Historical Paradigm and Polemics In The Right To Freedom Of Speech In Public Space In The 21st Century

Authors

Keywords:

sosial, hak asasi manusia, paradigma

Abstract

The right to freedom of speech is a natural right owned by every human being born on earth. However, with the development of the times, freedom of speech has experienced many steep paths in practice. This study aims to provide insight into how the historical and polemic paradigms are faced in freedom of speech in the 21st-century public sphere, especially in its development and practice. The method used in this research is to qualitative research methods with the approaches literature review of the literature resources during the last three years, which was in 2019-2021. The result of this study is to provide insight into the historical and polemic paradigms that occur in the right to free speech in the 21st century. The conclusion is that freedom of speech is very important but we must remember that our freedom is limited by the freedom of others.The right to freedom of speech is a natural right owned by every human being born on earth. However, with the development of the times, freedom or freedom of speech has experienced many steep paths in practice. This study aims to provide insight into how the historical and polemic paradigms are faced in freedom of speech in the 21st-century public sphere, especially in its development and practice. The method used in this research is to qualitative research methods with the approaches literature review of the literature resources during the last three years, which was in 2019-2021. The result of this study is to provide insight into the historical and polemic paradigms that occur in the right to free speech in the 21st century. The conclusion is that freedom of speech is very important but we must remember that our freedom is limited by the freedom of others.

References

<p>Antariksa, K., Wp, Y. S. P., &amp; Ernawati, D. (2019). Klasifikasi Ujaran Kebencian pada Cuitan dalam Bahasa Indonesia. 10, 164171.<br />Cahyono, E. A., Sutomo, &amp; Harsono, A. (2019). Literatur Review: Panduan Penulisan dan Penyusunan. Jurnal Keperawatan, 12.<br />Fajariyah, S. (2021). Kajian Yuridis Pengaturan Kebebasan Berpendapat Dalam UU ITE (Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik).<br />Indonesia, C. (2021). UU ITE Plus Buzzer, Ancaman Kebebasan Berpendapat Era Jokowi. Cnnindonesia.Com. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20210217152444-20-607439/uu-ite-plus-buzzer-ancaman-kebebasan-berpendapat-era-jokowi<br />Irfan, K. (2020). Survei: Hanya 14.6 Persen Responden Mendapat Informasi soal Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi dari Pemerintah. Kompas.Com. ttps://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/12/15/21241071/survei-hanya-146-persen-responden-mendapat-informasi-soal-hak-kebebasan<br />Kardiyasa, I. M., Dewi, A. A. S. L., &amp; Karma, N. M. S. (2020). Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech). Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(1), 7882. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.1.1627.78-82<br />Kusumasari, D., &amp; Arifianto, S. (2019). Makna Teks Ujaran Kebencian Pada Media Sosial. 9, 115. http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/jk.v12i1.4045<br />Marwandianto, &amp; Ardani, N. H. (2020). Hak Atas Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi dalam Koridor Penerapan Pasal 310 dan 311 KUHP. Jurnal HAM, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.1-25<br />Matias, S. D. P. (2019). Kebebasan Berpendapat Menurut Teori Kebebasan Dan Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Di Indonesia. 8(5), 55.<br />Nasution, L. (2020). Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi dalam Ruang Publik di Era Digital. Adalah, 4(3), 3748. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v4i3.16200<br />Nasution, L. A. A., &amp; Harahap, F. Y. (2019). Hak Asasi Manusia. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/qgkpu<br />Pahad. (2020). Hate Speech (Ujaran Kebencian/Hate Speech Dan Batasan Kebebasan Berekspresi).<br />Perdana, A. P., &amp; Yusuf, W. (2020). UU ITE Tentang Efek Media Sosial Terhadap Generasi Milenial. 8(3), 297308. https://doi.org/10.35450/jip.v8i03.214<br />Rahmawati, N., Muslichatun, &amp; Marizal, M. (2021). Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Pemerintah Melalui Media Sosial Dalam Perspektif UU ITE. Universitas Tidar, 3(1).<br />Rizaldi, M. (2019). Kebebasan Berpendapat di Internet dan Hukum Pidana. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-4647796/kebebasan-berpendapat-di-internet-dan-hukum-pidana<br />Rukin. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Pertama). Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia.<br />Samudra, A. H. (2019). Pencemaran Nama Baik Dan Penghinaan Melalui Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Di Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UU ITE. 50(1), 91105. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2484<br />Sari, R. F., Komunikasi, I., Mada, U. G., Sosio, J., No, Y., Depok, K., &amp; Sleman, K. (2019). Menyoal Kebablasan Berpendapat¯: Malfungsi Media Sosial Sebagai Panggung Produsage Konten Negatif.<br />Umroh, F. (2020). Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) Pada Jejaring Media Sosial. 15.<br />Warong, K. M., Waha, C. J., &amp; Tangkere, C. (2020). Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Kebebasan Berpendapat Oleh Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Dimedia Sosial. VIII(5), 4453.<br />Yahya, A. N. (2020). Survei IPI: 69,6 Persen Responden Setuju Publik Kian Takut Sampaikan Pendapat. Nasional.Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/10/25/16305891/survei-ipi-696-persen-responden-setuju-publik-kian-takut-sampaikan-pendapat</p>

Downloads

Published

2022-04-19

How to Cite

Musyaffak, W., & Pandin, M. G. R. (2022). Historical Paradigm and Polemics In The Right To Freedom Of Speech In Public Space In The 21st Century. The Indonesian Journal of Social Studies, 4(2). Retrieved from https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpips/article/view/13705

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): December

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract views: 211 , PDF Downloads: 258