Respon Guru Terhadap Pertanyaan Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Biologi di SMA

Authors

  • Norhasanah Norhasanah SMAN 4 Basabai Kabupaten HST Kalimantan Selatan
  • Muhammad Zaini FKIP ULM Banjarmasin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/jppms.v2n1.p%25p

Abstract

Cara berkomunikasi dengan peserta didik sering diabaikan oleh guru karena fokus pada penyampaian materi sesuai pesan kurikulum. Tidak terkecuali pada pembelajaran biologi, bahkan seyogyanya lebih menekankan proses dari pada penanaman konsep. Penelitian kelas ini bertujuan menjelaskan tanggapan guru terhadap pertanyaan siswa berkaitan dengan komunikasi yang ia gunakan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif yang didekati dengan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan subyek penelitian adalah guru biologi yang mengajar kelas X MIA 1 SMA Negeri 4 Barabai tahun pelajaran 2017/2018. Observasi dilakukan untuk mendapatkan data menggunakan format respon guru terhadap pertanyaan siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ada tiga macam respon guru terhadap pertanyaan siswa yakni verbal, non verbal dan positif. Respon verbal dan positif menempati (86,7%) dan respon non verbal (60%), persentasi respon non verbal ini terlalu besar, oleh karena itu, guru seyogyanya merespon positif setiap pertanyaan siswa.

Kata kunci: repon guru, pertanyaan siswa, komunikasi

 

The communication aspect is often overlooked because the teacher only focuses on the delivery of material according to the curriculum message. It is no exception to biology learning, it should even emphasize the process rather than conceptualizing. This class study aims to explain the teacher's response to student inquiries related to the communication he uses. Descriptive research method with a quantitative approach. The research subject of biology teacher who teaches class X MIA 1 SMA Negeri 4 Barabai academic year 2017/2018. Data were collected through observation using teacher response format to students' questions. Data analysis is done by the descriptive method. The results showed that there are three kinds of teacher responses to the student's questions verbal, non-verbal and positive. Verbal and positive responses occupy (86.7%) and non-verbal responses (60%), the percentage of non-verbal responses is too great, therefore teachers should respond positively to each student's question.

Keywords:  teacher response, student question, communication

References

Astuti, W. P., Prasetyo, A. P. B., & Rahayu, E. S. (2012). Development of Authentic Assessment-Based Literacy Instruments of Science in the Material of Excretion Systems. The Science Sheet, 41 (1).

Birdwhistell, R.L. 1985. Kinesics and Context: Essays on Body Motion Communication. USA: University of Pennsylvania Publication.

Elfanany, B. 2013. Smart Body Language Books for Teachers and Lecturers. Yogyakarta: Aksara

Hermansyah, M.P., 2017. Macam Komunikasi Non verbal Dikalangan Sopir Angkutan Umum Penumpang (Studi Deskriptif Simbol dan Tanda Komunikasi saat Berkendara di kalangan Sopir Travel Antar Kota Antar Provinsi Rute Malang-Jogja) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Muhammadiyah Malang).

Hamdan, Y. & Ratnasari, A., 2016. Presentation Skills In Marketing Business Product. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, 19(2).

Hopkins, David. 1993. A.Teacher Guide to Classrom Researe 2nd. Buckingham : Open Univ. Press.

Hostetter, A.B. & Alibali, M.W. 2008. Visible Embodiment: Gestures as Simulated Action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 15(3), pp. 495-514

Hurley, D. S. 1992. Issues in teaching pragmatics, prosody, and non verbal communication. Applied Linguistics, 13(3), pp. 259-280.

Liliweri, Alo. 2011. Komunikasi Serba Ada Serba Makna. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Novianti, I. 2013. Student Perception of Teacher Communication Advisor In Implementation Of Information Service In SMP 26 Padang. Journal of Scientific Counseling) in http: // ejournal. unp. air conditioning. id / index. php / accessible counselor, 28.

Nurmala, R., Maulana, S., and Prasetio, A. 2016. Verbal and non verbal communication in the process of teaching and learning activities. Journal of Education and Learning.

Pontoh, W. P. 2013. The Role of Master's Interpersonal Communication in Improving Child's Knowledge. Journal of Acta Diurna, 2 (1).

Sitompul, N. C. 2012. Nonverbal Communication Behavior Teachers In Classroom Learning: Its Meaning For High School Students. Journal of Education and Learning (JPP), 19 (1), pp. 38-49.

Valenzeno, L., Alibali, M. W., & Klatzky, R. (2003). Teachers gestures facilitate students learning: A lesson in symmetry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(2), pp. 187-204.

Wainwright, G.R. 2006. Membaca Bahasa Tubuh. Edisi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Baca.

Wicaksono, G. and Naqiyah, N., 2013. Penerapan teknik bermain peran dalam bimbingan kelompok untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi interpersonal siswa kelas X multimedia SMK IKIP Surabaya. Journal Mahasiswa Bimbingan Konseling, 1(1), pp.61-78.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-06

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 795 , PDF Downloads: 521