciani Putri, V., & Muhtar, M. H. (2024). Antara Otoritas dan Otonomi : Pertautan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Praktik Eksekusi Putusan PTUN. Jurnal Konstitusi, 21(3), 392–412. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2133

Anggen Suari, K. R., & Sarjana, I. M. (2023). Menjaga Privasi di Era Digital: Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 6(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v6i1.4484

Aspinall, E., White, S., & Savirani, A. (2021). Women’s Political Representation in Indonesia: Who Wins and How? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103421989720

Babbar, M., Agrawal, S., Hossain, D., & Husain, M. M. (2023). Adoption of digital technologies amidst COVID-19 and privacy breach in India and Bangladesh. Policy Design and Practice, 6(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2162255

Budiana, M. (2024). The Influence of Multinational Corporations on Global Political Decisions. Journal of Student Collaboration Research, 1(3).

Dian, D. H., Muhadi, M., Muda, I., & Zildjianda, R. (2023). COMPARISON OF GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS BETWEEN MALAYSIAN AND INDONESIAN. PRANATA HUKUM, 18(1), 90–126. https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v18i1.301

Durin, R. (2015). Dinamika Ketatanegaraan dan Konstitusi Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Kiat, 26(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25299/kiat.2015.vol25(2).3028

Fathurrahman, M. A., & Husna, L. (2023). PERBANDINGAN HUKUM INDONESIA DAN INDIA TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ARBITRASE SECARA ONLINE. Unes Law Review, 5(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.758

Firdaus, A., Suhaidi, Sunarmi, & Leviza, J. (2023). Pancasila Ideology in Challenges of Globalization on Mineral and Coal Law in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(11), e1148. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1148

Gilbert, J., & Keane, D. (2016). Equality versus fraternity? Rethinking France and its minorities. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14(4), 883–905. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow059

Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Decentralization and Democracy in Indonesia: A Critique of Neo‐Institutionalist Perspectives. Development and Change, 35(4), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2004.00376.x

Haryanto, T., Suhardjana, J., A. Komari, A. K., Fauzan, M., & Wardaya, M. K. (2013). PENGATURAN TENTANG HAK ASASI MANUSIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945 SEBELUM DAN SETELAH AMANDEMEN. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2008.8.2.54

Huda, M., & Yunas, N. (2016). The Development of e-Government System in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 08(01), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.21787/JBP.08.2016.97-108

Indrastuti, L. (2015). MEMAHAMI HUKUM TATA NEGARA DAN PERKEMBANGAN KETATANEGARAAN DI INDONESIA. Kreasi Total Media.

Ismail, & Hartati, S. (2020). PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN (Konsep Dasar Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara di Indonesia). CV. Penerbit Qiara Media.

Jain, D. (2023). Regulation of Digital Healthcare in India: Ethical and Legal Challenges. Healthcare, 11(6), 911. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060911

Kaufman, R. R., Kelemen, R. D., & Kolcak, B. (2024). Federalism and Democratic Backsliding in Comparative Perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592724000604

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi (13th ed.). KENCANA.

Mate, M. (2010). Two Paths to Judicial Power: The Basic Structure Doctrine and Public Interest Litigation in Comparative Perspective. 12 San Diego International Law Journal 175.

Mate, M. (2016). Globalization, Rights, and Judicial Review in the Supreme Court of India. Washington International Law Journal, 25(3).

Mendy, O. (2024). Regional Autonomy in Indonesia after the Second Constitutional Amendment: Assessing its Developmental Delivery. Constitutionale, 5(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v5i1.3279

Mosse, D. (2018). Caste and development: Contemporary perspectives on a structure of discrimination and advantage. World Development, 110, 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.003

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.

Mulyawan, R. (2015). Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia. Unpad Press.

Parasher, T. (2022). Federalism, Representation, and Direct Democracy in 1920s India. Modern Intellectual History, 19(2), 444–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244320000578

Pertiwi, P., Pertiwi, P., Sakdiyah, F., & Rian, F. A. (2025). Implementasi Hukum Adat dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan: Studi Etnografis di Kawasan Hutan Adat. Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(4), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v2i4.2231

Putra, M. A. (2016). EKSISTENSI LEMBAGA NEGARA DALAM PENEGAKAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DI INDONESIA. FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v9no3.600

Riyadi, H. (2024). Unraveling the Implications of Globalization and Technology on the Political System in Global Challenges to Constitutional Law. Legal Brief: Law Science and Field, 13(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i2.999

Riyah, J. (2024). Position and Authority of the Constitutional Court as a State Institution. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 3(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v3i2.52

Ruhijat, T. R., Roejito, Kapopang, H., Imran, Hidayati, F. R., Susanto, A., Hapsari, R. D. C., Priskilla, Yulianita, Y., Darmawan, W. N., Sanjaya, H., Putra, W. E., & Wahyudi, A. (2019). Bunga Rampai: Memperkuat Peradaban Hukum dan Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.

Satrio, N. Y. (2022). PERBEDAAN KONSTITUSI NEGARA INDONESIA DAN INDIA DITINJAU DARIPROSEDUR PERUBAHAN KONSTITUSI, BENTUK NEGARA DAN SISTEMPEMERINTAHAN. Universitas Batik Islam Surakarta.

Septiana Rizco Nurfaizi. (2020). KEPALA NEGARA DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH ISLAM. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 18(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v18i2.1409

Setyorini, F. A., & Mukti, T. A. (2020). The Revocation of Kashmir’s Special Status by Narendra Modi Administration in 2019. Nation State: Journal of International Studies, 3(2), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.24076/NSJIS.2020v3i2.233

Sharma, S. D. (2002). Politics and Governance in Contemporary India: The Paradox of Democratic Deepening. Journal of International and Area Studies, 9(1).

Singh, A. (2024). Hindu–Muslim Conflict in India: Causes, Consequences & Resolution. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 7(10). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v7i10.2273

Sonwani, P. (2016). Distribution of Legislative Powers under the Indian Constitution. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-5828.2016.00009.7

Subiyanto, A. E. (2020). Pemilihan Umum Serentak yang Berintegritas sebagai Pembaruan Demokrasi Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(2), 355. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1726

Sugandi, R., Hakim, L., & Erasiah, E. (2024). A Region of Endless Dispute: An Analysis of Conflict Theory by Lewis A. Coser in the Context of Islam in Kashmir. JUSPI (Jurnal Sejarah Peradaban Islam), 7(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.30829/juspi.v7i2.17728

Sunarso, S. (2024). Exploration Of Regional Autonomy Law And Indonesian Special Autonomy. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Social Sciences and Law (ICSSL 2024), 877, 132–143. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-303-0

Suriadi, H., Magriasti, L., & Frinaldi, A. (2023). Sejarah Perkembangan Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Ilmu, 2(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31869/jmi.v2i2.4974

Suryanto, D., Riyanto, S., & Arifudin. (2024). Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi Dalam Industri Ritel Tinjauan Terhadap Kepatuhan Dan Dampaknya Pada Konsumen. Veritas: Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum, 10(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v10i1.3711

Thio, L. -a. (2010). Soft constitutional law in nonliberal Asian constitutional democracies. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8(4), 766–799. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor001

Triningsih, A. (2016). Politik Hukum Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Penyelenggaraan Negara. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1316

Variath, A. A. (2018). Article 13 and Pro Tanto Supremacy of the constitution of India. International Journal of Law, 4(3).

Warnis, W., Kustini, K., Zuhrah, F., Farida, A., & Atieqoh, S. (2024). The struggle for the construction of places of worship of minority religions in Indonesia. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 80(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v80i1.9186

Waughray, A. (2005). Human rights in South Asia: Abuse and degradation. In Asian Yearbook of International Law, Volume 10 (2001-2002) (pp. 25–55). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047408253_003

Yimenu, B. (2023). Federalism and State Restructuring in Africa: A Comparative Analysis of Origins, Rationales, and Challenges. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 54(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjad015

Yunus, N. R., Siagian, A., & Zein, F. (2022). Constitutional Law System in Indonesia and Its Comparison with Other Legal Systems. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 9(6), 1837–1858. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i6.28113

Zaenury, A. G., Rahmatiar, Y., & Abas, M. (2023). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN HUKUM DALAM SISTEM PEMILIHAN ANGGOTA PERWAKILAN RAKYAT ANTARA DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA DENGAN RAJYA SABHA REPUBLIK INDIA. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 6(2), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v6i2.1073

Zahoor, N., Wu, J., Khan, H., & Khan, Z. (2023). De-globalization, International Trade Protectionism, and the Reconfigurations of Global Value Chains. Management International Review, 63(5), 823–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-023-00522-4

Zartner, D. (2014). Mixed Legal Traditions. In Courts, Codes, and Custom (pp. 168–210). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199362103.003.0006

Downloads

Published

2025-03-28
Abstract views: 0 , PDF Downloads: 0