Supporting Primary School Teachers in Developing English-Medium Science Materials Using Generative AI
Keywords:
Generative AI, Teacher Professional Development, English-Medium Instruction, Teaching Material DevelopmentAbstract
Developing English-medium Science materials for primary school students requires careful attention to language accessibility and subject accuracy. At primary school Labschool UNESA 2 Surabaya, initial coordination, teacher surveys, interviews, and reviews of existing materials highlighted the need to adapt Grade 3 Science texts to students’ language proficiency. A community engagement program was therefore conducted to support teachers in this process. Twelve teachers attended two face-to-face sessions on 21 November and 2 December 2025. Working in three groups, they used ChatGPT and MagicSchool.ai to revise three Science chapters, followed by readability checks and facilitator feedback. Changes were assessed using Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, and estimated CEFR levels. A post-program questionnaire gathered participants’ feedback. The revised texts showed improved readability. Average Flesch Reading Ease scores increased from 60.7 to 74.3, while Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores decreased from 8.7 to 5.5. Estimated CEFR levels shifted from B1+–B2 toward A2–B1 or B1. Teachers also produced revised reading texts, vocabulary sections, worksheets, and reusable prompts. Survey results showed that 83% rated their understanding of prompting as good, while 92% evaluated the program positively. However, neither student comprehension nor improvement in individual teacher competence was directly measured. Classroom testing is needed to assess the materials’ effectiveness.References
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2024). The educational affordances and challenges of ChatGPT: State of the field. TechTrends, 68, 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00939-0
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment - Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/cefr-companion-volume-and-its-language-versions
Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532
Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Jr., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel (Research Branch Report 8-75). Chief of Naval Technical Training. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/istlibrary/56/
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the implementation of ChatGPT in education: A systematic review. Computers, 12(8), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153
Ngoasong, M. Z. (2022). Curriculum adaptation for blended learning in resource-scarce contexts. Journal of Management Education, 46(4), 622-655. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629211047168
Rahayu, G. R., Utomo, P. S., Riskiyana, R., & Hidayah, R. N. (2022). Opportunity amid crisis in medical education: Teaching during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 15, 2493-2502. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S379140
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 593-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Thalmann, S. (2014). Adaptation criteria for the personalised delivery of learning materials: A multi-stage empirical investigation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.235
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ABISATYA : Journal of Community Engagement

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in ABISATYA: Journal of Community Engagement are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License. This license permits anyone to copy, distribute, adapt, remix, and build upon the published work for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source. Any derivative works must be distributed under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
Abstract views: 1
,
PDF Downloads: 1


