Gymnastics Education Teaching Learning: A Review of the Literature

Authors

Indrayogi Universitas Majalengka, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7715-3887
Brio Alfatihah Rama Yudha Universitas Majalengka, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9027-0770
Tatang Suryadin Universitas Majalengka, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5869-9533
Rudi Universitas Majalengka, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9480-1172

Keywords:

Gymnastics education, Physical education, Teaching learning, Pedagogy, Technology integration

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the development of teaching and learning practices in gymnastics education within physical education by identifying pedagogical approaches, technology integration, teacher competence, and implementation challenges. Unlike previous reviews focusing mainly on performance aspects, this study provides a multidimensional synthesis of pedagogical, psychological, technological, and cognitive perspectives.

Materials and Methods: This study employed a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines, including identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion stages. Data were collected from the Scopus database using structured keywords within the publication range of 2015–2025. A total of 88 records were identified, and 17 articles met the inclusion criteria for final analysis. The selected studies were analyzed thematically to classify key themes related to pedagogy, technology integration, teacher competence, psychological aspects, and learning outcomes.

Result: The findings revealed five major themes: pedagogical approaches, technology integration, teacher competence, psychological and inclusivity aspects, and physiological and cognitive impacts. Innovative methods such as Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility (TPSR) and cooperative learning improved students’ motor skills, knowledge, and social attitudes. Technology integration through Android-based media, 3D simulations, and artificial intelligence increased engagement and movement understanding. However, challenges remain, including limited teacher readiness, inadequate facilities, and students’ fear and low confidence. Gymnastics education also contributes to cognitive development, particularly critical thinking skills.

Conclusion: Gymnastics education has evolved into a multidimensional and student-centered learning process integrating pedagogy and technology to optimize physical and cognitive learning outcomes.

References

Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702

Ameen, F. M., Hanna, S. J., & Hassan, H. S. (2015). The impact of theory to study the Al-Biomechanics skill in the performance of jumping on a groundbreaking platform to jump in artistic gymnastics for students. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 10(Proc2), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2015.10.Proc2.02

Ávalos-Ramos, M. A., de Oliveira, J. A. M., Molina-García, N., & Vega-Ramírez, L. (2025). Professional Teaching Competence Perceived by Portuguese Students of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences in Gymnastic Disciplines. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081056

Cabrera, D., Cabrera, L., & Cabrera, E. (2023). The Steps to Doing a Systems Literature Review ( SLR ). April, 0–3. https://doi.org/10.54120/jost.pr000019.v1

Gallardo-fuentes, F., Carter-thuillier, B., Rivas-valenzuela, J., Cárdenas-saldaña, N., Gallardo-fuentes, J., & Añazco-martínez, L. (2025). Curricular structure and pedagogical approaches in pre-service physical education teacher education : a comparative case study of three Chilean universities. November, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1668771

Handayani, S. G., Myori, D. E., & Komaini, A. (2025). Android-based GymAp application to improve handstand skills in gymnastics learning among high school students. 14, 1–15.

Hao, S., & Zhao, L. (2024). Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences Parametric Modeling Applied to the Construction of a Competency Hierarchy Model for Teaching Early Childhood Gymnastics. 9(1), 1–18.

Khataybeh, A., Al-Shadiedh, M., & Khasawneh, G. (2024). The effectiveness of cooperative learning strategy for mastery in enhancing the skill performance of some gymnastics floor movements. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports, 28(4), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2024.0406

La, E. D. E., Alta, G. D. E., En, I., Proteínas, L. A. S., & Esqueléticas, M. (2023). Effects of High-Intensity Gymnastics on Skeletal Muscle Proteins. 29, 1–4.

Larsson, H., Barker, D., Ekberg, J. E., & Nyberg, G. (2026). Educational gymnastics as objectual practice: reflections on content knowledge. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 8989, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2026.2640558

Lopes, P., & Carbinatto, M. V. (2023). Freirean Principles in the University Extension in Gymnastics for All. Revista Brasileira de Educacao, 28, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782023280008

McVeigh, J., Maher, A. J., Thomson, A., & Knight, J. (2025). Physical education teacher education: disrupting ableism in gymnastics. Sport, Education and Society, 3322, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2025.2511987

Page, M. J., Mckenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement : an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Ren, Q., & Ma, Z. (2025). Experimental exploration of artificial intelligence and ADAMS simulation technology in the teaching of vertical hoop upward throw in rhythmic gymnastics. 3, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330844

Sepúlveda, F. M., Cerda, P. V., Martínez, L. A. A., & Elizalde, J. P. M. (2024). Learning and assessment of artistic gymnastics in physical education classes: a perspective based on students’ experiences. 2(2), 306–312.

Sojourner, E. J., Burgasser, A. J., & Weise, E. D. (2018). Let’s Get Physical: Teaching Physics Through Gymnastics. The Physics Teacher, 56(1), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5018692

Widowati, A., Decheline, G., Diana, F., Anjanika, Y., & Handayani, S. G. (2025). Enhancing critical thinking skills through rhythmic gymnastics activities. 14, 1–11.

Yang, H., Cheng, G., & Cheng, S. (2026). Advanced utilization of motion decomposition and visualization technology in gymnastics education. March. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1794257

Yuwono, C., Rahayu, T., Sulaiman, & Rustiadi, T. (2022). Increasing Students’ Gymnastic and Rhythmic Activities through Locomotor, Non-locomotor, and Manipulative Movement Patterns. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2164

Downloads

Published

2026-07-04

How to Cite

Indrayogi, Yudha, B. A. R., Suryadin, T., & Rudi. (2026). Gymnastics Education Teaching Learning: A Review of the Literature. JSES : Journal of Sport and Exercise Science, 9(1). Retrieved from https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jses/article/view/53499