Application of Agency Theory in Administrative Accountability and Public Service Delivery in Local Government Councils in Delta State

Authors

  • EGBON, Thomastina Nkechi
  • SOKOH, Gbosien Chris
  • OKEREKA, Onofere Princewill

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/ijss.v6n2.p127-132

Abstract

The Agency Theory was extensively covered in this study. The investigation used secondary data from books and articles that had already been published. Despite objections, changes in the government, and reservations from some sections of the public, the agency theory has proven to be a useful paradigm in enhancing public accountability and improving the delivery of public services. Local government councils in Delta State may benefit from applying agency theory, which can enhance the provision of public services, employee performance, administrative accountability in the public sector, and public confidence in elected officials. The majority of public administration research reflects agent theory-related presumptions that support public administrators' capacity for learning and effectiveness. As a result of the aforementioned, it is crucial for Delta State's local government council leaders to strictly adhere to accountability in the management of local government affairs in order to encourage quality service delivery. The study comes to the conclusion that in Nigerian public administration, administrative accountability is a crucial but underdeveloped concept. The phrase is freely used by academics and professionals to refer to accountability for one's actions or behavior. Administrators and organizations are responsible in the sense that they must account for their actions. Beyond this fundamental idea of answerability, the term has not undergone much development in Delta State's local government councils.

References

Agaptus, N. (2011). Bureaucratic and systemic impediments to public accountability in Nigeria. International Journal of Politics and Good Governance, 2 (4). 1-20.

Berley, A.Y., & Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation. New York Macmillan.

Bouckova, M. (2015). Accounting and agency theory. Procedia Economics and Finance, 25, 5-13.

Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20 - 47.

Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Agency theory: A review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.

Iyowuna, M., & Davies, E.O. (2021). Pension fund administration and welfare of retirees in Rivers State civil service commission, 200-2018. Public Policy and International Affair Academic Journal, 3(3), 1-37.

Mitnick, B. (1986). The theory of agency and organisational analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh.

Olsen, J.P. (2013). The institutional basis of democratic accountability. West European Politics, 36, 447-473.

Schillemans, R. (2013). Public administration. Massachusetts: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Van-Essen, M. (2011). An institution-based view of ownership. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Publications.

Vargas-Hernandez, J.G., & Cruz, M.E.T. (2018). Corporate governance and agency theory: Megacable case. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 2(1), 1-11.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31

How to Cite

Thomastina Nkechi, E. ., Gbosien Chris, S. . ., & Onofere Princewill, O. . (2023). Application of Agency Theory in Administrative Accountability and Public Service Delivery in Local Government Councils in Delta State. The Indonesian Journal of Social Studies, 6(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.26740/ijss.v6n2.p127-132

Issue

Section

Articles
Abstract views: 47 , PDF Downloads: 54