Penyerahan Naskah

Perlu Login atau Daftar untuk menyerahkan naskah.

Daftar Tilik Penyerahan Naskah

Penulis yang ingin memasukkan naskah harus memperhatikan poin-poin di bawah ini. Jika naskah tidak sesuai dengan persyaratan yang telah dicantumkan, ada kemungkinan naskah tersebut akan dikembalikan.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Panduan Penulis

GENERAL GUIDELINES AND LAYOUTS

The manuscript is an original manuscript (never published elsewhere) which is sourced from research results, literature reviews and other scientific reviews. JSDG (Journal of Social Dynamics and Governance) publishes empirical research related to social science and governance issues.

The article must be original, meaning it has never been published in another journal or is being considered for publication in another journal and is free from plagiarism. The manuscript must be written in Indonesian or English correctly.

Manuscript length between 8-15 pages, A4 paper size, typed single space, Word 2003 and above, Cambria 11, top margin, bottom 3 cm and right 2.5 cm, and left 4 cm.

ARTICLE STRUCTURE

Research article structure

 

TITLE: The title is expected to be clear, effective and efficient, the title consists of a maximum of 15 words including conjunctions.

AUTHOR NAME: The author is listed without a title.

Institution: The institution is listed along with an e-mail address (only for Corresponding Author).

ABSTRACT: The abstract length is a minimum of 150 words and a maximum of 200 words, accompanied by keywords of at least 3 words and a maximum of 5 words.

INTRODUCTION: written without subtitles. The introduction in the manuscript includes the background, research objectives, theoretical framework or literature review referring to the latest literature. Reference sources are at least 10 of the latest International Journals (last 10 years). Total references are at least 15 sources.

RESEARCH METHOD: Research Method is written without subtitles. The research method in the manuscript explains the approach, procedures/methods used, research location, population and sample, data collection techniques, and data analysis techniques.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. The subtitles in the results and discussion are adjusted according to needs. The results and discussion are written systematically. Graphs/Charts, Tables are adjusted according to needs.

CONCLUSION. explained briefly in the form of an essay without points, to answer the research objectives. Suggestions and recommendations for research results and opportunities to conduct further research.

REFERENCES: All sources of quotations in the manuscript must be included in the references. The writing style of citations follows the guidelines of APA 7. APA style can be seen at http://www.apastyle.org/pubmanual.html. Writing citations and references is also recommended using the Mendeley application (https://www.mendeley.com).

The following is an example of a suggested citation.

 

The source comes from a book.

Last Name, Initials. (Year). Book Title. Place of Publication: Publisher.

Example: Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. New York: Jossey-Bass.

Source comes from Journal Article Last Name, Initial. (Year). Journal Article Title. Publisher's Journal, Volume (Number), Pages.

Example: White, E. (2009). Student perspectives of peer assessment for learning in a public speaking course. Asian EFL Journal, 33(1), 1-36.

Tierney, R., & Simon, M. (2004). What's still wrong with rubrics: focusing on the consistency of performance criteria across scale levels. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(2), 1-10.

 Suñol, J. J., Arbat, G., Pujol, J., Feliu, L., Fraguell, R. M., & Planas-Lladó, A. (2016). Peer and self-assessment applied to oral presentations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(4), 622-637.

Articles

Section default policy

Pernyataan Privasi

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.