Publication Ethics
This journal's publication ethics refers to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
The statement of the scientific publication code of ethics is a statement of ethics by all parties involved in the scientific journal publication process, namely managers, editors, peer reviewers, and authors. The statement of the scientific publication code of ethics is stipulated by the Head of LIPI Regulation No. 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications. The Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications essentially upholds three ethical values in publications:
Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in managing publications;
Fairness, which grants authorship rights to those entitled to be authors; and
Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.
ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR EDITORS
1. Publication Decisions
The editor of the Journal of Islamic Economics and Business is responsible for deciding which articles to accept for publication. This decision is based on the validation of the article and its contribution to researchers and readers. In doing so, the editor is guided by the policies of the editorial board and subject to applicable laws regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may consult with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
2. Purpose of Evaluation
Editors evaluate manuscripts based on their intellectual content without discrimination based on religion, ethnicity, race, gender, or other factors.
3. Confidentiality
The editor and editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the author, reviewers, potential reviewers, and the editorial board.
4. Conflict of Interest
Submitted manuscripts must not be used for the editor's personal advantage without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through double-blind review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors must decline to review manuscripts if they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
5. Cooperation in Investigations
Editors must take responsive steps if there are ethical complaints about accepted manuscripts or published articles. Editors can contact the authors and consider the complaint. Editors can also communicate further with the institutions or agencies involved in the research. Once the complaint has been resolved, actions such as publication corrections, retractions, or other notes should be considered.
ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR REVIEWERS
1. Contributions to the Editor's Decision
Blind peer review by reviewers assists the editor in making decisions and can assist the author in improving the paper through communication between the reviewer and the author. Peer review is an essential component of formal scientific communication and the scientific approach.
2. Punctuality
If an assigned reviewer feels unqualified to review a manuscript or is unable to complete the review in a timely manner, the assigned reviewer should promptly notify the editor.
3. Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review are confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
4. Objective
Reviews must be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable. Reviewers should express their opinions clearly and provide supporting arguments.
5. Completeness and Originality of References
Reviewers should identify any sources that have not been cited by the authors. Any statements/arguments made should be accompanied by relevant citations. Reviewers should notify the editor of any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under review and any other published work of which they have personal knowledge.
6. Conflict of Interest
Unpublished manuscripts may not be used for a reviewer's personal research without the written permission of the author. Information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should refuse to accept manuscripts for review if they have a conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the work.
ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR AUTHORS
1. Writing Standards
Authors should present the discussion and significance of the research in the manuscript. Research data should be presented accurately. The paper should be sufficiently detailed and adequately referenced to permit others to replicate the work. Articles containing inaccurate data constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
2. Access to Research Data
Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in the form of a paper for review and should be willing to provide public access to such data, if possible, and should be willing to retain data for a reasonable period after publication.
3. Originality and Plagiarism
Plagiarism in any form is unethical behavior in scholarly publication and is unacceptable. Authors must ensure that all work is original, and if the author has quoted the work and/or words of others, the author must provide appropriate citations. There are various forms of plagiarism, such as claiming another person's writing as their own, copying or rewriting substantial portions of another person's work without citing the source, and claiming research results conducted by others. Self-plagiarism, or auto-plagiarism, is a form of plagiarism. Auto-plagiarism is quoting or using sentences from one's own previously published work without citing the source.
4. Article Submission Requirements
Authors should not publish the same manuscript in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
5. Reference Sources
Authors must cite the sources of each article cited in the manuscript. Information obtained privately, such as through conversations, correspondence, or discussions with third parties, must not be used or reported without the written permission of the source.
6. Authorship
Authors are individuals who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the article. All parties who have made significant contributions to the writing of the article are listed as co-authors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors are included in the manuscript, that all co-authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript, and that they have agreed to its submission for publication.
7. Errors in Publication
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's responsibility to notify the journal editor and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor receives information from a third party that a work contains a significant error in publication, the author is responsible for promptly retracting or correcting the work to the editor or providing evidence of the originality of the work.
