MENAKAR POTENSI DAN TANTANGAN DALAM MENGGAGAS TRANSMIGRASI LOKAL DI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA

Authors

  • Pandhu Yuanjaya Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta dan Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Muhammad Arif Fahrudin Alfana Fakultas Geografi, Universitas Gadjah Mada dan Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan, Universitas Gadjah Mada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpsi.v1n1.p29-36

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the potentials and challenges of local transmigration in Yogyakarta Special Region. This study crucial to consider the population that is concentrated in the Yogyakarta City and Sleman Regency as areas more develop than others. This is mix method research. Data were collected by
questionnaires, observations, interviews and secondary data analysis. This study focused on Sultan Ground (SG) and Pakualaman Ground (PAG) in the three regencys, Gunung Kidul, Bantul and Kulon Progo. The findings show that the SG and PAG, potential and worthy of being local transmigration destination areas.
Land use in three districts varied such as: agriculture, farming and fisheries. Some of the challenges that must be resolved before this policy made include the completion status and land-use conflicts, acceptance of local residents and increase the skills capacity of migrants.

References

Adhiati, M dan Bobsien, A. 2001. An Update: A Report Prepared for Down to Earth. International Campaign for Ecological Justice in Indonesia [http://www.downtoearth-indonesia.org].

Hayashida. 2006. Transmigration Policy and Regional Development in Indonesia. Journal of The Social Sciences. 23-47.

Hoey, B., A. 2003. Nationalism in Indonesia: Building Imagined and Intentional Communities Trough Transmigration. Ethnology, 109-26.

Hugo, G. 2006. Forced Migration in Indonesia: Historical Perspectives. Jurnal Asia and Pacific Migration. 53-92

Kesaulija, F., et. al. 2014. Oil palm estate development and its impact on forests and local communities in West Papua. Working Paper 156, Center for International Foresty Research.

Levang, P. et. al. 1999. Not Every Cloud Has A Silver Lining: Crop Farmers in Transmigration Areas. ACIAR Indonesian research project. Working paper. 99: 16.

Miles, B. B dan Huberman, A. M. 1992. Analisa Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Press

Nitiyasa, I. G dan Sudibia, I. K. 2013. Menggalakkan Program Transmigrasi Melalui Peningkatan Pembangunan Daerah. PIRAMIDA: 50- 56

Nugroho, A. S. 2013. Evaluation of Transmigration (Transmigrasi ) In Indonesia: Changes In Socioeconomic Status, Community Health and Environmental Qualities of Two Specific Migrant Populations. Desertasi Kagoshima University.

Pona, La. 2005. Stereotip Etnis Masyarakat Papua Terhadap Transmigran. Makalah seminar Prospek Pembangunan Transmigrasi di Provinsi Papua. Unpublished paper
Sheil, et.al. 2006. Recognizing Local Peoples Priorities for Tropical Forest Biodiversity. Ambio 35; 17-24

Sierra, R. 2001. The Role Of Domestic Timber Markets in Tropical Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Ecuador: Implications For Conservation Planning and Policy. Ecological Economics. 327-340

Smith, N. 1981. Colonization Lessons from a Tropical Forest. Science. 755-761.

Sunderlin, W. D. and Resosudarmo I. A. P. 2001. Rate and Causes of Deforestation in Indonesia: Towards a Resolution of the Ambiguities. cifor.org.

Downloads

Abstract views: 276 , PDF Downloads: 441