Supporting Primary School Teachers in Developing English-Medium Science Materials Using Generative AI

Authors

  • Retno Wulan Dari Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Eva Rahmawati Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Suvi Akhiriyah Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Wiwiet Eva Savitri Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Himmawan Adi Nugroho Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Rizki Ramadhan Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Keywords:

Generative AI, Teacher Professional Development, English-Medium Instruction, Teaching Material Development

Abstract

Developing English-medium Science materials for primary school students requires careful attention to language accessibility and subject accuracy. At primary school Labschool UNESA 2 Surabaya, initial coordination, teacher surveys, interviews, and reviews of existing materials highlighted the need to adapt Grade 3 Science texts to students’ language proficiency. A community engagement program was therefore conducted to support teachers in this process. Twelve teachers attended two face-to-face sessions on 21 November and 2 December 2025. Working in three groups, they used ChatGPT and MagicSchool.ai to revise three Science chapters, followed by readability checks and facilitator feedback. Changes were assessed using Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, and estimated CEFR levels. A post-program questionnaire gathered participants’ feedback. The revised texts showed improved readability. Average Flesch Reading Ease scores increased from 60.7 to 74.3, while Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores decreased from 8.7 to 5.5. Estimated CEFR levels shifted from B1+–B2 toward A2–B1 or B1. Teachers also produced revised reading texts, vocabulary sections, worksheets, and reusable prompts. Survey results showed that 83% rated their understanding of prompting as good, while 92% evaluated the program positively. However, neither student comprehension nor improvement in individual teacher competence was directly measured. Classroom testing is needed to assess the materials’ effectiveness.

Author Biographies

Eva Rahmawati, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

-

Suvi Akhiriyah, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

-

Wiwiet Eva Savitri, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

-

Himmawan Adi Nugroho, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

-

Rizki Ramadhan, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

-

References

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2024). The educational affordances and challenges of ChatGPT: State of the field. TechTrends, 68, 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00939-0

Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment - Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/cefr-companion-volume-and-its-language-versions

Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532

Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Jr., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel (Research Branch Report 8-75). Chief of Naval Technical Training. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/istlibrary/56/

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the implementation of ChatGPT in education: A systematic review. Computers, 12(8), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153

Ngoasong, M. Z. (2022). Curriculum adaptation for blended learning in resource-scarce contexts. Journal of Management Education, 46(4), 622-655. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629211047168

Rahayu, G. R., Utomo, P. S., Riskiyana, R., & Hidayah, R. N. (2022). Opportunity amid crisis in medical education: Teaching during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 15, 2493-2502. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S379140

Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 593-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Thalmann, S. (2014). Adaptation criteria for the personalised delivery of learning materials: A multi-stage empirical investigation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.235

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Downloads

Published

2026-11-12

How to Cite

Dari, R. W., Rahmawati, E., Akhiriyah, S., Savitri, W. E., Nugroho, H. A., & Ramadhan, R. (2026). Supporting Primary School Teachers in Developing English-Medium Science Materials Using Generative AI. ABISATYA : Journal of Community Engagement, 4(1), 65–75. Retrieved from https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/abisatya/article/view/58125
Abstract views: 1 , PDF Downloads: 1