Policy Implementability in Public Sector Innovation: Reconstructing Classical Implementation Theory

Authors

  • Nizar Hilmi Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Lili Nur Indah Sari Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpsi.v10n2.p1-12

Abstract

This article reconstructs classical determinants of public policy implementation into a policy implementability framework for contemporary public sector innovation. Drawing on Van Meter and Van Horn, Edwards III, and Sabatier and Mazmanian, this article uses an integrative conceptual review to reorganize variables that are often treated separately in the top-down tradition. The main argument is that implementation failure should not be understood only as a downstream administrative weakness, but also as an outcome of low implementability embedded in policy design. The synthesis identifies four interrelated dimensions of policy implementability: policy design clarity, administrative capacity, institutional structuring, and socio-political support. These dimensions explain how policy decisions are transformed into implementation outputs, target-group compliance, and policy performance. By linking classical implementation theory with studies on policy capacity, public sector innovation, digital transformation, local governance, climate adaptation, disaster risk reduction, and implementation gaps, the article offers a diagnostic framework for assessing implementation readiness before policies are carried out. The contribution is to shift the analytical focus from asking why policies fail after adoption to asking whether policies are designed to be implementable from the outset. The framework is relevant for analyzing innovative, digital, collaborative, and cross-sectoral policies that require interorganizational coordination, behavioral change, technological capacity, and sustained political legitimacy.

Keywords: policy implementability, policy implementation, policy design, public sector innovation

Author Biography

Lili Nur Indah Sari, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Department of Public Administration Science, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences

References

Abrams, J., Wollstein, K., & Davis, E. J. (2018). State lines, fire lines, and lines of authority: Rangeland fire management and bottom-up cooperative federalism. Land Use Policy, 75, 252-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.038

Aina, Y. A. (2017). Achieving smart sustainable cities with GeoICT support: The Saudi evolving smart cities. Cities, 71, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.007

Akhirianto, N. A., Ma'rufatin, A., Wardani, K. S., Kayadoe, F. J., & Kongko, W. (2025). Bridging policy and practice in tsunami disaster risk reduction: Evaluating local implementation challenges in eastern Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 124, 105491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105491

Alaerts, G. J. (2020). Adaptive policy implementation: Process and impact of Indonesia's national irrigation reform 1999-2018. World Development, 129, 104880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104880

Babalola, A. A., & Olawuyi, D. S. (2022). Overcoming regulatory failure in the design and implementation of gas flaring policies: The potential and promise of an energy justice approach. Sustainability, 14(11), 6800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116800

Balonier, S., & Huber, S. G. (2025). Governance of the implementation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in schools: Perceptions of key stakeholders in education. Sustainability, 17(21), 9734. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219734

Bar, S., & Beeri, I. (2025). Who gets the credit? Claiming political credit and avoiding blame in regional inter-municipal cooperation. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767251345878

Barchana-Lorand, D., & Weinberger, Y. (2024). Implementing an institution-wide pedagogical change in an Israeli college: The AWpack advising system in support of academic writing. Policy Futures in Education, 22(1), 130-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103221136166

Berman, P. (1978). The study of macro- and micro-implementation. Public Policy, 26(2), 157-184.

Brown, K., Naylor, L. A., & Quinn, T. (2017). Making space for proactive adaptation of rapidly changing coasts: A windows of opportunity approach. Sustainability, 9(8), 1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081408

Brueck, C., & Liefner, I. (2025). Local varieties of state-directed green and digital innovation processes in China: Evidence from Shanghai, Hangzhou, and Longyan. Geoforum, 161, 104247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104247

Busilacchi, G., De Angelis, M., & Luppi, M. (2025). Implementation arrangements and policy success in active social policies: Evidence from Italy's minimum income scheme. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2025.10074

Chamusca, P. (2025). Measuring and addressing territorial cohesion: A framework for regional development in Portugal. Sustainability, 17(7), 3061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073061

Chen, C., Gao, J., & Chen, J. (2022). Behavioral logics of local actors enrolled in the restructuring of rural China: A case study of Haoqiao Village in northern Jiangsu. Journal of Rural Studies, 93, 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.021

Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 21(2), 264-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477

de Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209

Edwards III, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.

Engin, Z., & Treleaven, P. (2019). Algorithmic government: Automating public services and supporting civil servants in using data science technologies. The Computer Journal, 62(3), 448-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxy082

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181

Goggin, M. L., Bowman, A. O., Lester, J. P., & O'Toole, L. J. (1990). Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Scott, Foresman.

Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2016). Achilles heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation & Governance, 10(4), 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12091

Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: Can policy support programs help? Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378

Lember, V., Brandsen, T., & Tonurist, P. (2019). The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1665-1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619807

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610447713

Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145-174. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1181674

Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and public policy. Scott, Foresman.

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.

Sabatier, P. A., & Mazmanian, D. A. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x

Torfing, J., Sorensen, E., & Roiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795-825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057

Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector: Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103

Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3-4), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Hilmi, N., & Sari, L. N. I. (2026). Policy Implementability in Public Sector Innovation: Reconstructing Classical Implementation Theory. JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations), 10(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpsi.v10n2.p1-12

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 39 , PDF Downloads: 37