Analysis Of Comparative Cost Efficiency Of Conventional And Semi System Formwork Methods In Wall Buildings (Case Study: Bank Indonesia Gresik Area Project)
Analisis Perbandingan Efisiensi Biaya Bekisting Metode Konvensional Dan Semi Sistem Pada Bangunan Dinding (Studi Kasus: Proyek Kawasan Bank Indonesia Gresik)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/proteksi.v7n1.p59-66Keywords:
formwork, cost efficiency, time efficiency, conventional method, semi system method.Abstract
The Bank Indonesia Gresik project, especially in the Khazanah area, has high formwork requirements for the wall elements. Payment to subcontractors is made without down payment and using a 45-day term system after invoice and work progress. The purpose of this study is to compare the cost and time efficiency between conventional and semi-system formwork methods. The research method used is the comparative method, with cost and time analysis on 11,736.48 m² of wall work. Conventional formwork uses materials such as plywood and meranti wood, while the semi-system method uses hollow and phenolic frames. The results showed that the cost of the conventional method was IDR 2,438,396,000, while the semi-system method was only IDR 1,425,760,695. In terms of time, the conventional method takes 187 days, while the semi-system method only takes 131 days. The semi-system method provides time efficiency of 29.95% and cost efficiency of up to 41.53%. In conclusion, the semi-system formwork method is more efficient in terms of cost and time than the conventional method, so it is more feasible to apply to the wall formwork work of the Bank Indonesia Gresik Area Project.
References
Aek, P., & Setya Wijaya, H. (2019). Analisa Perbandingan Penggunaan Bekisting Konvensional dengan Pra Cetak pada Pekerjaan Kolom Apartemen Begawan Malang. 2, 24. https://pro.unitri.ac.id/index.php/sentikuin
Hidayat, T., Fitrianingrum, L., Hudiwasono, K., Perencanaan, B., Pengembangan, D., & Bandung, K. (n.d.). Penerapan Prinsip Efektif dan Efisien dalam Pelaksanaan Monitoring Kegiatan Penelitian.
Ilham, M., & Herzanita, A. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Bekisting Konvensional Dengan Bekisting Aluminium Ditinjau Dari Aspek Biaya Dan Waktu Pelaksanaan. Jurnal ARTESIS, 1(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.35814/ARTESIS.V1I1.2704
Ilham, M., & Herzanita1, A. (2021). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN BEKISTING KONVENSIONAL DENGAN BEKISTING ALUMINIUM DITINJAU DARI ASPEK BIAYA DAN WAKTU PELAKSANAAN Studi Kasus Pada Proyek Pembangunan The Lana Apartment-Tangerang (Comparative Analysis The Implementation Of Conventional And Aluminium Formwork At Cost And Time Aspects). In Jurnal Artesis (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Maskur, A., Fuadi, I., & Sukmara, E. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Dan Waktu Antara Bekisting Kayu Multiplek Dengan Bekisting Bondek Untuk Plat Lantai. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Infomasi Terapan, 9(2), undefined-undefined. https://doi.org/10.33197/JITTER.VOL9.ISS2.2023.1023
Maskur, A., Fuadi, I., Sukmara, E., Teknologi, J. I., & Terapan, I. (2023). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN BIAYA DAN WAKTU ANTARA BEKISTING KAYU MULTIPLEK DENGAN BEKISTING BONDEK UNTUK PLAT LANTAI.
Maulana Zakariyyah, M., & Gita Prafitasiwi, A. (2024). Analisa Perbandingan Pemasangan Bekisting Konvensional dengan Bekisting Alumunium pada Pekerjaan Struktur Gedung Sekolah Comparative Analysis of Conventional Formwork and Aluminium Formwork in Structural Work of High School Building Construction Project. In Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan (Vol. 01, Issue 1). http://ejournal.ft.umg.ac.id/index.php/jtk
Rahadianto, D., Perwitasari, D., & Mashur, A. R. H. (2022). ANALISA PERBANDINGAN PENGGUNAAN BEKISTING ALUMINIUM, BEKISTING KONVENSIONAL, SEMI KONVENSIONAL DAN SISTEM (PERI). CIVED, 9(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.24036/CIVED.V9I2.113909
Rahadianto, D., Sari, D. P., Rahmat, A., & Mashur, H. (2022). ANALISA PERBANDINGAN PENGGUNAAN BEKISTING ALUMINIUM, BEKISTING KONVENSIONAL, SEMI KONVENSIONAL DAN SISTEM (PERI) (Vol. 9, Issue 2). http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/cived/index
Rahardianto, D., Perwitasari, D., & Mashur, A. R. H. (2022). Analisa Perbandingan Penggunaan Bekisting Aluminium, Bekisting Konvensional, Semi Konvensional Dan Sistem (PERI). CIVED, 9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/cived.v9i2.113909
Wibowo, M. A., D, J. U., & Yinurullah, S. (2023). Perbandingan Penggunaan Variasi Tipe Bekisting Ditinjau dari Sisi Biaya, Mutu, Waktu dan Waste pada Pelaksanaan Konstruksi Gedung Bertingkat di Indonesia. Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(11), 6596–6609. https://doi.org/10.36418/SYNTAX-LITERATE.V6I6
Zakariyyah, M. M., & Prafitasiwi, A. G. (2024). Analisa Perbandingan Pemasangan Bekisting Konvensional dengan Bekisting Alumunium pada Pekerjaan Struktur Gedung Sekolah. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Dan Lingkungan, 1(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.30587/JTSL.V1I1.7407
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JENNY SEPTYA DAMAI NAVIDA, Maulidya Octaviani B, ST.,M.MT, Wisnu Abiarto N, ST., M.MT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 11
,
PDF Downloads: 6
