Profil Kesadaran Metakognisi Mahasiswa di Universitas Trunojoyo Madura pada Program Studi Pendidikan IPA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jppms.v5n2.p84-91Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis keterampilan metakognitif peserta didik Program Studi IPA, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode survei. Populasi penelitian merupakan seluruh peserta didik aktif Angkatan 2021− 2018 Program Studi Pendidikan IPA yang berjumlah 463 peserta didik. Digunakan stratified propotional random sampling sebagai teknik sampling, jumlah sampel tersebar tiap angkatan dengan total sebanyak 186 peserta didik. MAI (Metacognitive Awarness Inventory) merupakan cara untuk mengukur kesadaran metakognisi, yang meliputi pengetahuan kognisi dan regulasi kognisi. Subindikator pengetahuan kognisi pengetahuan deklaratif, prosedural, dan kondisional, kemudian subindikator perencanaan, strategi manajemen informasi, monitoring pemahaman, strategi prediksi serta evaluasi sebagai subindikator regulasi kognisi. Analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif kuantitatif penelitian menunjukan 70,13% peserta didik memiliki kesadaran metakognisi dengan kategori baik. Indikator pengetahuan kognisi peserta didik dalam kategori baik dengan presentase 70,06%, pada subindikator pengetahuan deklaratif kategori baik dengan presentase 70,05%, pengetahuan proseduraal 69,50% termasuk kategori baik, pengetahuan kondisional 70,64% kategori baik. Indikator regulasi kognisi peserta didik menunjukan presentase 70,17% termasuk dalam kategori baik, dengan subindikator perencanaan 70,80%, strategi manajemen informasi 65,03%, monitoring pemahaman 71,29%, strategi prediksi 73,64% serta evaluasi sebesar 70,08% dengan kategori baik pada tiap
sub indikator.
Kata kunci: keterampilan metakognisi, pengetahuan metakognisi, regulasi metakognisi, Metacognitive, Awarness Inventory
The purpose of this study is to analyze the metacognitive skills of students of the Science Study Program, Trunojoyo University, Madura using a survey method. The research population is all active students of the 2021−2018 Science Education Study Program, totaling 463 students. Stratified proportional random sampling as a sampling technique, the number of samples is spread over each batch with a total of 186 students. Schraw and Dennison (1994) developed the MAI (Metacognitive Awareness Inventory) which can be used to measure metacognitive awareness, which includes knowledge of cognition and regulation of cognition. Cognitive knowledge sub-indicators declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge, then planning, information management strategies, understanding monitoring, prediction strategies, and evaluation as cognition regulation sub-indicators. Data analysis using quantitative descriptive analysis showed that 70.13% of students had a good category. The indicator of cognitive knowledge with good category with a percentage of 70.06%, declarative knowledge good category with percentage 70.05%, procedural knowledge 69.50% is good category, conditional knowledge 70.64% with good category. The indicator of student cognition regulation shows a percentage of 70.17% included with good category, with planning 70.80%, information management strategy 65.03%, monitoring understanding 71.29%, predictive strategy 73.64%, and evaluation 70.08 % with good category in each sub-indicator.
Keywords: metacognitive skills, metacognitive knowledge, regulation of metacognition, Metacognitive, Awareness Inventory
References
Arahmat, Y. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah (Problem Based Learning) Dengan Teknik Mind Mapping Terhadap Metakognisi dan Hasil Belajar Biologi. Skripsi.
Barida, M. (2017). Keterampilan Metakognisi Peserta didik Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan & Konseling, 3(2), pp. 46–54.
Batdal Karaduman, G. and Erbaş, A. A. (2017). Investigation of Primary School Teacher Candidates’ Metacognitive Awareness Level. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 5(4), pp. 31–48. doi: 10.17478/JEGYS.2017.68.
Chauhan, A. and Singh, N. (2014). Metacognition: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 3(3), pp. 21–22.
Darling-Hammond, L. et al. (2020). Implications for Educational Practice of the Science of Learning and Development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), pp. 97–140. doi: 10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.
Demirel, M., Aşkın, İ. and Yağcı, E. (2015). An Investigation of Teacher Candidates’ Metacognitive Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 174, pp. 1521–1528. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.783.
Docherty, M. (2018). Teaching the Next Generation: Engaging and Empowering the Learners of Tomorrow. INTED2018 Proceedings, pp. 1030–1039. doi: 10.21125/inted.2018.0121.
Efklides, A. (2014). How Does Metacognition Contribute to the Regulation of Learning ? An Integrative Approach. pp. 1–30.
Fauzi, A. and Sa’diyah, W. (2019). The Metacognition of Pre-Service Biology Teachers: Awareness, Skills, Understanding, and Practices. Atlantis Press, 349 (Iccd), pp. 27–32. doi: 10.2991/iccd-19.2019.8.
Flavell, J. H. (1971). What Is Memory Development the Development of? Theoretical Aspects of Memory, 148, pp. 89–139. doi: 10.4324/9780203978108-11.
Iskandar, S. M. (2014). Pendekatan Keterampilan Metakognitif Dalam Pembelajaran Sains di Kelas. Erudio Journal of Educational Innovation, 2(2), pp. 13–20. doi: 10.18551/erudio.2-2.3.
Jia, X. (2019). The Role of Metacognitive Components in Creative Thinking. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02404.
Louca, E. (2003). The Concept and Instruction of Metacognition. Teacher Development. 7(1), pp. 9–30. doi: 10.1080/13664530300200184.
Lukitasari, M., Hasan, R. and Murtafiah, W. (2019). Using Critical Analysis to Develop Metacognitive Ability and Critical Thinking Skills in Biology. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), pp. 151–158. doi: 10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7262.
Maswandi, F. (2015) .Analisis Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa Berasrama terhadap Materi Ekosistem The Analysis of Metacognitive Ability of Boarding School Students Towards the Subject on Ecosystem. Seminar Nasional XII Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS 2015, pp. 309–316.
Maulyda, M. A. (2020). Level Berpikir Metakognisi Peserta Didik Selama Perkuliahan Online di Masa Pandemi. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 3(6), pp. 679–690. doi: 10.22460/jpmi.v3i6.679-690.
Panggayuh, V. (2017). Pengaruh Kemampuan Metakognitif Terhadap Prestasi Akademik Peserta Didik pada Mata Kuliah Pemrograman Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika, 02, pp. 20–25.
Persky, A. M., Medina, M. S. and Castleberry, A. N. (2019). Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Pharmacy Students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(2), pp. 161–170. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7033.
Setyadi, D. (2018). Proses Metakognisi Peserta didik Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika (Studi Kasus Pada Peserta didik Pendidikan Matematika UKSW). 9(1), pp. 93–99.
Shofiyah, N. (2018). Model Problem Based Learning ( PBL ) Dalam Melatih Scientific Reasoning Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pandidikan IPA. 3(1), pp. 33–38.
Siagian, M. V., Saragih, S. and Sinaga, B. (2019). Development of Learning Materials Oriented on Problem-Based Learning Model to Improve Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Metacognition Ability. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), pp. 331–340. doi: 10.29333/iejme/5717.
Siregar, I. Y., Susilo, H. and Suwono, H. (2017). The Effect of Think-Pair-Share-Write Based on Hybrid Learning on Metakognitive Skills, Creative Thinking and Cognitive Learning at SMA Negeri 3 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 3(2), p. 183. doi: 10.22219/jpbi.v3i2.4217.
Sudarmin et al. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Etnosains (MPSBE) Untuk Menanamkan Nilai Karakter Konservasi dan Literasi Sains. Semarang: Unnes Press.
Yanqun, Z. (2019). The Significance and Instruction of Metacognition in Continuing Education. International Forum of Teaching & Studies. 15(1), pp. 29–37.
Yudha, C. B. (2019). Penerapan Project Based Learning dalam Mata Kuliah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Dwija Cendekia, 3(1), pp. 30–42.
Abstract views: 163
,
PDF Downloads: 541
