Pengembangan Lembar Kegiatan Mahasiswa (LKM) Berbasis Assessment as Learning pada Matakuliah Kimia Anorganik III
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/jppms.v3n2.p65-74Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan LKM berbasis Assessment as Learning yang memenuhi kelayakan ditinjau dari validitas, keefektifan dan kepraktisannya. Desain penelitian menggunakan Four-D Model yang meliputi tahap define, design, develop dan disseminate, namun dalam penelitian ini hanya sampai tahap develop. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengetahui validitas, keefektifan dan kepraktisan LKM secara berturut-turut adalah Lembar Validitas, Tes Hasil belajar dan Lembar Respon Mahasiswa. LKM dinyatakan valid jika memperoleh persentase validitas > 61%. Hasil belajar mahasiswa dinyatakan tuntas jika memperoleh nilai > 55. LKM dinyatakan efektif jika ketuntasan klasikal > 61%. LKM dinyatakan praktis jika persentase respon positif mahasiswa terhadap LKM > 61%. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa LKM berbasis Assessment as Learning telah memenuhi kelayakan digunakan dalam pembelajaran ditinjau dari validitas, keefektifan dan kepraktisannya.
Kata kunci: Pengembangan LKM, Kelayakan, Assessment as Learning
This research aim to develop Worksheet base on Assessment as Learning that it has feasibility based on its validity, effectiveness and practically. Research design use Four-D Model covering phase of define, design, develop and of disseminate, but in this research only until develop phase. Instrument used to know validity, effectiveness and practical successively are Sheet of Validity, Test of learning result and Sheet of Student Response. Worksheet expressed valid if obtaining percentage of validity > 61%. Learning result of student expressed mastery if obtaining value > 55. Worksheet expressed effective if is mastery classically > 61%. Worksheet expressed practice if percentage of positive student response toward LKM > 61%. Result of research indicate that worksheet base on Assessment as Learning has feasibility to used in learning based on its validity, effectiveness and practical.
Keywords: Developing Worksheet, feasibility, Assessment as Learning
References
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.2006. Instrumen Penilaian Tahap II Buku Teks Pelajaran Kimia SMA/MA. Jakarta:BSNP.
Davies, A., Pantzopoulos, K., dan Gray, K. 2011. Emphasising Assessment as Learning by Assessesing Wiki Writing Assignment Collaboratively and Publicly Online. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.
DE&T. 2013. Strategies for Assessment As Learning. Diakses tanggal 24 April 2017 dari: https://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/teachlearn/ student/activity4_4a.pdf.
Earl, Kerry dan Giles, David. 2011. An-other Look at Assessment: Assessment in Learning. New Zealand Journal of TeachersWork, Volume 8
Issue 1, page 11-20, 2011.
Earl, Lorna. 2003. Assessmen as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press.
Earl, L. & Katz, S. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind. Assessment for learning, assessment as learning,
assessment of learning. Western and Northern Canadian Protocol for Collaboration in Education (WNCP).http://www.wncp.ca/media/40539/r
ethink.pdf
Glasson, Toni. 2008. Improving student achievement through Assessment for Learning. Curriculum & Leadership Journal, Volume 6 Issue 31, October 2008.
Ibrahim, Muslimin. 2001. Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Jerold E. Kemp dan Thiagarajan. Surabaya: Faculty of Mathematics and Science State University of Surabaya.
Lam, R. 2015. Assessment as learning: examining a cycle of teaching, learning, and assessment of writing in the portfolio based classroom. Studies in Higher Education. Routledge.
Lee, Icy dan Mak, Pauline. 2009. Assessment as Learning in the Language Classroom. Assessment and Learning, Issue 3.
Menristekdikti RI, 2015a. SalinanPermenristekdikti RI No. 44 tahun 2015
tentang Standar Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Kemristekdikti RI.
Menristekdikti RI, 2015b. LampiranPermenristekdikti RI No. 44 tahun 2015
tentang Standar Nasional Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Kemristekdikti RI.
Ministry of Education. 2010. Growing Succes: Assessmen, Evaluation and Reporting in Ontario School. Diakses tanggal 25 Januari 2017 dari http://www.edu.gov.on.ca.
Radnor, H. (1996). Evaluation of key stage 3 assessment in 1995 and 1996. Exeter: University of Exeter.
Riduwan. 2012. Skala Pengukuran Variabel Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rowe, Jessica. 2012. Assessmen as LearningETEC 510, Diakses Oktober 2016 dariwww.etec.ubc.ca/510wiki/Assessment_as _Learning#Assessment_ for_Learning.
Stiggins, Rick dan Chappuis, Jan. 2006. What a difference a word makes: Assessmen FOR Learning rather than assessmen of Learning helps students succeed. JSD, Vol. 27 No. 1.
Team. 2014. The Impact of Formative Assessment and Learning Intention on Student Achievement. Diakses tanggal 29 April 2017 dari www.hanoverresearch.com
Tim Penyusun Buku Pedoman Unesa. 2015. Buku Pedoman Universitas Negeri Surabaya untuk Angkatan 2015. Surabaya: Upress.
Volante, Louis. 2009. Assessment of, for, and as Learning within Schools: Implication for Transforming Classroom Practice. Action in Teacher Education, Volume 31 Number 4 page 66-75.
Vos. H. 2001. Metacognition in Higher Education. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Twente Press.
Wiliam, Dylan. 2013. Assessment: The Bridge between Teaching and Learning. Voice from the Middle. Vol. 21, No. 2.
Western and Northern Canadian Protocol (WNCP). (2006). Rethinking Classroom Assessment: Assessment for Learning, Assessment as Learning, Assessment of Learning. Diakses tanggal 24 April 2017 dari:
http://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/assess/wncp/rethinking_assess_mb.pdf
Wong, H.M. 2014. I can assess myself: Singaporean primary students and teachers perception of students self assessment ability. Education, 3(13), 1-16.
Abstract views: 310
,
PDF Downloads: 531
