The Influence of the Prodamas Program on Enhancing the Local Economy of Kediri City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26740/ijss.v9n1.p16-27Abstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of community perception, participation, and mindset on the Community Empowerment Program (Prodamas) in enhancing the local economy of Kediri City. Prodamas is a form of budget decentralization that enables residents to be directly involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating development at the neighborhood level. Using a quantitative approach and multiple linear regression analysis with 100 respondents, the study reveals that community participation and mindset have a significant and positive effect on local economic growth, whereas perception does not have a direct impact. This research underscores the importance of active citizen involvement and a positive mentality as key determinants of the success of development programs. The recommendations emphasize strengthening community institutions and adopting more effective visual communication strategies.
References
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Blakely, E. J., & Leigh, N. G. (2013). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cohen, J. M., & Uphoff, N. T. (1977). Rural development participation: Concepts and measures for project design, implementation and evaluation. Rural Development Committee, Center for International Studies, Cornell University.
Cooper, D. R., & Emory, C. W. (2015). Business research methods (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283.
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed., M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Continuum. (Original work published 1970).
Hidayati, R. N. (2021). Efektivitas program Prodamas dalam pemberdayaan ekonomi warga Kota Kediri. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Komunitas, 5(2), 85–98.
Iramaimuna, A. (2016). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam Program Fasilitasi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Prodamas) Kelurahan Bujel Kecamatan Mojoroto Kota Kediri. Publika, 4(4).
Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems (J. Bednarz Jr. & D. Baecker, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
Mankiw, N. G. (2007). Principles of economics (4th ed.). Thomson/South-Western.
Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Localizing development: Does participation work? World Bank.
Mardikanto, T., & Soebiato, P. (2013). Pemberdayaan masyarakat dalam perspektif kebijakan publik. Alfabeta.
Midgley, J. (1995). Social development: The developmental perspective in social welfare. SAGE Publications.
Narayan, D. (Ed.). (2002). Empowerment and poverty reduction: A sourcebook. World Bank.
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Rahmiyati, N., Andayani, S., & Indartuti, E. (2020). Participation and evaluation of Prodamas Program in Kediri, East Java. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 11(1), 188–191.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
Tamrin, M. H., Fatimah, S. S. N., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). Community participation in the successful Community Empowerment Program (Prodamas) in Ngronggo Village, Kediri City. JKMP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/jkmp.v10i1.1681
Tauran, T. (2025). A place-based approach to urban policy: Reflections from the Prodamas Program in Kediri, Indonesia. The Journal of Society and Media, 9(1), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v9n1.p320-341
Wandersman, A., Florin, P., Friedmann, R., & Meier, R. (1987). Who participates, who does not, and why? Sociological Forum, 2(3), 534–555.
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249.
Yulistya, G. I., & Rahaju, T. (2023). Implementasi Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Prodamas) Plus pada bidang ekonomi di Kelurahan Bangsal Kota Kediri (Studi pada Koperasi Sehat Sejahtera ERWE 2 Bangsal). Publika, 11(2), 1697–1710.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bakar Abdullah Abu, Theresia Pradini, Fathorrahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Indonesian Journal of Social Studies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 12
,
PDF Downloads: 2
