PEER REVIEW POLICIES

The author(s) may suggest a maximum of 15 potential reviewers to review their paper (please include the following information, e.g., title, name, institution, postage address, and email address). Authors can also propose that unwanted individuals/reviewers not to review their article (maximum 5 researchers with a reasonable explanation). Reviewers must have the Scopus-ID or Researcher-ID (Thomson Reuters) or recorded as a first author in this journal with (minimum) a doctoral degree.

Reviewers may also be invited from journals published by major publishers such as Elsevier or Springer. They must, however, come from different institutions with authors; preferably originating from different countries. Reviewers must not be subject to a conflict of interest involving the author(s) or manuscript(s). Nevertheless, the editor is not obligated to use any reviewers suggested by the author(s).

All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Emerging Technologies in Ethnomathematics (JETiE) will be read and reviewed blindly (double blind peer review) by a minimum of 2 peer reviewers who are experts in their field. Manuscript Service Flow can be seen on this page. The Editor may assign the Reviewer(s) from the Journal of Emerging Technologies in Ethnomathematics (JETiE) peer reviewers, the Author(s)’ suggestions, other researchers, and/or other Journal of Emerging Technologies in Ethnomathematics (JETiE) Editorial Board Members. The acceptance of manuscripts depends on the novelty of the research, the significance of the article, the truth of the content, the degree of originality, the clarity of description, and the conformity with the objective of the journal.

Manuscript may be accepted without revision, with minor revisions, major revisions, or even rejected. The final decision of manuscript acceptance shall be made by the Editorial Board according to reviewers’ critical comments. The results of the reviewed articles by reviewers will be notified by the author via email. The author is allowed to revise their article based on the reviewers' (and editors’) suggestions no later than 4 weeks after the email notification.