IMPLEMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD (STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN TINGKAT KEAKTIFAN DAN PRESTASI BELAJAR MATA PELAJARAN SEJARAH

Authors

  • Irwan Abbas Universitas Jember
  • Mohamad Naim Universitas Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/metafora.v1n4.p154-169

Keywords:

Cooperative, STAD, liveliness, Achievement

Abstract

The aims to be achieved in this research are, first, to assess whether the application of cooperative learning type STAD can increase the rate of liveliness learn on the subjects of history. Second,  to assessing whether the application of cooperative learning type STAD able to increase learning achievements on the subjects of history. The design of this study was with the Control Group Pre-Test and Post Test design. The results of the analysis of the data can be inferred: 1 ) the application of type STAD of cooperative learning can increase the rate of liveliness to study for students on the subjects of history,  koofesien relative effectiveness of 7,69 %. So if a student receives a grade activeness 66 in a conventional classroom, the liveliness of students in the classroom with using the cooperative learning type STAD methods will rise to 66 + ( 7,69 % x 66 ) that is equal to  71,07;  2 ) the application of learning cooperative type STAD able to increase learning achievements on the subjects of history, koofesien relative effectiveness of 7.4 %. So if a student gets the value of 66 in the class conventional, the classroom using cooperative learning type STAD  will increase to 66 + (7.04% x 66) that is equal to 70.65.

References

Arends, Richard I. (2007). Learning To Teach. New York: McGraw Hill Companies

Arends, Richard I. (2007). Classroom Instruction and Management. New York: McGraw Hill Companies

Arikunto,S. (2007). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Tabrani Rusyan. (1992). Pendekatan Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung : Remaja Karya.

Djamarah, S.B. dan Zain, A. (2002). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Engkoswara. 1988. Dasar-dasar Metodologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Hariyono. 1995. Mempelajari Sejarah Secara Efektif. Malang: Pustaka Jaya.


Halik , M. (2009). Pembelajaran Kooperatif untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran: Skripsi. Jember: UNEJ

Ibrahim, M., et all. (2000).Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya: UNESA

Martinis, Y. (2008). Paradigma Pendidikan Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: GP. Press.

Nur, M dan Wikandari, PR.(2000) Pengajaran Berpusat Pada Siswa dan pendekatan Konstruktivistik. Surabaya: PSMS PPS Unesa

Nugroho.(2005). Strategi Jitu Memilih Metode Statistik Penelitian dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Sudjana, N. 1990. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Slavin, R.(2003). Cooperatif Learning. New York: Longman.

Soewarso. (2000). Cara-cara Penyampaian Pendidikan Untuk membangkitkan Minat Peserta Didik Mempelajari Sejarah Bangsanya. Jakarta: Depdiknas

Sudirman, N. (1991). Ilmu Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Sudjono. (1989). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Biru.

Suranto. (2002). Pembelajaran Sejarah Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Intelektual. Jember: Unej.

Trianto. (1997). Model Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publiser.

Widja, I.G., (2002), Menuju Wajah Baru Pendidikan Sejarah, Yogyakarta, Lappera Pustaka Utama.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-02
Abstract views: 152 , PDF Downloads: 311