Historical Paradigm and Polemics In The Right To Freedom Of Speech In Public Space In The 21st Century

Wafiyuddin Musyaffak; Moses Glorino Rumambo Pandin

doi:10.26740/ijss.v4n2.p22-30

Authors

Wafiyuddin Musyaffak Universitas Airlangga http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0734-7715
Moses Glorino Rumambo Pandin Universitas Airlangga http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8053-3215

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26740/ijss.v4n2.p22-30

Abstract

The right to freedom of speech is a natural right owned by every human being born on earth. However, with the development of the times, freedom of speech has experienced many steep paths in practice. This study aims to provide insight into how the historical and polemic paradigms are faced in freedom of speech in the 21st-century public sphere, especially in its development and practice. The method used in this research is to qualitative research methods with the approaches literature review of the literature resources during the last three years, which was in 2019-2021. The result of this study is to provide insight into the historical and polemic paradigms that occur in the right to free speech in the 21st century. The conclusion is that freedom of speech is very important but we must remember that our freedom is limited by the freedom of others.The right to freedom of speech is a natural right owned by every human being born on earth. However, with the development of the times, freedom or freedom of speech has experienced many steep paths in practice. This study aims to provide insight into how the historical and polemic paradigms are faced in freedom of speech in the 21st-century public sphere, especially in its development and practice. The method used in this research is to qualitative research methods with the approaches literature review of the literature resources during the last three years, which was in 2019-2021. The result of this study is to provide insight into the historical and polemic paradigms that occur in the right to free speech in the 21st century. The conclusion is that freedom of speech is very important but we must remember that our freedom is limited by the freedom of others.

References

Cahyono, E. A., Sutomo, & Harsono, A. (2019). Literatur Review: Panduan Penulisan dan Penyusunan. Jurnal Keperawatan, 12.

Fajariyah, S. (2021). Kajian Yuridis Pengaturan Kebebasan Berpendapat Dalam UU ITE (Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik).

Indonesia, C. (2021). UU ITE Plus Buzzer, Ancaman Kebebasan Berpendapat Era Jokowi. Cnnindonesia.Com. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20210217152444-20-607439/uu-ite-plus-buzzer-ancaman-kebebasan-berpendapat-era-jokowi

Irfan, K. (2020). Survei: Hanya 14.6 Persen Responden Mendapat Informasi soal Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi dari Pemerintah. Kompas.Com. ttps://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/12/15/21241071/survei-hanya-146-persen-responden-mendapat-informasi-soal-hak-kebebasan

Marwandianto, & Ardani, N. H. (2020). Hak Atas Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi dalam Koridor Penerapan Pasal 310 dan 311 KUHP. Jurnal HAM, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.1-25

Matias, S. D. P. (2019). Kebebasan Berpendapat Menurut Teori Kebebasan Dan Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Di Indonesia. 8(5), 55.

Nasution, L. A. A., & Harahap, F. Y. (2019). Hak Asasi Manusia. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/qgkpu

Pahad. (2020). Hate Speech (Ujaran Kebencian/Hate Speech Dan Batasan Kebebasan Berekspresi).

Rahmawati, N., Muslichatun, & Marizal, M. (2021). Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Pemerintah Melalui Media Sosial Dalam Perspektif UU ITE. Universitas Tidar, 3(1).

Rizaldi, M. (2019). Kebebasan Berpendapat di Internet dan Hukum Pidana. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-4647796/kebebasan-berpendapat-di-internet-dan-hukum-pidana

Rukin. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Pertama). Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia.

Sari, R. F., Komunikasi, I., Mada, U. G., Sosio, J., No, Y., Depok, K., & Sleman, K. (2019). Menyoal Kebablasan Berpendapat : Malfungsi Media Sosial Sebagai Panggung Produsage Konten Negatif.

Umroh, F. (2020). Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) Pada Jejaring Media Sosial. 15.

Yahya, A. N. (2020). Survei IPI: 69,6 Persen Responden Setuju Publik Kian Takut Sampaikan Pendapat. Nasional.Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/10/25/16305891/survei-ipi-696-persen-responden-setuju-publik-kian-takut-sampaikan-pendapat