Peer Review Process

Metafora : Education, Social Sciences and Humanities Journal maintain the standards of peer review while increasing the time-efficiency of the process.

The initial review process is at least 6 weeks.

All research articles oublished in Metafora : Education, Social Sciences and Humanities Journal undergo full peer review with characteristics of which are listed:

1. All articles are reviewed by at least two qualified experts.

2. Publication decisions are made by the Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided.

3. Editoral Member and Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows Metafora : Education, Social Sciences and Humanities Journal to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering efficiency to authors, reviewers and editors alike.

Peer review of referred papers:

Editor in Chief of Metafora : Education, Social Sciences and Humanities Journal will decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions of referred papers based on the reviews and editorial insight of the supporting journals.

In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. Authors will be advised when Editors decide further review is needed.

Peer review of novel submissions:

Articles submitted to Metafora : Education, Social Sciences and Humanities Journal will be peer reviewed by two qualified experts in the field selected by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief will then decide whether to accept, reject or request revisions based on the reviews and comments received.

Editorial Member will decide whether each submission reports well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. Assessments of priority will not be a factor in decision-making, but all papers must make an incremental or novel addition to the literature.