Author Guidelines

Journal of Sport Medicine and Physiotherapy (JoSMPt)

The Journal of Sport Medicine and Physiotherapy (JoSMPt) welcomes high-quality manuscripts in the fields of sports medicine, physiotherapy, exercise science, rehabilitation, human performance, and related disciplines. Manuscripts must be original, scientifically rigorous, and not under consideration by another journal.

 

  1. Types of Manuscripts

JoSMPt accepts the following manuscript categories:

Original Research Article

Reports original findings from quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, experimental, observational, or clinical research.

Recommended structure:

  • Title
  • Author(s)
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments (optional)
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Author Contributions
  • Funding
  • References

 

Review Article

Systematic reviews, scoping reviews, narrative reviews, or meta-analyses.

Recommended structure:

  • Title
  • Author(s)
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Author Contributions
  • Funding
  • References

Systematic reviews should preferably follow the PRISMA Statement.

 

Case Report

Reports unusual or educational clinical cases relevant to sports medicine and physiotherapy.

Recommended structure:

  • Title
  • Author(s)
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Introduction
  • Case Description
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Author Contributions
  • Funding
  • References

Patient consent and ethical approval must be clearly stated where applicable.

 

  1. Language

All manuscripts must be written in clear and grammatically correct English.

Authors whose first language is not English are strongly encouraged to obtain professional English editing before submission.

 

  1. Manuscript Formatting

The manuscript must be prepared using the official JoSMPt template.

General formatting requirements:

  • Paper size: A4
  • Margins: As provided in the template
  • Main text font: Baskerville Old Face
  • Body text size: 12 pt
  • Line spacing: 1.5
  • Text alignment: Justified
  • Title font: Helvetica 20 pt
  • Tables and figures: 10 pt captions

Authors should not modify the predefined styles in the template.

 

  1. Title

The title should:

  • be concise and informative;
  • accurately reflect the manuscript content;
  • avoid abbreviations whenever possible;
  • use sentence case.

 

  1. Author Information

Include:

  • Full author names
  • Institutional affiliations
  • Country
  • Corresponding author
  • Email address

Each affiliation should be clearly identified.

 

  1. Abstract

The abstract should not exceed 250 words.

For Original Articles, use the following headings:

  • Background
  • Objectives
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Conclusion

For Review Articles and Case Reports, authors may adapt the abstract according to the study type while maintaining clarity.

 

  1. Keywords

Provide 3–5 keywords.

Keywords should:

  • not duplicate words already appearing in the title whenever possible;
  • follow MeSH terminology where appropriate.

 

  1. Introduction

The Introduction should explain:

  • background of the study;
  • current scientific evidence;
  • research gap;
  • novelty;
  • objectives of the study;
  • contribution to science or clinical practice.

 

  1. Methods

Methods should provide sufficient detail to enable replication.

For Original Research, include:

  • Study design
  • Participants
  • Sampling methods
  • Research instruments
  • Data collection
  • Data analysis
  • Ethical approval

For Review Articles, include:

  • Research question
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Search strategy
  • Study selection
  • Data extraction
  • Quality appraisal
  • Data synthesis
  • PRISMA flow diagram (when applicable)

For Case Reports, include:

  • Patient characteristics
  • Clinical history
  • Diagnostic assessment
  • Intervention
  • Follow-up
  • Ethical approval
  • Patient consent

 

  1. Results

Results should be presented objectively.

Use:

  • tables,
  • figures,
  • graphs,
  • photographs,

only when they improve clarity.

Do not duplicate the same data in both tables and figures.

Each table and figure must be cited in the text.

 

  1. Discussion

The Discussion should:

  • interpret the findings;
  • compare findings with previous studies;
  • explain similarities and differences;
  • discuss theoretical and clinical implications;
  • acknowledge study limitations;
  • provide recommendations for future research.

Avoid repeating numerical results.

 

  1. Conclusion

The Conclusion should:

  • directly answer the research objectives;
  • summarize the main findings;
  • avoid introducing new information.

 

  1. Tables

Tables should:

  • be editable (not images);
  • use Arabic numbering;
  • have titles above the table;
  • include explanatory notes below the table if necessary.

 

  1. Figures

Figures should:

  • have high resolution (minimum 300 dpi);
  • use Arabic numbering;
  • include captions below the figure;
  • be cited sequentially.

 

  1. Ethical Approval

Studies involving humans or animals must include:

  • name of ethics committee;
  • approval number;
  • informed consent statement (where applicable).

Research involving human participants must comply with the Declaration of Helsinki.

 

  1. Conflict of Interest

Authors must declare whether any conflicts of interest exist.

If none exist, state:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

  1. Author Contributions

Authors should specify individual contributions using the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) whenever possible.

Examples include:

  • Conceptualization
  • Methodology
  • Investigation
  • Formal Analysis
  • Writing – Original Draft
  • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Supervision

 

  1. Funding

Authors must disclose all funding sources.

If there is no funding, state:

This research received no external funding.

 

  1. References

JoSMPt uses APA 7th Edition for citations and references.

Authors are encouraged to use reference management software such as:

  • Mendeley
  • Zotero
  • EndNote

Reference requirements:

  • Minimum 25 references.
  • At least 80% should be primary research articles.
  • Preferably published within the last 10 years, unless citing seminal works.
  • Include DOI whenever available.

 

  1. Plagiarism Policy

All submissions are screened using plagiarism detection software.

Similarity Index should generally not exceed 20%, excluding references, quotations, and standard methodological descriptions.

Manuscripts with excessive similarity may be rejected without peer review.

 

  1. Submission Checklist

Before submission, authors should ensure that:

  • The manuscript follows the official JoSMPt template.
  • The manuscript is written in English.
  • The title page is complete.
  • The abstract complies with the journal format.
  • Keywords are provided.
  • Tables and figures are correctly numbered.
  • References follow APA 7th Edition.
  • Ethical approval has been stated (if applicable).
  • Conflict of Interest statement is included.
  • Author Contributions are provided.
  • Funding statement is included.
  • The manuscript has not been submitted elsewhere.