Diffusion of Recapitulation Information System (SIREKAP) Innovation in Realizing the Integrity of the 2024 Elections in Meranti Islands Regency, Riau Province, Indonesia
Keywords:
Election Integrity, Diffusion of Innovation, SIREKAPAbstract
This article discusses the diffusion of Recapitulation Information System (Sirekap) innovation to improve the integrity of the 2024 Election in Kepulauan Meranti Regency, Riau Province, Indonesia. The diffusion of innovation provides an overview of the extent to which the community accepts adopting the Sirekap Application. Integrity is a very important value in elections, so many developed countries utilize technology to improve the integrity of their elections. However, using technology not only improves election integrity but can also damage election integrity. The Indonesia General Election Commission (KPU) is trying to improve election integrity by using Sirekap to count and recapitulate votes in the 2024 election. Sirekap is a means of publishing vote counting and recapitulation tools. The use of Sirekap in the 2024 election has sparked debate among stakeholders at the national level. However, this incident did not occur in Kepulauan Meranti Regency without debate in the community. The purpose of this study is to analyze the efforts of the KPU of Kepulauan Meranti Regency, Riau Province Indonesian in communicating Sirekap technology to stakeholders and the social community and to analyze the assessment of stakeholders and the community regarding the existence of Sirekap. This research uses a case study method with triangulation techniques from interview data and documentation. The study results show that the Sirekap Innovation Diffusion Process in the Meranti Islands Regency is running quite well by conveying innovations in supporting Sirekap. However, some innovations are not legally certain and prone to problems. The openness of public information and transparency of election result data are well established, thus realizing elections with integrity. Communication is carried out to all stakeholders except the community, even though the community is an important element in elections. User mastery of Sirekap technology is relatively fast. The social system that is formed is based on election organizers' sense of responsibility for the tasks that have been given. Election organizers, election supervisors, and election participants mostly responded well to the use of Sirekap in the Meranti Islands Regency. The community, as an element that is not directly involved with Sirekap, also gave a good response by actively accessing Sirekap on the 2024 Election results publication page so that Sirekap facilitates openness of information and transparency of election result data to realize elections with integrity.
References
Abbas, I. (2024). Menuai Kritik, Bawaslu Minta KPU Jelaskan ke Publik soal Kendala Aplikasi Sirekap. Viva.Co.Id. https://jatim.viva.co.id/kabar/10975-menuai-kritik-bawaslu-minta-kpu-jelaskan-ke-publik-soal-kendala-aplikasi-sirekap
Adams, S., & Asante, W. (2022). Biometric election technology, voter experience and turnout in Ghana. 21(1). http://www.africanelections.org/
Agus, R. (2018). KPU Diminta Terapkan Teknologi Informasi dalam Penghitungan Suara. https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20181217/15/870373/kpu-diminta-terapkan-teknologi-informasi-dalam-penghitungan-suara
Akbar, P., Pribadi, U., & Purnomo, E. P. (2020). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Pegawai dalam Penerapan Sidalih di Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Analitika, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31289/analitika.v12i1.3350
Alam, A. S., & Sultan, M. I. (2016). Keterbukaan Informasi Publik melalui Sistem Penghitungan (SITUNG) Online Hasil Pilkada terhadap Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Perilaku Masyarakat di Kota Palu. 5(1), 92–103.
Amaliyah, S. (2024). Dua Hari Jelang Pencoblosan, KPPS Sejumlah Daerah Keluhkan Aplikasi Sirekap. NU.Or.Id. https://nu.or.id/nasional/dua-hari-jelang-pencoblosan-kpps-sejumlah-daerah-keluhkan-aplikasi-sirekap-U5rv6
Arya Fernandes August Mellaz. (2019). Serial Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Serentak 2019 Perihal Refleksi Pemilu Serentak 2019. Jakarta: Bawaslu, December.
Cheeseman, N., Lynch, G., & Willis, J. (2018). Digital dilemmas: the unintended consequences of election technology. Democratization, 25(8), 1397–1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1470165
Demo, Y. (2024). Forum BEM Se-DIY Temukan 2.447 Anomali Data Sirekap Diduga Gelembungkan Suara Paslon Tertentu. News.Okezone.Com. https://news.okezone.com/read/2024/02/21/510/2973558/forum-bem-se-diy-temukan-2-447-anomali-data-sirekap-diduga-gelembungkan-suara-paslon-tertentu
Ekowati, E. Y. (2019). Implementasi Kebijakan Silon : Pendaftaran , Penelitian , dan Penetapan Anggota DPRD Surabaya 2019 Perspektif Integritas Pemilu Silon Policy Implementation : Registration , Research , and Determination of 2019 Surabaya Regional Parliament Members Election. 5(4), 1–11.
Feisal, R. (2024). Fraksi PKS minta KPU evaluasi penghitungan suara Sirekap. Antaranews.Com. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3970017/fraksi-pks-minta-kpu-evaluasi-penghitungan-suara-sirekap
Femiliona, F. (2021). Usaha KPU Mempertahankan Prinsip Transparansi pada Proses Pencalonan melalui Sistem Informasi Pencalonan (SILON). Jurnal PolGov, 2(2), 277–319. https://doi.org/10.22146/polgov.v2i2.1679
Garnett, H. A., James, T. S., & Macgregor, M. (2022). Electoral Integrity Global Report 2019-2021. July, 1–44. http://www.electoralintegrityproject.com
Isiaq, A. A., Ambali, A., & Olayinka, I. A. (2018). Election, Technology and Voter Turnout in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic : A Study of 2015 Kwara Gubernatorial Election Isiaq, Atanda Abdulwaheed Ambali, Abdulrauf Olayinka, Isiaka Akeem. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 7(1), 327–344. www.fountainjournals.com/index.php/fujmas/article/view/200/92
Kawima, E., & Harling, M. C. Van. (2021). Peta Jalan Sirekap Pemilu 2024 : Upaya Menerangi Lorong Gelap Untuk Menjamin Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Hasil Pemilu dan Pemilihan. Komisi Pemilihan Umum.
Lee, A., Partono, S., & Udi, K. P. (2017). Inovasi Pemilu: Mengatasi Tantangan, Memanfaatkan Peluang (p. 186).
Luxiana, K. M. (2024). PSI: Sirekap KPU Penting, Harus Dilanjutkan. News.Detik.Com2. https://news.detik.com/pemilu/d-7206965/psi-sirekap-kpu-penting-harus-dilanjutkan
Mahpudin, M. (2019). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Pemilu Di Tengah Era Post Truth: Antara Efisiensi dan Kepercayaan. Jurnal PolGov, 1(2), 157. https://doi.org/10.22146/polgov.v1i2.55886
Mochtak, M., Lesschaeve, C., & Glaurdić, J. (2021). Voting and Winning: Perceptions of electoral integrity in consolidating democracies. Democratization, 28(8), 1423–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1918111
Muliawati, A. (2024). KPU Jelaskan Alasan Penghentian Sementara Rekapitulasi Pemilu 2024. News.Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/pemilu/d-7201644/kpu-jelaskan-alasan-penghentian-sementara-rekapitulasi-pemilu-2024
Pratama, H. M., & Salabi, N. A. (2020). Panduan Penerapan Teknologi Pungut-Hitung di Pemilu: Buku Panduan untuk Indonesia. In Panduan Penerapan Teknologi Pungut-Hitung di Pemilu: Buku Panduan untuk Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2020.28
Rachmadina, R. (2024). Suara 02 Menjulang di Sirekap, Gerindra: Curang Tidak Bisa Dilakukan di Sistem Sirekap. Kompas.Com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2024/02/16/15380731/suara-02-menjulang-di-sirekap-gerindra-curang-tidak-bisa-dilakukan-di
Rahayu, D. T. (2018). SIPOL Dalam Proses Pendaftaran Peserta Partai Politik. April 2018, 181–202. https://www.bagi-in.com/jumlah-penduduk-di-indonesia/,
Ramadhanil, F., Pratama, H. M., Nurul Amalia Salabi, & Sadikin, U. H. (2019). Evaluasi Pemilu Serentak 2019 : Dari Sistem Pemilu Ke Manajemen Penyelenggaraan Pemilu. In Jurnal Renaissance (Vol. 4, Issue 01). https://perludem.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Buku-Evaluasi-Pemilu-Serentak-2019-Dari-Sistem-ke-Menejemen-Pemilu.pdf
Ricky, R. (2022). Pengembangan studi tentang pemilu dan digitalisasi secara global dan tantangannya di Indonesia: Analisis Bibliometrik. Musamus Journal of Public Administration, 4(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.35724/mjpa.v4i2.4123
Sinambela, N. M. (2024). KPU terima surat PDI Perjuangan soal audit forensik digital Sirekap. Antaranews.Com. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3974958/kpu-terima-surat-pdi-perjuangan-soal-audit-forensik-digital-sirekap
Stockemer, D. (2018). The Internet: An important tool to strengthening electoral integrity. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.009
Suwanti, N. C. (2024a). Golkar soal Audit Sirekap: Silakan, Tidak Ada Kekuatan Hukum dan Tidak Berdampak pada Penghitungan. Kompas TV. https://www.kompas.tv/nasional/487205/golkar-soal-audit-sirekap-silakan-tidak-ada-kekuatan-hukum-dan-tidak-berdampak-pada-penghitungan
Suwanti, N. C. (2024b). PKB Kecewa dengan Teknologi Sirekap: padahal Anggaran Besar dan Diagung-agungkan KPU. Kompas TV. https://www.kompas.tv/nasional/487204/pkb-kecewa-dengan-teknologi-sirekap-padahal-anggaran-besar-dan-diagung-agungkan-kpu
Tarouco, G. (2023). Varieties of Electoral Integrity Risk: Protecting Elections in Brazil - Case study. Varieties of Electoral Integrity Risk: Protecting Elections in Brazil - Case Study, September. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2023.50
Winburn, J. (2020). Review of Electoral Integrity in America: Securing Democracy. American Review of Politics, 37(1), 161–162. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-779x.2020.37.1.161-162
Zaman, M. I. (2024). Kekeliruan di Sirekap, KPU: Tak Ada Niat Manipulasi, Tak Ada Niat Ubah Suara. NU.Or.Id. https://www.nu.or.id/nasional/kekeliruan-di-sirekap-kpu-tak-ada-niat-manipulasi-tak-ada-niat-ubah-suara-P0CHt
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section

