Analyzing Collaborative Governance Dynamics in Kendalbulur Village Development, Tulungagung Regency

Authors

  • Ajie Hanif Muzaqi Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Kadiri
  • Junari Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Kadiri
  • Dyah Ayu Rahmawati Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Kadiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpsi.v8n1.p22-28

Keywords:

Collaborative Governance, Development, Village Fund

Abstract

The collaborative governance framework today can be used to solve the complexity of the government's problems. One of the problems that can be addressed by implementing collaboration is the development of more prosperous and independent villages. This study aims to analyze collaborative governance practices in village development in relation to village fund budget management. This research was conducted in Kendalbulur Village, Tulungagung Regency, with a qualitative deductive approach, so the primary data was obtained through in-depth interviews and observations. The result of this study is that the implementation of collaborative Governance in Kendalbulur Village faces various dynamics, one of which starts from the content of the village fund policy itself. The interpretation of the village development policy still results in a double argument about whether the village fund policy is to develop more partial rural areas or build more empowerment-oriented villages. This interpretation will later impact the collaboration process between networks of actors in Kendalbulur village so that the established pattern of collaboration will be more complex. The results of collaborative-based village development must consider the starting conditions and dynamics that occur to make institutional design a determinant in the development of Kendalbulur Village.

References

Andini, U. H. (2015). Pemberdayaan ekonomi masyarakat dari desa tertinggal menuju desa tidak tertinggal (Studi di Desa Muktiharjo Kecamatan Margorejo Kabupaten Pati). Brawijaya University.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Persentase Penduduk Miskin (P0) Menurut Provinsi dan Daerah 2020-2021. In Bps.Go.Id. https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/23/192/1/persentase-penduduk-miskin-p0-menurut-provinsi-dan-daerah.html

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.

Hardianti, S. (2017). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pembangunan infrastruktur desa (program alokasi dana desa di Desa Buntongi Kecamatan Ampana Kota). Katalogis, 5(1).

Irawan, N. (2017). Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Desa Era UU Desa. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Kementerian Desa Republik Indonesia. (2020). Tentang Indeks Desa Membangun. https://idm.kemendesa.go.id/view/detil/1/tentang-idm

Madjid, T. dkk. (2020). E-Book Peringkat Indeks Desa Membangun Tahun 2020. Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia.

Miles. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook. UI-Press.

Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. The Guilford Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Hanif Muzaqi, A., Junari, & Ayu Rahmawati, D. (2023). Analyzing Collaborative Governance Dynamics in Kendalbulur Village Development, Tulungagung Regency. JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations), 8(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpsi.v8n1.p22-28
Abstract views: 171 , PDF Downloads: 36